Sorge Georos
Registered User
The similarities I see:
- highly skilled players who fell in their draft year
- questionmarks on work ethic and all-around play
- unspectacular statistics for offense-first players (Ho-Sang scored only 17 goals in the year after he was drafted)
- both are very flashy players, like Schremp-exciting, not exactly prototypical NHL players
- Kabanov is taller, both are small-ish players though that won't be puck-battlers against NHL players.
I know Isles fans may hate the comparison because Kabanov didn't work out, but if you don't see similarities, you aren't looking close enough.
If Ho-Sang makes it as an NHL player, he'll need to be much stronger and needs to produce offensively. 17 goals ain't going to cut it. IMO, Ho-Sang needs to have a big offensive year next year, 100pts or close to it and then turn pro and impress at the AHL level, at least a year (of course, much depends on his performance).
Kabanov was really good in the playoffs and memorial cup, put up big points, scored some big goals. It was at the pro-level where he really disappointed.
You're one of the best posters here so you get a mulligan for this one...
But comparing Ho-Sang to Kabanov/Schremp is about on par with comparing Okposo and every half-black player to Jarome Iginla.
Lazy, lazy comparison.
There are penty of cocky players who fail and plenty of cocky players who succeed. For the latter we call it competitiveness (Michael Jordan) and the former it's just plain bad attitude. The real reason those guys failed? They weren't talented enough. There's nothing inherently wrong with being a flashy stickhandler. They were just not good hockey players who lacked Ho-Sang's speed and athleticism.
Schremp would still be in the league if he were half as fast as Ho-Sang.