- Jul 7, 2017
- 3,227
- 12,158
So, speculating our lineup with Kase?
NN-Aho-TT
Svech-Staal-Kase
Dzingel-Haula-Necas
Foegele-Wallmark-Martinook
Extra: McGinn??
Only change I would make is swap Kase and TT.
So, speculating our lineup with Kase?
NN-Aho-TT
Svech-Staal-Kase
Dzingel-Haula-Necas
Foegele-Wallmark-Martinook
Extra: McGinn??
So, speculating our lineup with Kase?
NN-Aho-TT
Svech-Staal-Kase
Dzingel-Haula-Necas
Foegele-Wallmark-Martinook
Extra: McGinn??
I know my view may look a bit idealized, if not downright fantasizing, but I see a legit goodwill value in helping an on-his-way-out player to get the best contract he can have, when you have already pretty much chosen to not try fit his ask in your own cap structure.
I don't see Necas going to the AHL. I also don't see one of the remaining guys being a scratch. Definitely looks like somebody gets moved for futures to a team needing a proven NHL forward (sorry, somebody is going to Edmonton).Can't see any way McGinn is an extra. Or Foegele or Martinook for that matter either. If the Canes get Kase, then either a forward has to be traded or Necas goes to the AHL.
Can't see any way McGinn is an extra. Or Foegele or Martinook for that matter either. If the Canes get Kase, then either a forward has to be traded or Necas goes to the AHL.
I don't personally think that anyone will be benched if the Canes get Kase. They will just make the fourth line Foegele-Wallmark-McGinn-Martinook and rotate three of them every game depending on hot hands and the health of the players.
I mean, Justin definitely has the leverage here to negotiate with teams that are on his ok-trade list.
My guess is there's backroom talk between the Canes and Faulk's agent that let's him/them know where possible, realistic trade options exist. It does nobody any good to have those discussions if there's not a viable trade in place. The Faulk value proposition becomes somewhat different based on this season's performance.
Those feelings seem to run counter to each other. There's a limited pool of teams that have the need, the cap space and the competitive motivation to trade for him. In a somewhat cursory glance around the league, Anaheim, Arizona and Edmonton (requires the Canes retaining or taking back some money) are the only teams that stand out.
This shouldn't end with the team taking whatever they can get. He has value as an own-rental.
There's several teams that can use him with an extension, such as Dallas (requires Hanzal to LTIR), Winnipeg (Extended Faulk + prospects for Ehlers), and Detroit (Mantha or Athanasiou). If Colorado wants to let Byram develop and stick him in juniors for a year, they can use Faulk as a rental for perhaps a late 1st. Nashville could also use some RHD help considering the Subban trade, though IMO they may be more interested in TVR than Faulk. There's more choices than you may think, though Kase is far and away my favorite of the bunch.
I doubt we can do either of those as the cap coming back this year would be larger than what we moved out with Faulk. We'd be further over the cap and now have to trade instead of just sending AHLers down.
Ah, yes, I misread Mantha's salary, so that is true. However, I think part of the motivation for the Jets to possibly move Ehlers was to reduce cap for their two RFAs and get defense. If we send the same cap back to them, they may not be as willing to move him.If you add McGinn's salary to Faulk in an Ehlers trade, Canes would clear more than enough space. Mantha also only makes $3.3M this year.
There's several teams that can use him with an extension, such as Dallas (requires Hanzal to LTIR), Winnipeg (Extended Faulk + prospects for Ehlers), and Detroit (Mantha or Athanasiou). If Colorado wants to let Byram develop and stick him in juniors for a year, they can use Faulk as a rental for perhaps a late 1st. Nashville could also use some RHD help considering the Subban trade, though IMO they may be more interested in TVR than Faulk. There's more choices than you may think, though Kase is far and away my favorite of the bunch.
Dallas is a possible option, I'll grant you that. Winnipeg isn't trading Ehlers for Faulk+, extension or not. Otherwise, the Jets don't have the cap space to acquire him once Laine and Connor sign, unless the Canes take back a Kulikov or Perrault. That seems pointless. I have no idea why Detroit would trade Mantha or Athanasiou for Faulk given its competitive situation. Yzerman knows what he's doing; the time isn't right for that. Byram is irrelevant; Colorado will have Johnson and Makar on the right side in its Top 4. Trading a 1st for a rental doesn't strike me as something Sakic would do. Nashville won't be a player unless Carolina is giving him away.
Anaheim seems to covet Faulk the most, though, at least in terms of that regard.
I get the feeling like its increasingly likely that Faulk gets moved sometime soon
I also get the feeling that the odds of him going to Anaheim are decreasing by the second
Why would you say that? If that were true, this deal would have been done two days ago.
Anaheim coveting Faulk the most != Anaheim coveting Faulk enough to make it worth Faulk waiving.
I don't know if they've necessarily offered the best deal, but they're the ones coming with a player we've targeted for a while, so there is mutual interest to get something done there. The problem is, I just don't think Faulk is going to waive to go there.Faulk is talking with Anaheim because they made the offer the Canes like the best. If that means they covet him the most, then so be it. But if they really liked him, they'd sign him.
Faulk is talking with Anaheim because they made the offer the Canes like the best. If that means they covet him the most, then so be it. But if they really liked him, they'd sign him.
Your point seems to be that the Anaheim offer does not necessarily represent the team who covets Faulk the most simply because they gave the best offer. If a different team coveted Faulk more, isn't it more likely that their offer would show that desire, and therefore be a stronger offer?Faulk is talking with Anaheim because they made the offer the Canes like the best. If that means they covet him the most, then so be it. But if they really liked him, they'd sign him.
Your point seems to be that the Anaheim offer does not necessarily represent the team who covets Faulk the most simply because they gave the best offer. If a different team coveted Faulk more, isn't it more likely that their offer would show that desire, and therefore be a stronger offer?
It's unclear to me why you are pushing back against this.