Who would you get in free agency with that cap space ? Say this year or nextI rather have cap space than the current Petterson iteration.
i really would not. if canucks wanted marner they can go after him this summer. they have zero reason to chase him now.Wait till you see what the alternative would be. You'd beg to take Marner in return.
I can't see Teams giving up premium assets for players with question marks, and soI trully believe there is 0% chance that Miller stays in Van. He might not get traded now if the offers arent great but almost certainly in the off-season.
I think the " Personal Leave of Absence" had something to do with a locker room incident where he crossed the line.
Miller has been checking in and out games. He will float, then he will dominate the Oilers and Mc/Drai, then he will float again.
I think both him and management have agreed its time for a change.
Ppl that repeat this type of drivel know that real life GMS dont have the memory of a hamster right?Pettersson has 44 points in 62 games since securing his 11.6M x 8YR contract
What on earth makes you think he's worth that much?
In a deal for Pettersson?
If so, I’d offer up a package of Frost, York and Tippett.
If Foerster is insisted on for either York or Tippett, I’d tweak the deal but it’s not a hard no.
His salary still lowers his value. He is due 10m on July 1st.Ppl that repeat this type of drivel know that real life GMS dont have the memory of a hamster right?
He's worth whatever he's worth because the sample size is not sixty games....
On this note, I’m guessing Miller offers are crap.
I really think a good fair deal is around Couts, Risto and Miller IF Van wants to go for it.
The ironic most valuable piece on this deal is (shockingly) Ristolainen, who at present is the Flyers #3 (and playing like it.) Every dman partnered with him has great advanced stats (himself included) and Flyers may actually be reluctant to move him.
Couts isn’t the 75 point player he was, but is still a selke caliber defensive forward and on pace for 40-50 points. On a team with an actual 1C he would thrive IMO.
Miller is obviously the better offensive player but has attitude concerns that make him risky. Both contracts are similar. But not a stretch that he has more value than Couts so a 1:1 deal isn’t fair. All players are similar in age.
Risto provides Vancouver their second pair anchor, big RHD and is signed for a few years.
Vancouver can send some salary back.
Actually says more about their actual two way ability than anything else.Matthews and Marner being back to back Selke Finalists says more about the voting body than their ability...
Man, I am a part of Leaf nation but the hate one of the best players of the last 30 years on the Leafs gets is absolutely ridiculous. He is the type of player that can and will win you games single handedly. Literally can take over games. Marner is NOT the problem! Depth has always been the problem. You have a 3rd line that can chip in here and there, then your top line doesn’t get the lions share of the worst match ups. It’s pretty simple. Strengthen the bottom six and the top six become that much better.Marner plays in the biggest media market around, of course he's going to get undeserved votes.
He's incredibly overpaid when he regresses in the playoffs every year. His 90 point regular season are meaningless when he turns into a $6m player in the playoffs.
A top 5 winger in the league that wouldn't get picked top 20 in the playoffs, and that's before cap hits are accounted for
And, honestly, his playoff numbers aren't bad.Not really. Hes a very reliable regular season player who is a question mark in the playoffs. Hes also not on a long term contract.
Who knows what Petterson is at this point.
Oh cry me a river with this bottom 6 nonsense. The overpaid 4 lose all arguments about not having a bottom 6 for support when they unprecedently got $40m between themMan, I am a part of Leaf nation but the hate one of the best players of the last 30 years on the Leafs gets is absolutely ridiculous. He is the type of player that can and will win you games single handedly. Literally can take over games. Marner is NOT the problem! Depth has always been the problem. You have a 3rd line that can chip in here and there, then your top line doesn’t get the lions share of the worst match ups. It’s pretty simple. Strengthen the bottom six and the top six become that much better.
he sure sure showed his mental toughness with babcock hahahThis is kinda laughable because Pettersson is even more of a Marner sterotype than Marner. Marner is by far the better player and somehow mentally tougher too
lol now you’re talking about a 19 yo rookie that was abused by a coach with quite a checkered past. Well played smhhe sure sure showed his mental toughness with babcock hahah
abused? haha oh jeezlol now you’re talking about a 19 yo rookie that was abused by a coach with quite a checkered past. Well played smh
Except this year they have the space to improve the bottom six and a few assets that could get them the top players available. They also have a goaltending duo that can be trusted not to necessarily steal games, which they can do on occasion, but to at least not lose them games.Oh cry me a river with this bottom 6 nonsense. The overpaid 4 lose all arguments about not having a bottom 6 for support when they unprecedently got $40m between them
How many picks/prospects is Philly adding to this deal? or are they retaining 50% and paying another team to retain another 50% for 75% retention on both?On this note, I’m guessing Miller offers are crap.
I really think a good fair deal is around Couts, Risto and Miller IF Van wants to go for it.
The ironic most valuable piece on this deal is (shockingly) Ristolainen, who at present is the Flyers #3 (and playing like it.) Every dman partnered with him has great advanced stats (himself included) and Flyers may actually be reluctant to move him.
Couts isn’t the 75 point player he was, but is still a selke caliber defensive forward and on pace for 40-50 points. On a team with an actual 1C he would thrive IMO.
Miller is obviously the better offensive player but has attitude concerns that make him risky. Both contracts are similar. But not a stretch that he has more value than Couts so a 1:1 deal isn’t fair. All players are similar in age.
Risto provides Vancouver their second pair anchor, big RHD and is signed for a few years.
Vancouver can send some salary back.
How exactly was he abused? Provide links, please.lol now you’re talking about a 19 yo rookie that was abused by a coach with quite a checkered past. Well played smh
Give me a break, no one is saying he is worthless. This is a thread about value of one vs the other, he just isn’t worth a Marner in any way shape or form. Period.Just here to see how Petey is now worthless but Marner is somehow now borderline untouchable
I love how bi-polar this place is
Google it, pretty simple.How exactly was he abused? Provide links, please.
And we are talking about Mike Babcock! It isn’t just what he did as coach of the Leafs. He did it in Detroit and there are a million stories out there about players hating him for his abuse. He was hired as coach of The Jackets and fired within days for more stupid crap he pulled.How exactly was he abused? Provide links, please.