True Blue
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 30,092
- 8,362
YOUR expectations. You mean. Of course all top two picks are different. Have they ALL jumped into the league immediately? Have they ALL been teenagers? Has a single one of them in the entire history of the NHL had to come in and not play for 10 months, with the only practice being in a backyard rink? Actually, name one professional athlete in ANY sport that was a top choice and then entered his professional league not having played for 10 months? Bet you can't. In which case painting them all with a single broad stroke seems to be incredibly short sighted.I hesitate to get into this with you again, but expectations for top 2 draft picks are simply different than those of late first rounders or thirds like Buch. They by definition should have less developing to do. If Kakko develops and produces on a similar timeline as Buchnevich that is a failure, bottom line.
Does not change the fact that they ARE the youngest team in the league for two years running. With that comes the need to for experience and the need to learn.This roster looks nothing like historical post 1OA rosters. That’s a new reality enabled by the lottery. The Rangers did not, and still don’t, have a roster that’s similar to most teams that pick 1OA.
For reference, why don't you look at what happened to Tampa for an entire decade after they got the 1OA. A DECADE.