Brutal take, Danault dominated Mathews who had scored 12 goals in 25 playoff games which is almost a 40 goal pace despite almost exclusively being matched up against the greatest shutdown center of this generation in Patrice Bergeron for most of those games. He had also scored 7 goals in his last 12 playoff games prior to Danault shutting him down.
Then you arbitrarily assert that McDavid's points were all 5 on 5 and specifically against Danault.
Danault is an elite shut down center.......only those with the most blinding anti-Danault bias would argue otherwise. If you want to debate his offensive effectiveness then he is fair game but otherwise it is just a poorly orchestrated witch hunt.
No. No, it isn't.
He would be well advised to let people that he hired to do their job. Or, if he doesn't trust them, to replace them with someone he trusts.
I'm sure KK really cares.
I understand the coach's perspective. It's in his best interest to have the strongest possible lineup on the ice. However, when it comes to choosing a development path of an 18 years old 3rd overall pick the ultimate decision lies with the GM and his development staff. It's his responsibility to consider the long term effects on a player and the team as a whole.I doubt it's Bergevin himself who decides if the guy is staying or not.
It was probably Julien's call that had the most weight at the end of the day.
Sure but I find this discussion disingenuous, to be honest.I understand the coach's perspective. It's in his best interest to have the strongest possible lineup on the ice. However, when it comes to choosing a development path of an 18 years old 3rd overall pick the ultimate decision lies with the GM and his development staff. It's his responsibility to consider the long term effects on a player and the team as a whole.
I understand the coach's perspective. It's in his best interest to have the strongest possible lineup on the ice. However, when it comes to choosing a development path of an 18 years old 3rd overall pick the ultimate decision lies with the GM and his development staff. It's his responsibility to consider the long term effects on a player and the team as a whole.
Players improved!Agreed and it's also the GMs job to get the coach to buy into his vision. So if the GM wants to take a long term approach he needs to make sure the coach isn't being judged by his win/loss record but by how much players are improving.
Players improved!
KK is the only one who regressed!
Maybe just maybe! I know it sounds crazy but maybe it's the player himself?
Gally, Petry, PK, Patioready, Byron, Tatar...How many players improved while playing for Julien or Therrien for that matter? Danault, Suzuki, anyone else?
Except he’s sucked on the wing when he’s played there.KK will do well in Carolina because he will play on a wing instead of center and he will play with better players. I am pretty sure he will get 50 points and more this year.
He bombed his last two years and to hear it from Ramage, it was on KK not listening and doing what coaches asked him to do. That’s on the player, not the team.Sure but I find this discussion disingenuous, to be honest.
KK put up 34 points playing with Lehkonen and Armia in his rookie year!
He looked perfectly fine, after his first year no one really doubted that the decision to keep him with the big club was the right choice!
Now, all we hear is how they screwed him... Give me a break.
The team could've probably tried something else, another approach, but I mean it's the NHL it's not kindergarten...He bombed his last two years and to hear it from Ramage, it was on KK not listening and doing what coaches asked him to do. That’s on the player, not the team.
Except he’s sucked on the wing when he’s played there.
Gally, Petry, PK, Patioready, Byron, Tatar...
I mean... let's see your list of players that regressed?
Galchenyuk and KK?
Forgot about Scherbak...
Ok man, I have no idea what exactly would satisfy you as proper development.I disagree with pretty much that entire list, but regardless you actually highlighted the point by only listing 1 guy who came in as a prospect/rookie. If you were a prospect under MB you had to be exceptional to have a chance to develop. And even then that development is to go from 52 point player to a 55-60 point player who is better defensively then they were as a rookie.
Yes. Even considering the mandate from the owner to ice a competitive team after the disastrous 2017-18 season, Kotkaniemi was hardly a gamebraker. We were all excited, because he was 18, but I imagine that if Plekanec stayed for one more year, we wouldn't really see the difference in terms of effectiveness.Agreed and it's also the GMs job to get the coach to buy into his vision. So if the GM wants to take a long term approach he needs to make sure the coach isn't being judged by his win/loss record but by how much players are improving.
That's the spirit!Just want him to crash and burn hard in Carolina and put them in an awkward spot of now having to keep him long term or lose him for nothing.
Can’t remember the last time I wanted an ex Hab to fail as bad as I do him. Fu*k KK.
It also puts a little flavour on the "Its not beregevin, it timmins/coach/whoever" I think he personally interferes a lot more than many think. The only case that might not be true was with Therrien. But they had the same lousy foxhole mentality so it doesn't matter when they both would make the same terrible choices.Wow, that's not exactly an endorsement of Bergevin.
MB is da man! This is his team!It also puts a little flavour on the "Its not beregevin, it timmins/coach/whoever" I think he personally interferes a lot more than many think. The only case that might not be true was with Therrien. But they had the same lousy foxhole mentality so it doesn't matter when they both would make the same terrible choices.
I feel like going to Carolina will hurt KKs development. He was given sheltered minutes in Montreal and may not get the same in Carolina. Further, I did not think he looked that good on wing. The best thing for KK would be to spend a half season or more in the AHL as a 1C to work on his game and then come up and be a 2C. With his $6M pay day, KK is expected to be a star and he is not their yet.