HandshakeLine
A real jerk thing
Guilty on two counts of being Euro in a Sullivan zone
Sorry to be the annoying stat guy, but like I've written Puljujarvi's points/60 is the 3rd best of the team and more than twice as much as what e.g. Acciari, Poulin or DOC have. He is -2 (among the best of the team), while e.g. Acciari is -9 and DOC -14, so is he really the worst forward in the team?
They are acting like bureucrats, bigger salary means better player in their eyes.Sorry to be the annoying stat guy, but like I've written Puljujarvi's points/60 is the 3rd best of the team and more than twice as much as what e.g. Acciari, Poulin or DOC have. He is -2 (among the best of the team), while e.g. Acciari is -9 and DOC -14, so is he really the worst forward in the team?
Why are you showing up to this disaster with a bag full of logic?Sorry to be the annoying stat guy, but like I've written Puljujarvi's points/60 is the 3rd best of the team and more than twice as much as what e.g. Acciari, Poulin or DOC have. He is -2 (among the best of the team), while e.g. Acciari is -9 and DOC -14, so is he really the worst forward in the team?
I am no fan of hockey metrics at all (I think they're mostly snake oil and people are rubes for buying into the sabermetricization of hockey), but I find it hilarious that Dubas marketed himself as this big analytical guy, we revamped the analytics department twice in the last 5 or so years, and yet, we just keep a coach who ignores any sort of data behind the bench as some sort of living hockey god.Sorry to be the annoying stat guy, but like I've written Puljujarvi's points/60 is the 3rd best of the team and more than twice as much as what e.g. Acciari, Poulin or DOC have. He is -2 (among the best of the team), while e.g. Acciari is -9 and DOC -14, so is he really the worst forward in the team?