Oh wow I didn't know this? Can you or anyone enlighten and refresh my memory pls?
KK was resistant to advice and coaching, reportedly had his father in his ear. He was given too much too early and became entitled much like Galchenyuk did......who also had a meddling father who was a former coach. There was alot of cryptic messaging concerning his attitude from management around the last time KK was sent to Laval and in his final season when another move to Laval was rumoured to be looming. Most of it was phrased as "KK is going to have to want to change" inferring a stubborn resolve that was reportedly emboldened by his father.
Who knows exactly what the extent of the issues were but where there is smoke there is fire. How much of that was due to his attitude, management or outside influences or a combination of each is a mystery but there does seem to be a lesson to be learned about handing mentally immature kids jobs that they are not equipped to deal with.
The same will apply to Slafkovsky, if he is an eager student and is able to cope with the ups and downs of a young player in the NHL then he probably remains with the team. If he shows any signs of an attitude then send him to Laval and make him earn his spot. Both KK and Galchenyuk felt like instant stars when they joined the team due to the rabid fan base heaping adoration on them, they felt like a young Commodus with the mob behind them and didn't need to listen to the Senate (management). I am confident in MSL and HuGo's ability to manage expectations and communicate with their young players in a much healthier manner than Therrien/Julien/Bergevin did. This should help to minimize the risk of alienating young players who are going through the peaks and valleys of a typical developmental journey.