Captain Mountain
Formerly Captain Wolverine
- Jun 6, 2010
- 21,135
- 15,274
Getting rid of 6.5 million in dead cap space for 3 years after his season is not an emotional decision. In fact, deciding to keep Gallagher for his past contributions is an emotional decision.
Yes he is that bad, he is awful.
I mean if you think we will still be a bottom 5 team for the next 4 years then sure you might as well keep Gally, but they obviously want to start making a push for the playoffs sometime soon. Suzuki will be 29 years old when Gallagher's contract ends, they obviously want to capitalize on his younger years rather than trying to make the playoffs when he's in his 30s.
Gallagher is currently on the 3rd line so no, it wouldn't be mismanagement at all to give Roy/Farrell/Heineman a chance in the top 9. Development isn't top 6 ice time or bust.
Saying it over and over again doesn't make it not emotional.
Lets run through your scenario. You say that Gallagher is awful and you want to give a late 1st to move Gallagher. You want to wait until you know if the pick will be low or not. So:
1) The trade can't really happen before the 2025 deadline unless Calgary and Florida are both dominant, but would either way happen during the 2024-2025 season at earliest.
2) That means the cap space benefit is more for the 2025 and 2026 off-seasons. Montreal is projected to have somewhere between 40 mil and 60 mil in cap space for those offseason's (before accounting for Price's contract). Obviously that space will go down as Montreal re-signs guys, but they don't really have guys up for contracts in the next few years that would require that space. It would be hard for even a guy like Bergevin to bungle that much cap space.
3) We know that current Habs management has no issue giving vets less playtime if their play warrants it (see: Armia, Joel). Hell, Gallagher already played less on the PP last season than he has in his career and its likely that only goes down.
4) Gallagher is on the 3rd line now. I'm not sure why you think he'll be on the 3rd line in 3 years (or even next season).
5) The team would still want veterans around (like literally any NHL team). They have 3 forwards 25 or older in the top-9, and one of those guys is clear trade bait. Gallagher is the only guy over 30 in the top 9. Going with an entire team of early to mid 20s players isn't a thing that any NHL team is going to do.
6) Again, Gallagher is injury prone and other injuries happen too. Roy/Farrell/Heineman will get a chance in the top 9 whether Gallagher is around or not. Its up to them to earn a spot.
So yeah, it would definitely be an emotional decision. Montreal doesn't need the capspace, Gallagher is not going to stop guys from getting opportunities and he wouldn't block Montreal being competitive. Just like how Dustin Brown didn't prevent LA from being competitive.