Juraj Slafkovsky - Year Two

Where would you prefer Slaf spend his 23-24 season?


  • Total voters
    596
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,332
26,364
Montréal
I love slaf , and he's looked like our best forward in the past two games .

The issue is that's an indictment on all these garbage players on the roster getting outplayed by a guy who couldn't even get a shot off 2 weeks go.

The rest of the forwards should be embarrassed by their play
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee and jrom

Whitesnake

If you rebuild, they will come.
Jan 5, 2003
90,670
39,536
Reinbacher's pick will hurt more than Slaf.....that's a gimme. Slaf will be useful to this team and surely amongst the best of his class.
 
Last edited:

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,190
16,918
Montreal
Reinbacher's pick will hurt more than Slaf.....that's a gimme. Slaf will be useful to this team.
Or maybe we can just wait a few years before making these type of pronouncements. Just one month ago a few folks didn't think Slaf would be anything.

There is so much time left for development. I still remember McDonagh's play during the WJC one year where everyone was super concerned because he struggled.
 

Whitesnake

If you rebuild, they will come.
Jan 5, 2003
90,670
39,536
Or maybe we can just wait a few years before making these type of pronouncements. Just one month ago a few folks didn't think Slaf would be anything.

There is so much time left for development. I still remember McDonagh's play during the WJC one year where everyone was super concerned because he struggled.
I never thought he'd be nothing. Even if I wanted to have him in the AHL. Clear that this kid has what it takes to be a very good player. What we will have to wait is to see who else around him will to. But it doesn't take a big degree to notice Slaf's game and how it can evolves.

See...being concerned about a prospect is normal. I have no idea how ''being concerned'' means that we think he will amount to nothing. Those exaggerations do not help the discussion. We have a hard enough time as fanbase to understand each other, might as well not invent stuff based on what we think the poster meant....and just go with what was said.

The funny part about the let's wait crowd it's that when we want to talk about the past. we are told that's in the past....Anybody wants to revise the 2018 draft now?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

Deebs

Without you, everything falls apart
Feb 5, 2014
17,429
14,373
I never thought he'd be nothing. Even if I wanted to have him in the AHL. Clear that this kid has what it takes to be a very good player. What we will have to wait is to see who else around him will to. But it doesn't take a big degree to notice Slaf's game and how it can evolves.

See...being concerned about a prospect is normal. I have no idea how ''being concerned'' means that we think he will amount to nothing. Those exaggerations do not help the discussion. We have a hard enough time as fanbase to understand each other, might as well not invent stuff based on what we think the poster meant....and just go with what was said.
Being concerned is no big deal, but when you say Slaf will be useful while insinuating Reinbacher will not...well, not the best way to put it
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
30,203
21,649
Being concerned is no big deal, but when you say Slaf will be useful while insinuating Reinbacher will not...well, that's not a very intelligent comment.

I think the vast majority of his forum has absolutely no idea how good Reinbacher is going to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrom and Deebs

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,346
49,656
People are hard tonight on Caufield and Suzuki and others for not finishing Slaf passing plays. But to beat a goalie in the NHL you need an element of surprise. I knew, so did many fans and especially Cam Talbot knew exactly what was unfolding.

Of course, Slaf was setting up the guy in front as always. Zero element of surprise. Talbot already knew in the dressing room before the game. Talbot gets square to the shooter cutting his angle. Despite being a routine save, he looks like a hero. Expect Slaf to make many more goalies look great in the future and make his linemates look like bozos.
This is silly. Slaf set up his teammates and you’d have us believe that it didn’t work because it was too predictable? Get real man.

Yes, he needs to shoot more but in a night like tonight his linemates should be converting.

His finishing abilities are a whole other issue…

But in the meantime, to convert a pass into an assist, Slaf needs goalies to take him seriously as a shooting threat. The book is already out among NHL goalies that he’s not.
Again, this is gobbledygook. Everyone in the ice knew Oates would pass but it didn’t matter. There are tons of pass first players.

On a two on one? Sure. But the play is happening quickly and Slaf’s pass out to CC wast telegraphed, it was awesome.

Totally agree he has to shoot more but to say his play was ‘too predictable’ last night is nonsense.
 
Last edited:

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,451
30,294
Ottawa
Or maybe we can just wait a few years before making these type of pronouncements. Just one month ago a few folks didn't think Slaf would be anything.

There is so much time left for development. I still remember McDonagh's play during the WJC one year where everyone was super concerned because he struggled.
Prisoner’s of the moment
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Andy

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,451
30,294
Ottawa
I never thought he'd be nothing. Even if I wanted to have him in the AHL. Clear that this kid has what it takes to be a very good player. What we will have to wait is to see who else around him will to. But it doesn't take a big degree to notice Slaf's game and how it can evolves.
Yet you got folks trying really really hard not to notice his game and how it has evolved.
See...being concerned about a prospect is normal. I have no idea how ''being concerned'' means that we think he will amount to nothing. Those exaggerations do not help the discussion. We have a hard enough time as fanbase to understand each other, might as well not invent stuff based on what we think the poster meant....and just go with what was said.
Except most of the concerns have everything to do with allowing current concerns (which granted, are mostly fair) with a player, determine what they're going to be for the long term.

That's why people wanted/want to see Slafkovsky in the AHL, they don’t want to see him “learn on the job”, they want to see a finished product.
The funny part about the let's wait crowd it's that when we want to talk about the past. we are told that's in the past....Anybody wants to revise the 2018 draft now?
It's weird to have a “lets wait crowd” for a fanbase that's been clamouring for a rebuild.

I mean..:what y’all think this was gonna be about? Lol
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,212
5,937
This is silly. Slaf set up his teammates and you’d have us believe that it didn’t work because it was too predictable? Get real man.

Yes, he needs to shoot more but in a night like tonight his linemates should be converting.


Again, this is gobbledygook. Everyone in the ice knew Oates would pass but it didn’t matter. There are tons of pass first players.

On a two on one? Sure. But the play is happening quickly and Slaf’s pass out to CC wast telegraphed, it was awesome.

Totally agree he has to shoot more but to say his play was ‘too predictable’ last night is nonsense.
Did you not think he was passing on each of those plays? He’d have more assists if he wasn’t a “pass always” player. Give the goalies something to think about.

As for Oates, I will go and review his shooting stats but I assume he was a “pass first” player like Thornton, not a “pass always”. Slaf is rewriting the NHL history books as the first “pass always” player.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,346
49,656
When a 19 year old starts to become your best forward it is time to start giving him props.
Have to noticed he is always looking to set up Caufield but Cole barely acknowledges Slaf during the PP?
Honestly no. I’ve seen CC trying to set him up.
 

OldCraig71

Juice Arse
Feb 2, 2009
35,846
56,870
No one cares
When a 19 year old starts to become your best forward it is time to start giving him props.
Have to noticed he is always looking to set up Caufield but Cole barely acknowledges Slaf during the PP?
I notice this. What I am seeing is Cole passes to Nick and Nick passes to Cole and then sprinkle in Matheson who doesn't see anyone and shoots randomly often derailing a promising pp. He has the vision of Josh Anderson. I see Slaf tapping his stick on the ice but rarely getting the pass.
 

Pazucha

Registered User
Apr 3, 2023
580
1,068
Lets not blame CC for not passing on the PP they are playing on the opposite site so its not an easy pass.

Also CC is not known for making amazing no look passes through traffic.

If anything it was Matheson who had the opportunity to pass it to Slaf few times.
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,212
5,937
I notice this. What I am seeing is Cole passes to Nick and Nick passes to Cole and then sprinkle in Matheson who doesn't see anyone and shoots randomly often derailing a promising pp. He has the vision of Josh Anderson. I see Slaf tapping his stick on the ice but rarely getting the pass.
If i was Cole I wouldn’t pass to Slaf. He’s just doing another pass. It’s pointless.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,346
49,656
Did you not think he was passing on each of those plays? He’d have more assists if he wasn’t a “pass always” player. Give the goalies something to think about.

As for Oates, I will go and review his shooting stats but I assume he was a “pass first” player like Thornton, not a “pass always”. Slaf is rewriting the NHL history books as the first “pass always” player.
I think you’re way over the top on this. He’s got 60 games in the NHL. The idea that the league has him all figured out is dumb.

Yes, he should shoot more. But those plays last night were great. They weren’t telegraphed or predictable. The cross ice to CC was particularly awesome. Unfortunately I don’t even think CC expected it.
 
Last edited:

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,346
49,656
Lets not blame CC for not passing on the PP they are playing on the opposite site so its not an easy pass.

Also CC is not known for making amazing no look passes through traffic.

If anything it was Matheson who had the opportunity to pass it to Slaf few times.
CC is facing crazy coverage now. He passes off way more than he used to because there’s no open ice for him.
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,212
5,937
I think you’re way over the top on this. He’s got 60 games in the NHL. The disease that the league has him all figured out is dumb.

Yes, he should shoot more. But those plays last night were great. They weren’t telegraphed or predictable. The cross ice to CC was particularly awesome. Unfortunately I don’t even think CC expected it.
On the PP, Slaf is basically a glorified arena board you bounce pucks on.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Beaker

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,451
30,294
Ottawa
No its not a miracle.

Its expected for a 19 years old with his talent to grow and explode like that.

Happens every single year with many prospects.
Exactly.

It's just that growth, typically happens at lower levels, where fans aren't watching every single shift/game like they are now with Slafkovsky. So they don't see the ups and downs. They just see the points on the scoresheet and assume everything is going great with a player's development.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad