Maybe Zemgus Girgensons can be a target to play alongside Demidov then!You never have enough 'sons
Maybe Zemgus Girgensons can be a target to play alongside Demidov then!You never have enough 'sons
Not sure that the Ducks even would have made the playoffs without Carlson's production post deadline. That run was invaluable experience for our young core and for that reason I'm fine (but not thrilled) with the trade.
There seems to be a lot of indication that the Ducks were pushing for Parayko and then likely pivoted to Carlson late in the deadline process when that didn't work out. I wanted Parayko and don't disagree that it would have been a been a better fit.
I'm not seeing it. Cole Hutson and Jacob Chychrun will QB the Caps PP going forward. Caps need is more mobile d-men. Carlson is a slow skater to what they need to improve on.I thought this was a wink and a handshake trade for Washington and Carlson. I still think that’s the case
It depends on what you mean by botched, right?Rationalizing the Carlson trade as a good thing is like rationalizing a botched vasectomy as a good thing. The facts say otherwise.
How wasnt it good?Rationalizing the Carlson trade as a good thing is like rationalizing a botched vasectomy as a good thing. The facts say otherwise.
Lol i know you are joking but there is discussions about nurse on the anaheim boards, personally i dont see it.... maybe if he was a RHDmaking room for Darnell Nurse
The Ducks were in 1st place the day the trade was made. They finished in 3rd.How wasnt it good?
We made the playoffs, we won a round and we played competitive games in round 2.
The Ducks were in 1st place the day the trade was made. They finished in 3rd.
The Ducks had a better record percentage-wise without Carlson than with him by a fair bit.
OTOH, you can't point to Carlson as being a legitimate factor in any of the points you mentioned. All could just as easily been achieved without him. We'll never know.
Bottom line....the FACTS are not on your side. Neither is critical thinking.
Just stating facts that the fanboys don’t like to hear. The facts say he didn’t improve the team. Anything beyond those facts is supposition that could be argued either way with no resolution.OTOH they went in the tank when Mintyukov and Gudas were out, and Gauthier got his vertebrae cracked. So it's not really a fair comparison.
You're basically arguing that he was a negative impact player. But we cannot know for sure if they'd have been worse without him if those same injuries happen.
Didn't he get a hat trick in one of their few wins down the stretch against a direct competitor? That's a 4 point swing right there.
We're all spinning hypotheticals. No need to be pissy about it.
Lol "fanboys"Just stating facts that the fanboys don’t like to hear. The facts say he didn’t improve the team. Anything beyond those facts is supposition that could be argued either way with no resolution.
Just stating facts that the fanboys don’t like to hear. The facts say he didn’t improve the team.
Anything beyond those facts is supposition that could be argued either way with no resolution.
So because they met YOUR expectations it’s a good trade. Got it.Lol "fanboys"
Thats the nice thing about sports(hockey), facts dont always tell the whole story.
You asked what my expectations were when we made the trade, i said 2nd round and playing competitive.... we got there.
I dont think Carlson is the right move long term, so im glad were not bringing him back.... but i was more than okay spending a 1st on insurance for the team to get some playoff experience.
I enjoyed the end of the season and playoffs and happy with the growth of the team , my guess is you sat there hoping theyd lose so you could celebrate the trade not being a success in your eyes... sad way to be a fan tbh.
probably could have done that without himHow wasnt it good?
We made the playoffs, we won a round and we played competitive games in round 2.
We can make an enticing package without a 1st, if we want to go that routeprobably could have done that without him
mctavish 1st and 3rd for larkin pretty enticing package.
I imagine it met the team/mangement expectations also.So because they met YOUR expectations it’s a good trade. Got it.
The Ducks would be following the LA Kings 2021-22 playbook to the letter. What could go wrong?probably could have done that without him
mctavish 1st and 3rd for larkin pretty enticing package.
Rationalizing the Carlson trade as a good thing is like rationalizing a botched vasectomy as a good thing. The facts say otherwise.
Actually it would meet the expectations of an owner desperate to make the playoffs and telling his GM to do whatever it took to do it.I imagine it met the team/mangement expectations also.
I think PV values the young guys getting those meaningful game expierence.
What the “facts” don’t say is whether Carlson was the reason they got there. He sure was a big reason why they didn’t get past the 2nd round.The “facts” say that Anaheim got halfway through the second round of the playoffs. One would suggest that the added experience was a great benefit to the young core.
I’m curious what facts you’re referring to that say it was a poor decision.
Is this based on facts?Actually it would meet the expectations of an owner desperate to make the playoffs and telling his GM to do whatever it took to do it.
Nope. But once Samueli mandated the playoffs it was only a matter of time before the stupid began. I’m expecting a lot more stupid this summer. Verbeek will be doing his best Rob Blake impersonation if I’m correct.Is this based on facts?