2nd behind Landeskog.
I am a huge fan of Landeskog but I take Gaudreau over him. Admittedly Landeskog brings some things with his skill set that Johnny doesn't.
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server2nd behind Landeskog.
Regardless as to what you say about his durability, it has yet to be seen.
Usually players with durability issues show signs of those issues before the NHL. Gaudreau hasn't.
His size has very little to do with durability. It's an oft tossed around idea that I'm not sure is even all that true. I'd love to see data that supports smaller players getting hurt on a higher basis than bigger players.
Also, every player is a hit away from a major injury. Size really has nothing to do with it.
This is the evolution of your camp's thinking, and by that I mean many, but not all, Canucks fans:
-Gaudreau won't be able to make the team, he's too small.
-Gaudreau won't be able to compete against "real" NHL'ers, he's too small.
-Gaudreau won't be able to compete against proper NHL D-men, he's too small.
-Now that proper NHL D-men have played against Gaudreau, he won't be able to compete; he's too small.
- Inevitably, Gaudreau will suffer a career-ending injury.
It's been quite a thing to behold, really.
"my camp's thinking"? Really now. I have not said any of the above thanks. The only thing I was stating, was if Johnny goes down (length depending), your team won't make the big dance, that's all. If anything, that would mean I am calling him your teams best player (which I feel is true).![]()
Ok, you guys win, size has NOTHING to do with it.![]()
Show me evidence that supports your theory that size and propensity to injury are related.
I never made a "theory", and am not even arguing about whatever it is you are trying to point out.
I have never said anything about size mattering regarding concussions (which some of you are trying to imply I am).
A player who is 6'3-220lbs v.s a player who is 5'9-150lbs. Who is most likely to take the same hit better?
You guys seem very defensive about my original comment. I have nothing to argue with you guys about here haha. Like I said before, I think Johnny is your best player. What exactly is your guys issue here?
This question is misleading, though, because the bigger player would not take the same hits as the smaller player. That's not how it works in reality.
It's not about being defensive, it's about preventing ridiculous concepts from being perpetuated wherever possible.
Ryan Strome will be better than them all and possibly bunch of other guys...
Kucherov..
This thread is too funny, size DOES matter in this league.
I don't know/care about whatever nonsense you are arguing about. you have a right to your opinion, I am not arguing it.
I think your team would be in far more trouble without Jonny, as you would be without Gio again.
Good day![]()
Of course size matters for teams. You need a mix. Too many big guys, and other teams can skate you into the ground. Too many small players and the other team can impose their will physically.
For individual players, size matters in that smaller players have a harder task to become valuable players. Part of the game is winning physical battles. If you aren't going to win any physical battles, you need to be pretty damn good at everything else to make up for it. Luckily, Johnny is, so with that being a given, his size doesn't really matter.
I don't understand why you'd come into a thread, say something, then when people engage you in discussion claim you don't care about it and flee away. We're responding to your point. If you don't know what that is, I don't know what to tell you.![]()
This question is misleading, though, because the bigger player would not take the same hits as the smaller player. That's not how it works in reality. Of course the bigger player has a better likelihood of surviving a big hit than a smaller player. Now, based on that, what does Johnny's ability to stay healthy for 5 straight years as a small player tell you about his ability to avoid big hits?
It's not about being defensive, it's about preventing ridiculous concepts from being perpetuated wherever possible.
My opinion is backed up by what happened to you guys from the much BIGGER team in the Ducks, last playoffs.
What happened to the even bigger Jets last season? Oh yeah, they got swept by the Ducks...Hear me out, because this might seem crazy, but it's almost like the Ducks were a really good team that happened to have size.
My opinion is backed up by what happened to you guys from the much BIGGER team in the Ducks, last playoffs. I was still on here commenting, because I was reading he could get the Art Ross, avoid damage like Wayne Gretzky, have a PPG season. I disagreed, and you started going off about how Johnny's size does not matter.
I was not "fleeing" anything. I am just tired of going on about it. You have your opinion on Johnny, as do I. What's so hard to understand? This conversation is pointless. Good day.![]()
A player can only avoid so many hits. There's lots of borderline/cheap players in this league who might catch him unaware. But I do agree with your sentiment that in general, how Gaudreau takes a hit is irrelevant because he almost never does.
I am pretty sure he meant eventually, not this season in particular.You guys are funny. The Art Ross comment after 2 games, is rich. It was kind of hard for me not to laugh. My bad.
Here's Johnny at age 9 in Edmonton of all places, he was the tourney MVP