lol. No big deal. I feel dirty for laughing at it.Yuck, ya sorry, bad verbiage
lol. No big deal. I feel dirty for laughing at it.Yuck, ya sorry, bad verbiage
Great point, climate also for sure.Its also the climate.
When I see someone cycling in the winter with ski goggles on, while the road is 2m more narrow on either side thanks to massive snow drifts, it makes me wonder.
The answer is almost certainly that he’s just an entitled, selfish shitbag, which would also have a lot to do with his decision to drive drunk in the first place.
Is there ever a good time?Do you tell your children that right after getting them back from being abducted by a stranger?
Do you tell people to hike in groups when they're in the hospital after being mauled by a mountain lion?
This isn't directed at you but there's people in this thread who've made endless posts trying to justify how focusing on the ways the Gaudreau's may have put themselves in a dangerous situation isn't victim blaming. What exactly is it they think they're accomplishing? Do they really think this is the place and time to talk about bike safety?
No matter how much they deny it, the most obvious implication is "yes but..." They were hit by a drunk driver. Yes but.. by cycling on a rural road at dusk they put themselves in danger. Like, what other f***ing point could there be to make?
Two young men were just killed while biking. But they think someone needs to point out right now that it can be dangerous?
Seriously people. Do a little f***ing self reflection. Go read the posts from Gaudreau's family. Go look at all the tributes. Then go back and read your stupid posts about bike safety and walking in the park at night analogies. See how you feel about them.
Essentially “why are some people the way they are?” - always a valid question, but unfortunately, there’s never a good answer.It’s hard to come up with a scenario where he’s not a shitbag, and somehow still finds himself weaving through cars on a rural road while pounding his 7th beer and killing two people.
In UK they are handing out 2 years for offensive memes, here we can't jail drunks and texters?Well the 2 counts of vehicular manslaughter carry a max term of 10 yrs each. If the judge makes it concurrent, it’s 10 yrs max, 7/8 yrs max. When this trial is done and over, there will be a lot of dissapointed people on the sentence I’m thinking.
It’s not particularly intuitive to swerve right when someone cuts in front of you. The intuitive thing would be to brake.
One thing is sure, athletes who make a lot of money, nhlers specifically, who have biked on the road will be thinking twice. You can bike on the road lawfully, but you’re putting your life at the hands of the driver. Just takes one bad decision by someone.
Being that this was at night, I’m wondering if the brothers were wearing any reflective gear or lights, that might be an angle for the defence.
Im not defending his actions at all I just am questioning if the punishment fits the crime among some posts here.Not sure how that makes any kind of sense, but okay. Stick to defending the wreckless remorseless murderer, I guess.
I guess that was the main part of my point and I appreciate you recognizing it.More people have driven under the influence than will admit it. Drinking a few drinks and then driving is a pretty big societal norm in North America
i agree that measures need to be taken to ensure it doesn’t happen again but I would stop far short of killing himI would take solace, however insignificant, that he never has another opportunity to do this again.
I’m not for capital punishment, but some cases deserve harsher punishments than similar cases. The fact he was literally drinking while driving is so far beyond the realm of “oopsie”. You can convince yourself you’re ok to drive and rationalize it internally, but if you still can’t stop drinking to the point where you have to continue doing it while operating a motor vehicle, well I have far less compassion.Im not defending his actions at all I just am questioning if the punishment fits the crime among some posts here.
More people have driven under the influence than will admit it. Drinking a few drinks and then driving is a pretty big societal norm in North America
I have and regret it. I was under 21 years old. I drove super careful because I knew what I was doing was wrong. Even with that, it was probably less than this guy.More people have driven under the influence than will admit it. Drinking a few drinks and then driving is a pretty big societal norm in North America
50 mph in USA is 80.4 km/h. Just for our friends in other parts of the world.Didn't see that in the police report, but the speed limit is 50 and iirc it said the two other cars were already slowed down for the bikers, when the drunk driver approached from behind "at a high rate of speed", which may or may not have been around the speed limit given the context of the other cars having slowed down. But given the drunk drivers history, it may well have been over the speed limit too.
Speaking from experience, I won't get into details, but you could not be more right.A few drinks is over the limit unless he's 400 pounds.
And no, admitting to his faults doesn't mean anything. You think the driver who killed the Gaudreaus isn't sorry now?
I can rollerblade on icy conditions. Just got to slow down.Great point, climate also for sure.
The Dutch are legitimately insane and will bike through a monsoon in November but that's still a far cry from trying to bike when it's -23 and the roads are icy and snow covered in Ontario. Biking as the primary means of transport as it is here doesn't apply to great lake winters.
One shouldn't be driving at a high speed in the first place. What is intuitive for you may be unintuitive for someone else and vice versa.I don't think it was a situation where he was cut off last second and tried to avoid an accident, but I don't think it's entirely unintuitive either if you're cut off to swerve into where the most road is in an attempt to avoid an accident. Braking is one route you can go, but depending on the distance and the speed, braking still may result in an accident. If you think you can avoid an accident entirely by swerving right, that seems at least somewhat intuitive.
I don't think that's what happened here at all, but I don't think the only option is to just slam on the brakes either.
That said, I also want to make it perfectly clear (to others, not you) that I am in no way defending the drunk driver's actions or decisions, I am simply having a discussion about a hypothetical with this post.
In this specific case, I agree with you that the drunk driver made a reckless and indefensible decision to try to pass on the right because he felt slighted by the front car, and that's why he needs to be held accountable for this.
In the United States, yes. North America is a continent and every country will have different laws.Is the BAC limit in North America really still 0.08%? I’ve been in Australia last 15 years so just been used to 0.05, assumed other places had come to their senses.
Hopefully some change and awareness can come out of this tragic event. Your planning changes drastically when you know you can only have 2 drinks before being illegal behind the wheel, either you skip it all together or organize DDs or Ubers.
I saw a 90% reduction in the after work/sporting event drinkers pushing the boundaries coming here from Calgary and they have check stops everywhere
Forget the fact that they're athletes. He killed two people because of his reckless and selfish behavior and he was in trouble for it before. Everyone knows better than to drink and drive but when you get caught for it, you should be smarter about it even more. He killed two people and acted like it was an inconvenience he was stuck in jail longer because of a long weekend. Well being stuck in jail is gonna be his norm, because f*** him.Do you think he knows the gravitas of the situation? That he killed an athlete who made millions of dollars? Feels like he’s acting like he just ran over two random nobodies.