July 1st recap: Now and the Future

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
This is not something I expected to be addressed July 1st but I still have no faith in this team against the big dogs of the league who combine skill and physicality - Ducks, Blues, Kings, Stars, Bruins.

I mean good news is only Bruins in the East fit that mold. They can outskate slow physical teams like Toronto and Philly, and have enough North-South to beat other similarly constructed teams like Montreal. But the top 9 is far too "perimeter" for my liking.
This is in line with my thinking. The forwards are still too vanilla. Homegenous.

Pat Riley says that loosing is a large part of winning. We have all heard that teams need to loose before they can win. Granted, the Rangers may be taking the latter a little too seriously. The key here is, Did Jackass learn from defeat? Did he see where the Rangers short comings are and can he build on that? I have my doubts, but hoping that I am wrong.
 
Does no one remember the summer of Dubi and Cally's arb year RFA contracts? Give it some time, people.

I know rfa offer sheets from other clubs are not the norm, but they do happen on occasion and it seems like Zuccarello and Kreider would be ripe for the taking. Any offer to either one of them would make it impossible for us to keep all three of our rfa's.

We are in a tenuous position with our salary cap, and someone can take advantage of that. All it takes is one team.
 
The third pair playing second pairing minutes and non NHL players playing third pair is the worst part by a lot. Boyle on the first pair isn't much better.

Thank you.
I consider small price to pay given how tough to get top C upgrade.

I am interested in value of deal to Col, so pls comment as to that.

As to your fair criticism, I respond:

non NHL players playing third pair is the worst part by a lot.
Hags is proven. Lindy, Fast, not so much, but these kids were already tested with Swedish Elite League or whatever you call it. They played as boys with men. They can handle the NHL given the chance, and these three look like they have chemistry written all over them as a line. They are speedy, wiry strong, look like should be a functional group.
so I respectfully disagree.

Boyle on the first pair isn't much better.
I rushed it there thinking of the PP.
He's going to go elsewhere for lower mins, I agree. Too hold to do McD mins.
I think they will do more after this, and needed to make the moves to get RyJo.
either way, I agree with the criticism as valid, but WAAAY not enough to offset straightening out bigger problems of straightening out cap, etc, issues and getting RyJo --- we are not getting Stamkos now, so gotta grab the opportunity on a RyJo, even if temp adjustments.

third pair playing second pairing minutes
Ok, yeah, I hear you, but consider this overblown.
Have faith Moore will learn or be upgraded.
Klein IMO can handle it.
Allen can handle it.
As I said more moves to come, you can't expect total resolution of ALL problems with one magic waive of the wand.

I would hope that unless/until something better turns up, we can get behind this.
Opportunities for a RyJo are far and few between.
Offer sheeting not good karma, invites retaliation + we need straighten out cap by dealing Nash, Girardi first.

I suggest we overwhelm BJs with great offer not is nice consolation to being forced to move their star to avoid $$ issues and aggravation.

Thanks again.
 
Thank you.
I consider small price to pay given how tough to get top C upgrade.

I am interested in value of deal to Col, so pls comment as to that.

As to your fair criticism, I respond:


Hags is proven. Lindy, Fast, not so much, but these kids were already tested with Swedish Elite League or whatever you call it. They played as boys with men. They can handle the NHL given the chance, and these three look like they have chemistry written all over them as a line. They are speedy, wiry strong, look like should be a functional group.
so I respectfully disagree.


I rushed it there thinking of the PP.
He's going to go elsewhere for lower mins, I agree. Too hold to do McD mins.
I think they will do more after this, and needed to make the moves to get RyJo.
either way, I agree with the criticism as valid, but WAAAY not enough to offset straightening out bigger problems of straightening out cap, etc, issues and getting RyJo --- we are not getting Stamkos now, so gotta grab the opportunity on a RyJo, even if temp adjustments.


Ok, yeah, I hear you, but consider this overblown.
Have faith Moore will learn or be upgraded.
Klein IMO can handle it.
Allen can handle it.
As I said more moves to come, you can't expect total resolution of ALL problems with one magic waive of the wand.

I would hope that unless/until something better turns up, we can get behind this.
Opportunities for a RyJo are far and few between.
Offer sheeting not good karma, invites retaliation + we need straighten out cap by dealing Nash, Girardi first.

I suggest we overwhelm BJs with great offer not is nice consolation to being forced to move their star to avoid $$ issues and aggravation.

Thanks again.

The D pairs are what gets me. The forward lines I could live with to an extent.

I just think that D is abysmal. I wouldn't feel comfortable rolling them out behind Crosby and Malkin, let alone behind that forward corps, which is good, but not elite.

I mean, no Stralman, no Staal, no Girardi? That's just not an NHL defense at that point. I think Moore can and will improve a bit, but I'm not counting on that huge of a boost from him. Klein can handle second pair, but is ideal on the third. Allen hasn't shown me he can handle regular NHL minutes over a season, especially on a pairing with another rookie.

Also, just in terms of practicality, Nash has an NTC and I'm not sure he'd waive it for Detriot. I'm also not sure they'd give that sweet of a return for him right now. Colorado just lost a center, isn't going to deal another one for a defender. Staal to Det makes more sense since they desperately just signed Quincey after losing out on a few other FAs they wanted, but I'm 100% against the Rangers moving Staal after losing Stralman. As you say all the time, you need horses, but that's not just on offense.
 
RE: offer sheets:

A team would have to offer MZA or Kreider over $5m AAV for the Rangers to actually walk away from the deal (perhaps in MZA's case, 5.5m?)

Anything over 5.05m AAV requires a team to give up their 1st, 2nd and 3rd draft picks.

While I like both players, I don't think any team is jumping to do that deal, and if they have that space in the first place, they're likely a bottom 10 team next season.
 
He's fairly night and day when it comes to the playoffs and vs reg season. But I guess if you want to say he was invisible in the post-season last yr and for Columbus then yeah, I guess he's the same.
He is a good regular season player. Especially in mid -year when playing non-playoff teams. When it comes to the playoffs where the opposition fights you for every square inch of the ice, he becomes persona non gratta. He wilts when the opposition engages him physically.
 
id stil lmatch for both players, and then move Klein and put a kid in his spot. You cant let either of them go for only a 1st 2nd and a 3rd.

would you trade either of them for that package? i wouldnt.
 
id stil lmatch for both players, and then move Klein and put a kid in his spot. You cant let either of them go for only a 1st 2nd and a 3rd.

would you trade either of them for that package? i wouldnt.

Agreed. I wouldn't move either of them for that honestly. Klein would probably and unfortunately be the casualty cap wise, but I'd do it if I had to.
 
RE: offer sheets:

A team would have to offer MZA or Kreider over $5m AAV for the Rangers to actually walk away from the deal (perhaps in MZA's case, 5.5m?)

Anything over 5.05m AAV requires a team to give up their 1st, 2nd and 3rd draft picks.

But there could be a point that if we match an offer sheet for Kreider or Zucc, it could make it difficult - or impossible - to sign all three rfa's without making us do something else that would hurt us.
 
I don't think there will be any offer sheets. Read somewhere that number of offer sheets since 2006 is very low.

But you never know, Kreider and Zucc are two precious gems. I'm sure a lot of teams would like to have their signatures.
 
id stil lmatch for both players, and then move Klein and put a kid in his spot. You cant let either of them go for only a 1st 2nd and a 3rd.

would you trade either of them for that package? i wouldnt.

That depends. If the offer sheet was coming from Detroit, I wouldn't.

If it was coming from Edmonton or something...
 
I don't think there will be any offer sheets. Read somewhere that number of offer sheets since 2006 is very low.

But you never know, Kreider and Zucc are two precious gems. I'm sure a lot of teams would like to have their signatures.

I'm just afraid Sather has put us in a perfect position to be poached, and either sign a player to much more than we would have, hurting our ability to sign other players, or losing a valuable young player.

I know offer sheets don't happen often, but we are ripe for the picking. Everyone telling us how much leverage Sather has over these guys - I hope you continue to be right.
 
Sather does have a lot of respect out there. Any GM trying to **** with Sather and his players is tough.
 
I'm less worried about an offer sheet than I am about the Brassard/Zucc RFAs getting fed up, going to arbitration, taking the one year awards and going UFA next year with no reason to come back to the Rangers.

Kreider, maybe I could see some desperate team offering but not really sure what team that would be, have to be someone not in the old boys club, one of the things Sather does have going for him, they'd have to have the cap space, real cash, have to have the picks(their own) willing to give them up in a good draft, and Kreider would want to sign there.
 
Lol how do you know this is true? He doesn't even get much respect in here!

How long has Slats been in the game? He knows how to pull a few strings ;)

I remember former Columbus GM Scott Howson once said...offer sheets are always out of the question, I don't want to become unpopular around the league.
 
Some way or other, I think the team is going to look a lot different by season's start than it does today.
 
The D pairs are what gets me. The forward lines I could live with to an extent.

I just think that D is abysmal. I wouldn't feel comfortable rolling them out behind Crosby and Malkin, let alone behind that forward corps, which is good, but not elite.

I mean, no Stralman, no Staal, no Girardi? That's just not an NHL defense at that point. I think Moore can and will improve a bit, but I'm not counting on that huge of a boost from him. Klein can handle second pair, but is ideal on the third. Allen hasn't shown me he can handle regular NHL minutes over a season, especially on a pairing with another rookie.

Also, just in terms of practicality, Nash has an NTC and I'm not sure he'd waive it for Detriot. I'm also not sure they'd give that sweet of a return for him right now. Colorado just lost a center, isn't going to deal another one for a defender. Staal to Det makes more sense since they desperately just signed Quincey after losing out on a few other FAs they wanted, but I'm 100% against the Rangers moving Staal after losing Stralman. As you say all the time, you need horses, but that's not just on offense.

We are in some level of agreement.
The Fs, while a work in progress, takes a serious step forward with RyJo and has improved cap for moves, guys like Jurco not far away.

The D I agree has been gutted, but there is no other way, and I see it is easier to get good enough D short term while Skjei, Graves, and the like are a year/yr+ away. There is zero chance of getting a guy like RyJo short of this, and we need to lock up Kreider.

as to
I just think that D is abysmal. I wouldn't feel comfortable rolling them out behind Crosby and Malkin, let alone behind that forward corps, which is good, but not elite.

I mean, no Stralman, no Staal, no Girardi? That's just not an NHL defense at that point. I think Moore can and will improve a bit, but I'm not counting on that huge of a boost from him. Klein can handle second pair, but is ideal on the third. Allen hasn't shown me he can handle regular NHL minutes over a season, especially on a pairing with another rookie.

I wouldn't say abysmal. Certainly a shell of itself. I think we have enough time to make a couple of additional moves btwn now and the season. We can't build it up overnight, I agree, but what we gain in a rarer asset on offense is worth more than defense.

For example, I'm not saying without doing more research this is the move, but you have a guy like Calle Andersson. Assume he's too far away. But you can bundle him and another guy or asset and get a dependable D or 2.

Staal hurts, more than Girardi. But Danny boy is sucking too much oxygen out of the room, and he can be a team player and let us flip him to where he first loved hockey -- Toronto. Or he can stay, and even if he plays well, there will be continued, "we need to move Nash and Girardi, we can't afford them". He and Nash can wait and force NY to sit for now, or they can move to a good team right away that is a fit for them. Staal, says RangerBoy, we should trade now. Ideally I would have preferred to do this before, and with cap, extend Stralman. Now, after moving Nash, we could enhance Staal value with an extension. But if Staal = ROR and ROR + Stepan + is what will get RyJo, that's what ya gotta do.

I agree Moore can and will improve, more than a bit, but less than I've hoped for above. But he's another guy who, showing improvement, can be flipped with assets for a better D coming back if nec.
Klein can handle second pair I agree and as we don't have the luxury of third pair for him atm, that is our stop gap. On Allen, he's looked good enough with the few times he's been showcased.
I would be willing to gamble he can handle regular NHL minutes over a season.

Again, first impression is gambling is reckless, irresponsible; but the truly irresponsible move is to not take the 4 steps back, and 3 forward with RyJo, and be temporarily worse off --- we could get guys over the course of the season.

If we have bigger, stronger faster --- Miller replacing Richards, RyJo, an improved Kreider, --- plus whoever else we can get here by playoffs, we have some equalizer vs, the bigger guys.

Finishing your comments:
Also, just in terms of practicality, Nash has an NTC and I'm not sure he'd waive it for Detriot. I'm also not sure they'd give that sweet of a return for him right now.
It is not certain, but Wings have a group of outstanding Fs that would fit the bill for at least a year or 2. All the value of Nash threads acknowledge GM Holland lusts for Nash, always has. like I said, NY is now a different team, thinner than before due to the cap. Does he want to hear constantly how he and Girardi are sucking all the life out of the room? Or does he want to get out of town on some golden parachute?
I agree it is not 100%, but it is more than plausible: deal works for Wings, for Rangers, and the player Nash.
As to how sweet a return, I saw pre draft Jurco + 1st.
I'll push that to Jurco, Larkin + 1st, but I'll give our lesser 2016 1st as well.
If what I saw was genuine indication, what I'm suggesting there is plausible.

Colorado just lost a center, isn't going to deal another one for a defender.
Ya got me here to extent I originally envisioned this pre-Statsny moving on. Also, if we had done this deal, with ROR for Staal, that would have created a bit of room, possibly enough for them to juggle and keep Stats.
That said, their D is still turdsville, unless I overlooked something during the past few days. And ROR is a prima donna. If they got enough value, they may well cut the cord. I believe they are strong with MacKinnon + Duschene (sp) and if no ROR then who, but I think given their D was a real weakness for them, they do it.

Thanks for the feedback.
Pls feel free to extend with subsequent deals that get us back enough D that had to be sacrificed here for RyJo.

Last questions on the subject.
If you are columbus, you want to extend, we get that.
Say the kid does not want a bridge deal, and wants to get paid NOW.

You don't want offer sheets.

Was my offer of ROR, Stepan + Kadri enough?
 
I'm just afraid Sather has put us in a perfect position to be poached, and either sign a player to much more than we would have, hurting our ability to sign other players, or losing a valuable young player.

I know offer sheets don't happen often, but we are ripe for the picking. Everyone telling us how much leverage Sather has over these guys - I hope you continue to be right.

We were in pretty much the same exact position last year. People forget this. McDonagh and Stepan were RFAs. They didn't get offers. Don't think Zucc or Kreider will either.
 
We were in pretty much the same exact position last year. People forget this. McDonagh and Stepan were RFAs. They didn't get offers. Don't think Zucc or Kreider will either.

People freak out every year and it's always worked out. I'm not worried
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad