Figgy44
A toast of purple gato for the memories
- Dec 15, 2014
- 13,893
- 9,203
Depends if they want to get any value out of him or simply dump the contract at negative value.
Keep in mind, teams were asking the Canucks for a sweetener to take Garland who only had five points less than Huberdeau at 5M and with a much shorter contract
The cap is going up though and unlike the Canucks trying to get a replacement for Garland to compete right away/sign extensions, the Flames are OK in just keeping Huberdeau until a more opportune moment it available.
The contradiction is that many outsiders think Huberdeau is completely useless as a player. He's overpaid but not useless. Then they think we should get rid of him for the rebuild use assets to get rid of him. That makes no sense. Either he helps the rebuild and we don't need to move him or we move him because he gives assets great for the rebuild. It shouldn't be both or neither.