Are you familiar with the concept of context? Because this isn't happening in a vacuum.
His job this year in the NHL was to get used to the NHL, that what he was tasked to according to his coach and management. He wasn't there to carry a line or the team, just getting NHL experience was the stated goal.
On an AHL squad his role would have been different, playing big minutes with the expectation of being one the best player on the squad and firsthand contribution in the team success, the pressure from within the org is higher here than in the situation above.
The context is that it was pretty clear Slaf couldn’t do his (learning) job this year. That’s what a lot of people saw and that’s what his advanced stats confirm ( he was over his head).
That’s also why Hughes was asked if he thought about sending him down. Not just a few on HFB saw this.
The context is also that we didn’t see much progress from Slafkovsky during his stay. He doesn’t do something much better then he did at the beginning of the year. His progression is slow.
Some might say that big guys take longer and they would be right. But that doesn’t mean that trying to get the best out of him isn’t important.
Normally, players that get a cup of coffee of the NHL are being tested to see how far off they are from being able to hold their own. If they are close, the testing can last longer. If they are far, the testing doesn’t last very long. Then they get sent down to work on what they need to work on.
MSL hanged on to him for a little too long, and the context of the team being injured like never before caught up to Slaf.
What we don’t know is if Slaf’s dim light is outside of the ice. Was that one of the elements that made management want to keep him. He was supposed to have great character, so this shouldn’t be a problem but we don’t know. So context is we don’t know everything.
Talking about context when just about every stats and observation we have is pointing in the same direction, while trying to make it sound like the « special » thing not everyone sees correctly, is pretty weak argument and pretty out of context.