1909
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2016
- 21,259
- 11,785
I would like to see Roy and Andersson at NHL level sometimes this season.
But you inadvertently make a point against your own agument. By citing Roy as an example of what Farrell, Heineman, and Mailloux need to develop (an NHL level teammate in your opinion), you shine the light on what is wrong with the idea that good playerss need to play on the 5th-6th-7th lines to develop properly for an NHL role.I think this is the best argument for keeping him down there. Playing with players that make you better is the best development there is.
I would bring up Andersson if we have another forward that goes down. Let's see what he can do before having another waiver decision to make next year.I would like to see Roy and Andersson at NHL level sometimes this season.
Roy went back to junior and played on the pk instead of aiming for another scoring title. He played solid D everywhere last year. Being a minus is probably more due to playing lots of minutes on a team that is not winning many games.
I haven’t seen the rocket play this year, has anyone seen Roy getting constantly owned defensively or anything? He has to know he’s not going to get called up for playing D, but Houle doesn’t usually let rookies get away with playing single zone hockey.
Any takes or analysis on his play this year?
Roy is born almost four months too early to play in the WJC.I hope Roy is left in the AHL. Go win the scoring title, play in WJC, dominate and then join us next year.
I’m all for erring on the side of caution but honestly, there’s no way if he keeps this up (not over 2ppg but a consistent seeming dominance) he doesn’t get a call up. And I’d say the smart money would have him not losing that spot once he gets it.You have to bust down the doors as a rookie, it's just how it works. The Habs roster is as weak as it gets and Roy, being a rookie, couldn't secure his place out of training camp. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that -- he is earning another look with his performances in the AHL. As @NotProkofievian says, this is how it ought to work.
In the summer I said, based on a gut feeling, that Roy will be a positive factor for the Habs in the coming year. I have zero insight or prediction capacity but I felt like his performances in the Q weren't just the result of abusing bad Q defensive players. At the WJs he showed he could keep up with better ranked prospects. There's something there for sure. I think we're all eager to see him achieve better things.
I thought he’d do a ppg but yeah not this lol.That last WJC really solidified my opinion regarding Roy. Besides all the points he scored, he was playing complete hockey that whole tournament. He was playing on the PK, on the PP, he was back checking, he was honestly everything you could want out of a top prospect and the hockey IQ was just so apparent. I mean, i'd be lying if I said I knew he's have this much success this early in the AHL, but I can't say i'm surprised either. Players like him, they just get the game. and make it seem easy.
I honestly think he can be better. He has better tools imo.Joshua Roy show his top 6 NHL potential so far in AHL. A Tyler Toffoli type of career from him, will be very good for Habs. So far, he show that he can become that type of player. Toffoli, smart, good shot, good hands, good hockey IQ and great two-way game aswell. I'm a big fan of Toffoli, so having that type of player in Habs system, that's a huge win.
Let him take a run at the calder next season, no rush in bringing him up!Not sure why people say there’s no opening in the Top 6 when half of them aren’t top 6 players. Bring him up to play first line and let him take a run at the Calder
I mean, he did end up in the net lolYeah like not playing armia. I saw gally scored but missed the game. Did a puck get caught in his jersey and someone shovelled him into the net?
A Toffoli-like career would not be so bad. 2 X 30 plus goals, 4 X 20 plus goals and 228 in 737 NHL games. Roy's linemates will have something to do with his final point totals.I honestly think he can be better. He has better tools imo.
Oh I like Toffoli plenty. If he ends up similar to him I’d be a bit disappointed but ultimately that’s a fantastic 5th rounder.A Toffoli-like career would not be so bad. 2 X 30 plus goals, 4 X 20 plus goals and 228 in 737 NHL games. Roy's linemates will have something to do with his final point totals.
I can see them having the same kind of trajectory poitnwise, even though i believe Roy will be better, Toffoli's game is based on being at the right place at the right time and a quick release. Roy will create way more plays by himself.Joshua Roy show his top 6 NHL potential so far in AHL. A Tyler Toffoli type of career from him, will be very good for Habs. So far, he show that he can become that type of player. Toffoli, smart, good shot, good hands, good hockey IQ and great two-way game aswell. I'm a big fan of Toffoli, so having that type of player in Habs system, that's a huge win.
OK, but who thinks it means nothing that Logan Mailloux is -7 and Jayden Struble +6 in just 4 games?
But you inadvertently make a point against your own agument. By citing Roy as an example of what Farrell, Heineman, and Mailloux need to develop (an NHL level teammate in your opinion), you shine the light on what is wrong with the idea that good playerss need to play on the 5th-6th-7th lines to develop properly for an NHL role.
Yes and looked what happens to themWe’ve rushed 18 yr olds that weren’t close to being ready. Roy is 20, dominated juniors last 2 years and is dominating the AHL, confidence isn’t a problem and we have several options to get him into the top 6
But it's not 4 games. Mailloux has been suspect defensively for years. The -7 just confirms that.Me. 4 games is 4 games, for better or worse.
The best reason for Roy to be in the AHL is to learn as a player, not to semi-coach others.Roy is turning out to be a dominant AHL player and he benefits other young players down in Laval at the moment. Which IMO is the best argument for keeping him in Laval at this point.
The best reason for Roy to be in the AHL is to learn as a player, not to semi-coach others.
Agree to disagree on the reason, but I do want him there to learn the things he needs to learn.
But it's not 4 games. Mailloux has been suspect defensively for years. The -7 just confirms that.
Struble looked like a solid 2-way guy later last year in Laval. The +6 just confirms that.
Sure, but the context matters. It doesn't mean nothing BECAUSE it is around the norm for these guys.Variance doesn't go away just because you had prior beliefs about something. Your question was ''who thinks that Logan being -7 and Jayden Struble being +6 after 4 games means nothing?'' These aren't a magic 4 games that are meaningful where other 4 games aren't. 4 games either has meaning, or it doesn't. It doesn't because literally anything can happen in 4 games, anything at all, you name it.