H
Worth a shot, but I'd be very skeptical about Talbot being any kind of upgrade. AHL numbers look pretty similar to Pavelec and Montoya. Might be a late bloomer, might not.
Wouldn't give up more than a third round pick for him.
Talbot is an interesting case. Coming out of U of Alabama-Huntsville I kinda dismissed him completely. But he has shown very consistent AHL improvement (.902 in 22gp - .913 in 33gp - .918 in 55gp - .924 in 5gp).
He's not overly athlethic, but a big blocking goalie in the mold of a Montoya. Only makes 562K (signed for next season as well). I'd be ok with taking a flyer on him. But yeah prob 3rd round pick is the most I'd give. Doubt NYR would trade him though, he has been great insurance for Lundqvist this year and as he's signed for next year there is no rush.
\
Sorry about putting it in the wrong section, would a 3rd rounder be enough to acquire him? Considering 3rd rounders are quite hit and miss I would have no issue going after him.
The goalie I would really like to get though is Martin Jones. One interesting thing about Martin Jones is that he is 12 for 12 in shootouts which is best in the NHL and would be enough for me to part with a 3rd rounder if that is all LA would want. I am sure after dealing Scrivens for a 3rd rounder, they are not willing to part with Jones unless Winnipeg overpays.
LOL, yeah it would take way more than a 3rd to get Jones out of LA. Jones is younger, signed for next season, RFA after that, played better, more potential than Scrivens. LA traded Scrivens since they have confidence in Jones and Scrivens was set to be UFA in the off-season (and no room with Jones pushing him, playing better). Jones will be in LA for another 2-3 years, much like Bernier did.
IF the above package (Ladd for Toffoli, Jones) you'd just have to include Montoya in the deal. Doubt LA does that though, Toffoli and Jones are cost controlled for so much time they couldn't afford to give those guys up, IMO.