The Great Weal
Phil's Pizza
- Jan 15, 2015
- 55,165
- 70,853
Why would we? We aren't trying to compete. Gallagher on the other hand is a different story.Would you give up Flames first for a team to claim Armia?
Why would we? We aren't trying to compete. Gallagher on the other hand is a different story.Would you give up Flames first for a team to claim Armia?
Laval................if he doesn't report, he gets suspended...
He will report, 3.4M is a lot of $$$
Forgot about that................like Bgally is 8 and 9M this year and next.........ahhh MB, what a guy.Not 3.4 hes making 4.8M in real cash
Flexing molson money right out of his biceps he was!Forgot about that................like Bgally is 8 and 9M this year and next.........ahhh MB, what a guy.
Well....that's embarrassing...No!!! Stop.
They are not using LTIR today, and certainly not on a player who is coming back soon.
Here is one of many solutions:
Start with 28 players.
Demote RHP, Guhle and Harris on paper.
Actually demote Heineman, Norlinder and Barron so they can play.
Down to 22 including Price. We are under the cap.
Tomorrow, put Dvo and Wideman on IR and Price on LTIR.
Now 19 healthy players.
Recall RHP, Guhle, Harris and one other D to be #7
23 player active roster, 1 spare of each position F-D-G
Well....that's embarrassing...
Yep, Armia sent down and Xhekaj recalled.Well the way Habs are doing works too.
Wideman on LTIR tomorrow, Armia to AHL and you call back Xhekaj. We have a cap hit of $44,584.
When you need to call up somebody else, Price on LTIR and we gain a lot of cap space. ($10,932,084)
Agreed. Hats off to you, and I learned something today though I am not sure of all of the whys and hows.Well....that's embarrassing...
Petry is still a good NHL player, but Armia stinks. There is nothing really else to it. I don't agree with the approach on the Petry trade, but these aren't similar situations at all.I'll wait to see what actually comes of this long-term (maybe they just tried to see who bites on waivers or are just sending a message, then when we put Price on LTIR and do all our cap shenanigans he comes back up), but if the plan is to bury him for the last two years then I'm confused and disappointed in the reactions here.
We went out of our way to do Petry a solid. Retained 50% for multiple years and sent him to his preferred destination while getting nothing of value in return. For a guy who completely mailed it in at the end of his time here and DEMANDED a trade out of Montreal.
Now we have another vet in Armia who hasn't said a single bad word about the org or about being benched, stayed through some tough seasons that Petry wanted no part of, and the plan is to bury him in the AHL for two years and effectively end his NHL career? To try and put pressure on him to mutually terminate his contract if he wants a shot on another team?
What happened to all that talk about developing a positive rep with the players? Why does that only apply to Petry and not Armia?
Fully agreed.I'll wait to see what actually comes of this long-term (maybe they just tried to see who bites on waivers or are just sending a message, then when we put Price on LTIR and do all our cap shenanigans he comes back up), but if the plan is to bury him for the last two years then I'm confused and disappointed in the reactions here.
We went out of our way to do Petry a solid. Retained 50% for multiple years and sent him to his preferred destination while getting nothing of value in return. For a guy who completely mailed it in at the end of his time here and DEMANDED a trade out of Montreal.
Now we have another vet in Armia who hasn't said a single bad word about the org or about being benched, stayed through some tough seasons that Petry wanted no part of, and the plan is to bury him in the AHL for two years and effectively end his NHL career? To try and put pressure on him to mutually terminate his contract if he wants a shot on another team?
What happened to all that talk about developing a positive rep with the players? Why does that only apply to Petry and not Armia?
Since Dvorak is already on LTIR, no harm to add Price, but it is totally pointless. He's probably going to be put there once Dvorak is ready to return.That being said, is there any harm to Price going on LTIR tomorrow?
No!!! Stop.
They are not using LTIR today, and certainly not on a player who is coming back soon.
Here is one of many solutions:
Start with 28 players.
Demote RHP, Guhle and Harris on paper.
Actually demote Heineman, Norlinder and Barron so they can play.
Down to 22 including Price. We are under the cap.
Tomorrow, put Dvo and Wideman on IR and Price on LTIR.
Now 19 healthy players.
Recall RHP, Guhle, Harris and one other D to be #7
23 player active roster, 1 spare of each position F-D-G
Since Dvorak is already on LTIR, no harm to add Price, but it is totally pointless. He's probably going to be put there once Dvorak is ready to return.
Fully agreed.
From my perspective, sending Armia to Laval is not a bad thing for reputation : you are paid like a third liner, but are not Playing at the required level, you should be demoted. However, when you retain on Petry for two years at a cost of a 4th (while the cost of retention alone would likely be a 2nd) because you want to do good that by him, now that sets double standards…
Having LTIR stop you from accruing cap space regardless if it is pre or in season, having a player on LTIR freeze it. Pre-season LTIR freeze at $0, in-season freeze it where ever they are at. You need to remove LTIR entirely during the season to be able to accrue cap space again (it's recalculated but I don't know the maths).You want to back trace your steps on the the "No, Stop" narrative? Learning lessons there.
It's not pointless IMO. Moving Price to LTIR actually gives us more cap space because it can accrue in the time Dvorak is still out.
Right now, we either have $1M or $2M in cap space (not sure if we are saving a $1M with Armia or not), and that can't accrue because Dvorak was used as a LTIR contract before the season. Moving Price to LTIR with the larger contract changes the formula.
Very similar to when Weber was on LTIR before the season and then Price after the season. 2 or 3 seasons ago now?
Having LTIR stop you from accruing cap space regardless if it is pre or in season, having a player on LTIR freeze it. Pre-season LTIR freeze at $0, in-season freeze it where ever they are at. You need to remove LTIR entirely during the season to be able to accrue cap space again (it's recalculated but I don't know the maths).
Teams do not really accrue cap space when LTIR is in use. They get a ACSL (Accruable Cap Space Limit) which is calculated and frozen when the first player is put on LTIR.I don't think you got this understood correctly. And I'm going to fail in explaining it.
Do you remember when Weber was on LTIR before the season and then Price was placed after the season? That allowed us to accrue cap space. Think about it more and I'm sure others will chime in
So if I understand correctly, the reason we did not mind putting Dvorak on pre-season LTIR is that we needed $87.840M to accommodate the 23 guys the club wants on the team, plus Wideman and Price.Teams do not really accrue cap space when LTIR is in use. They get a ACSL (Accruable Cap Space Limit) which is calculated and frozen when the first player is put on LTIR.
So you "we were accruing cap space with Price" was just filling up the pre-defined ACSL bucket.
You want to back trace your steps on the the "No, Stop" narrative? Learning lessons there.
It's not pointless IMO. Moving Price to LTIR actually gives us more cap space because it can accrue in the time Dvorak is still out.
Right now, we either have $1M or $2M in cap space (not sure if we are saving a $1M with Armia or not),
and that can't accrue because Dvorak was used as a LTIR contract before the season. Moving Price to LTIR with the larger contract changes the formula.
Sort of. Only Weber never returned. Dvorak hopefully will. Am I on track now?Very similar to when Weber was on LTIR before the season and then Price after the season. 2 or 3 seasons ago now?
He will eventually get his game back. He won't play in Montreal again but he could salvage his career.Interesting observation by Stéphane Leroux about Armia’s demotion.
Leroux affirme que Armia, qui touchera 4.8 millions de dollars en salaire cette saison, aura un incitatif supplémentaire à se présenter aux matchs du Rocket s'il y demeure. Puisqu'il évoluera dans la Ligue Américaine, il n'aura pas à contribuer le 6% de son salaire au fond de l'Escrow des joueurs de la LNH. Pour lui, ça représente une économie de 288 000$ directement dans ses poches.
Leroux says that Armia will have an additional incentive in playing for the Rocket. He’s making 4.8 M however, by playing in the AHL, he won’t have to contribute 6% of his salary to the NHL’s escrow fund, which will net him a sum of $288,000 over the season that he would have otherwise had to pay.
This guy has zero incentive to get out of his deal. He just found a way of making even more dough!
I'm not so sure about that, if the team is getting several injuries like last year, Armia will be back at some point.He will eventually get his game back. He won't play in Montreal again but he could salvage his career.