tlk
hARry kane comeS homE
yeah, "disorder"substance abuse disorder
yeah, "disorder"substance abuse disorder
Believe it or not, this checks out.I checked his Facebook, veteran, two very young daughters with him in almost all his pics, donating to charities. But yeah, everything you said can also be true at the same time.
I would be in favour for a 0 tolerance limit on alcohol. If you drink even a small glass, don't drive.
It won't eliminate the problem fully, but it might scare some people enough to reduce the problem.
Unless the reason for the limits is linked to the accuracy of the instruments to measure alcohol levels. But there's not reason to allow people to drive even if it's "a little bit". Because no one knows what their blood level is at, it leaves people responsible to decide if they drank enough or not - and something so dangerous to be left to the interpretation of people under influence is ridiculous.
I uhh, are you sure its the same guy? There is another Sean Higgins with a lot of charitable donation and two daughters who said it wasnt him involved last night.I checked his Facebook, veteran, two very young daughters with him in almost all his pics, donating to charities. But yeah, everything you said can also be true at the same time.
Personally, I don't think enough is done to educate people who are high-risk for alcohol abuse, or to educate people about the warning signs that they may be falling into alcohol addiction. Though I do understand skepticism toward the efficacy of more education considering how alcohol is accepted and promoted in our society.Alcohol is just the absolute worst substance out there, too. I don't know how much more people can be educated on the dangers of alcohol abuse or drunk driving, but treatment for sure.
I never understood why booze was always such a common and widely acceptable substance
Unfortunately, that doesn't constitute "murder."Well he "purposefully" went out of his way to drive on the shoulder and ended up killing two people, so call it whatever you want.
Absolutely not. And I say this as someone who was hit by a driver so drunk he passed out with his foot on the gas, t-boning me. You know what happened to him? Not a f***ing thing. I called the cops several times, nobody ever showed up. This prick lives a couple blocks away from me, I'd see him driving to work almost every day even after the crash.I would be in favour for a 0 tolerance limit on alcohol. If you drink even a small glass, don't drive.
It won't eliminate the problem fully, but it might scare some people enough to reduce the problem.
Unless the reason for the limits is linked to the accuracy of the instruments to measure alcohol levels. But there's not reason to allow people to drive even if it's "a little bit". Because no one knows what their blood level is at, it leaves people responsible to decide if they drank enough or not - and something so dangerous to be left to the interpretation of people under influence is ridiculous.
I’m sure he had life insurance, and probably also accidental death or dismemberment. I’m sure his family will be taken care of one way or another.Out of curiosity is there some sort of insurance or something for his contract for his family?
1-2 drinks, on average, isn't a lot of alcohol if you also wait a while (like an hour or 2) before driving.Absolutely devastating, tragic and incomprehensible. My heart is aching for their family. This will be felt for generations for them. Just heart wrenching.
If the rumblings are true, it's even worse. For anyone that ever has a buddy that's had even 1 or 2 drinks and they say "I'm ok to drive", slap him in the head and take his keys. If that doesn't work slap him again, wrestle him to the ground, take his keys, and throw them far into a deep lake. It may cost you a friendship, but you're probably saving someone's life.
Alcohol is just the absolute worst substance out there, too. I don't know how much more people can be educated on the dangers of alcohol abuse or drunk driving, but treatment for sure.
I never understood why booze was always such a common and widely acceptable substance
not to distract from the tragedy but Md changed/added a law like 2017ish where you are allowed to pass a left turning car when a shoulder or pavement is present to the right but your not required to. Of course because of human nature this has evolved to people passing on the right at full speed around multiple cars waiting for a turning vehicle. The road I live off of is one lane each direction with a wide shoulder. In good weather you will see many bicyclists riding these shoulders. A few months ago sadly someone was hit in just this fashion and passed. This law has also allowed people to believe they can pass left turning vehicles at a traffic light. Logically on a one lane road where cars in opposing directions are both turning left this creates a very dangerous situation where the "shoulder riders" as they've come to be known are hitting these left turning vehicles. Happened just outside my house a month ago or so. im in the old man yelling at a cloud category but I dont see why we are in such a hurry that everyone on the road has to be endangered by this practice.What law is that?
The human centipede is the only punishment for this guy and those who drink and driveThe more I read about it, the more f***ing mad I get. The rest of his natural life in jail. Throw the book at him.
Nope.@Laus723 did you mean to laugh at this?
I checked his Facebook, veteran, two very young daughters with him in almost all his pics, donating to charities. But yeah, everything you said can also be true at the same time.
That's fair.Personally, I don't think enough is done to educate people who are high-risk for alcohol abuse, or to educate people about the warning signs that they may be falling into alcohol addiction. Though I do understand skepticism toward the efficacy of more education considering how alcohol is accepted and promoted in our society.
Here come the insane hot takes.I would be in favour for a 0 tolerance limit on alcohol. If you drink even a small glass, don't drive.
It won't eliminate the problem fully, but it might scare some people enough to reduce the problem.
Unless the reason for the limits is linked to the accuracy of the instruments to measure alcohol levels. But there's not reason to allow people to drive even if it's "a little bit". Because no one knows what their blood level is at, it leaves people responsible to decide if they drank enough or not - and something so dangerous to be left to the interpretation of people under influence is ridiculous.