LeBrun: - John Carlson not returning to Anaheim | Page 3 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

LeBrun: John Carlson not returning to Anaheim

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
Care to explain your reasoning for this comment? All deadline rentals are essentially a waste if the idea is cup or bust. The Ducks young core gained valuable experience making it to the second round and even giving Vegas a better fight than Colorado did. They may not have even had that opportunity if it weren’t for acquiring JC.

The reasoning is that the Ducks aren't quite there yet and shouldn't be dealing quality picks for 36 year old rentals.

Carlson wasn't great in the playoffs and it would have been smarter to deal that pick for someone who would have helped beyond this season (eg. Parayko).
 
The reasoning is that the Ducks aren't quite there yet and shouldn't be dealing quality picks for 36 year old rentals.

Carlson wasn't great in the playoffs and it would have been smarter to deal that pick for someone who would have helped beyond this season (eg. Parayko).

Not sure that the Ducks even would have made the playoffs without Carlson's production post deadline. That run was invaluable experience for our young core and for that reason I'm fine (but not thrilled) with the trade.

There seems to be a lot of indication that the Ducks were pushing for Parayko and then likely pivoted to Carlson late in the deadline process when that didn't work out. I wanted Parayko and don't disagree that it would have been a been a better fit.
 
Not sure that the Ducks even would have made the playoffs without Carlson's production post deadline. That run was invaluable experience for our young core and for that reason I'm fine (but not thrilled with) the trade.

There seems to be a lot of indication that the Ducks were pushing for Parayko and then likely pivoted to Carlson late in the deadline process when that didn't work out. I wanted Parayko and don't disagree that it would have been a been a better fit.
+1000
 
The reasoning is that the Ducks aren't quite there yet and shouldn't be dealing quality picks for 36 year old rentals.

Carlson wasn't great in the playoffs and it would have been smarter to deal that pick for someone who would have helped beyond this season (eg. Parayko).
+1000
-I'm neutral on the Carlson rental. Maybe he helped the Ducks get into the playoffs, and that experience is invaluable, but maybe they would have gotten in without him, too. And Verbeek could have packaged that 1st for someone like Parayko that will be with the Ducks for several seasons.
-Carlson was awful against Vegas. He's slow and his legs are gone.
-He's not worth $10M x 2 imo, good luck to Philly or whomever gets him!
 
Carlson's leadership, aura, and teachings were never a waste of a mid-1st rd pick.
Plus the clear signal from management/owner that they're willing to invest in the team to make them better 'now' rather than selling off assets at the TDL. That's hard to quantify but it's far from meaningless.

Moving on is probably for the best. He was great when he initially arrived but that can be explained by new team/new situation bounce. Further on into the playoffs he just looked worn out. With the team so young and fast, if he stayed he'd probably be worn out/worn down late into next season before the playoffs. Father time is cruel at times. Appreciate what he brought, wish him nothing but the best, and reasonably glad he's not coming back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Fedorov
The reasoning is that the Ducks aren't quite there yet and shouldn't be dealing quality picks for 36 year old rentals.

Carlson wasn't great in the playoffs and it would have been smarter to deal that pick for someone who would have helped beyond this season (eg. Parayko).
I agree that it would’ve been smarter to have used the pick on someone with term. However, Parayko, as you suggested, would’ve cost much more. The rumor was that they wanted a 1st and top prospect or player like Minty. It’s one thing to deal a mid first away and another to deal it away with a recent 10th overall who’s starting to look like he’s turning a corner. And I’m not sure what you mean by “not there yet”. They made it just as far as other teams who are “already there”. Sure, they need to improve still, but without a doubt, that experience was very valuable and worth a mid first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emerald Duck
My guess is Washington's best offer is 2 x $9M, he's off PP1 and they want his minutes down closer to 20/game.

Don't think he goes for that, especially now that the band-aid is ripped off.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad