jbeck5
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2009
- 16,973
- 3,818
I'm sure someone will emerge from this draft as an elite offensive forward as almost every draft produces one, but this draft was a nightmare on projecting which player that was going to be. Slafkovsky's in most drafts was a guy who goes in the 3 to 5 range, and possibly outside that in a really strong draft class like 2015. Not every draft has a guy at the top who you look at, and think it's likely they become a high-end scorer like MacKinnon, McDavid, Matthews, Hughes, and Bedard. 2022 and 2021 for whatever reasons lacked players who you could say, unless something goes wrong, this player is likely to be a top 10 goal scorer or point-getter in the league. Slafkovsky is still only 19. Even if he only turns into more of a secondary scorer with a strong forechecking/puck battle type game, he's likely to still be a valuable piece for whatever team he's on. It's not like Cooley or Wright are putting up great numbers where the Habs should be regretting their choice from the other two viable forward options available at 1OA this year.He might not ever be the offensive juggernaut that other first overalls were, but he’s still going to be a good player. The bust talk about an 18-year-old was nonsense.
Size was the only one of the three that I can agree is rare for him. Hes fast, but not outrageously so. NHL edge has him as a 81 percentile top speed bursts player, 69 percentile for speed bursts over 20 mph and 69 percentile for skating distance. As for skill, again several players enter the league each year that have more skill that Slaf.
No need to cherry pick, he started playing with them in early November, here are the numbers since then:Slafkovsky wasn't playing with Caufield or Suzuki in his first dozen games.
Since November 14th, which is around the time he got Caufield on his line, he's been the top scorer among 2022 picks by a decent amount.
View attachment 815935
Slaf also just keeps on getting better. He now has 7 goals and 15 pts in his last 21 games.
Kakko was 21 last season, Slaf isn't even 20 yet.kakko put up 40 last season. at least wait until slaf puts two good seasons together.
I think he was saying if we think Miller is a PPG player, he got there at 24ish, he thinks slaf will get there at 20/21ish and maintain it over the next decade or soBy "hit that peak sooner and possibly produce at that peak longer than Miller has"
Are we talking about Miller's peak or slaf?
Because Miller has 249 points over 211 games in the last 3 years which averages to 97 points over 82 games for those years.
Are you saying slaf will hit his own peak earlier and keep it for long...
Or are you saying slaf will be producing at roughly 100 point pace per season soon and will keep it up for longer?
That's super high hopes considering much better players have struggle to do so.
My point is that his speed and skill aren't that noteworthy (yet). The only thing truly in the unique category with him is his size (25ish players in the league are his size), so roughly 1 player per team is his size.I don't know why you are looking at each of these separately.
What makes him a unicorn is that he has all of these 3 aspects together.
Players of Slaf's skating ability are numerous, but if you consider only those with a similar talent level, the list gets shorter, and if you also only consider players of his size the list gets a lot shorter.
Both matter, but defenseman rely much more on secondary scoring, which is not a new development.So here you are bringing primary point into the argument. Yet earlier, as seen below, you used PPG as an argument. Which one is it Whiskey? How many of Nemec's 12 assists or Minty's 17 assists are primary?
#BUSTED
Or Mackinnon is Jesus and raised his boy LazerDrouin from the dead.Drouin is Phoenix. Rose from the ashes this season.
No he hasn't, Slaf hasn't played exclusively with them over that time frame, he also had to play with Monahan and Black Hole anderson.No need to cherry pick, he started playing with them in early November, here are the numbers since then:
View attachment 815956
Again, Slaf is playing great, but he's got a lot more support on his line (and consistency) than Cooley has. He's also getting a 2-3 more mins per night, and is playing the easier position.
Miller reached his peak in 2021/22 as a 28 year old. He is still in his peak. He has yet to score 100 points, but could do it this year. His peak included a PPG season last year. He will likely fall from his peak after next season. Meaning a 4 year total peak.Yes you think he'll be 100 point player for many years?
The number of players with his height/weight and skill combo if development goes right is likely <5 in the league at any given time. That's why he went 1st overall.My point is that his speed and skill aren't that noteworthy (yet). The only thing truly in the unique category with him is his size (25ish players in the league are his size), so roughly 1 player per team is his size.
If a player is around 1 SD away from average (69th percentile) that isn't enough to be a unicorn.
And as far as skill goes, I would argue there are also hundreds of NHLers with comparable or greater skill.
Don't forget DvorakNo he hasn't, Slaf hasn't played exclusively with them over that time frame, he also had to play with Monahan and Black Hole anderson.
Of the 668 5v5 mins Slaf has played since early November, he's only played 88 minutes without Suzuki or Caufield on the ice.No he hasn't, Slaf hasn't played exclusively with them over that time frame, he also had to play with Monahan and Black Hole anderson.
I'd say honestly it gets tossed around pretty generally for just very big guys who also have skills. Have heard it used for Tom Wilson a bunch, Habs front office was throwing it around for Florian Xhekaj at the draft lolI guess we differ on those terms. I see what you are saying of course.
I'd view that type of player as a generational full package player. (Eric lindros comes to mind specifically to me)
In theory slafkovsky could have been there but since he has the physical toolbox, but he is more a project full package player than generational because it was pretty clear coming into the final draft that he was not going to dominate like a Crosby or mcdavid or Malkin / ovechkin impact right away.
He went first cause hes big, we all know this. But other than his size I don't see anything in his game to consider him a unicorn. And even just looking at his size, 25-30 players in the league are just as big as him.The number of players with his height/weight and skill combo if development goes right is likely <5 in the league at any given time. That's why he went 1st overall.
Too early but Cooley if I’m starting from scratch.
Could see MTL wanting to stick with Slaf in 5 years though if he’s a possession monster 50-60 pt guy as that’ll be a pretty unique player.
So secondary scoring only counts for defensemen, because they rely on that more. For forwards, we should only count primary scoring.Both matter, but defenseman rely much more on secondary scoring, which is not a new development.
Cooley currently has the edge and probably will throughout the career but Slaf could be a very rare player. I don't think he ends up the best player in the draft but I don't think the gap will be big enough between him and anyone else to begrudge the pickSaid this a year ago about Cooley v. Slaf
I filtered for players that are 225 lbs+ in the NHL. Came back with 55 results. Slaf is 12th in points among those players.
NHL stats
IMO that is just too many comparable players for him to be in the unicorn category.
Is Mantha a unicorn? PLD? Byfield?
I filtered for players that are 225 lbs+ in the NHL. Came back with 55 results. Slaf is 12th in points among those players.
NHL stats
IMO that is just too many comparable players for him to be in the unicorn category.
Is Mantha a unicorn? PLD? Byfield?
Mantha had 0 points in the NHL at the same age. 0 the year after too.