Confirmed with Link: Jeff Petry (50% retained) traded to DET for Gustav Lindström and conditional 4th-round pick in 2025 (later of Detroit or Boston's pick)

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,868
23,548
Nova Scotia
Visit site
I suggest that your invective is better aimed at the fool who signed Hoffman to that outrageous contract rather than the player who benefited from that foolishness. Hoffman was the player he was before he came here. To have expected more is one of the reasons why Hughes is now the General Manager.
It's not easy moving on from The Rinse and Repeat Era.....
/slowly but surely, we are going in the right direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh

CHfan1

Registered User
Apr 23, 2012
8,123
9,476
Random thought considering this thread and sorry to use you as a springboard. I wonder how many times in nhl history a team with a 50 goal scorer finished bottom 5?

Having a quick look at the salary cap era. Kovalchuk scored 52 in the 2007-08 season and Atlanta finished 3rd last. Ovechkin scored 52 in the 2005-06 season and Washington finished 4th last.
 

the

Registered User
Mar 2, 2012
14,129
19,797
Montreal
Random thought considering this thread and sorry to use you as a springboard. I wonder how many times in nhl history a team with a 50 goal scorer finished bottom 5?
Without looking, I got to believe my boy Ilya Kovalchuk got screwed a few times.

That guy's talent was wasted in Atlanta.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Andy

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,813
58,909
Citizen of the world
Random thought considering this thread and sorry to use you as a springboard. I wonder how many times in nhl history a team with a 50 goal scorer finished bottom 5?
That should be the list:

Kovalchuks thrashers in 07-08 (3)
Ovis caps in 05 06 (25th)
Bures Panthers from 00-01 (4th)
Bures nucks in 97 98 (3)
Selannes Ducks in 97-98 (4)
Stevie Ys Wings finished 3rd last in 89 90
Jimmy Carson in 87 88 (4)
Cicarellis north star in 86 87
Rick Vaive in 81 82 (3) and 83-84 (4)
Mike Bullards and his pens in 83-84 leading the charge to draft the GOAT (last)
Blaine Stoughton and the Whalers in 81 82 (4)
Dennis Maruk and Caps in 80 81 (5th)
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,856
7,462
Yup.

Some people might see it as players might think "Look at the habs, they did Petry a favor, sounds like nice place to play."

But there's other side which is "Damn, Petry REALLY does not want to play in Montreal. I thought it was a covid restriction thing, guess not."

There are always other considerations and I don't think the gesture we did for Petry is as well perceived as people think.
Yeah but did Hughes want him to play here?
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,625
50,029
That should be the list:

Kovalchuks thrashers in 07-08 (3)
Ovis caps in 05 06 (25th)
Bures Panthers from 00-01 (4th)
Bures nucks in 97 98 (3)
Selannes Ducks in 97-98 (4)
Stevie Ys Wings finished 3rd last in 89 90
Jimmy Carson in 87 88 (4)
Cicarellis north star in 86 87
Rick Vaive in 81 82 (3) and 83-84 (4)
Mike Bullards and his pens in 83-84 leading the charge to draft the GOAT (last)
Blaine Stoughton and the Whalers in 81 82 (4)
Dennis Maruk and Caps in 80 81 (5th)
Rick Nash comes to mind. Luc Robitaille? Just trying to think of bad teams and big scorers. Joe Sakic?
 

sheed36

Registered User
Jan 8, 2005
47,684
36,378
No Man's Land
Just finished reading a Petry piece in the Detroit Free Press from today.


"When the GM of Montreal called me and told me I was traded to Detroit, it was a big relief, and also a lot of excitement," Petry said.

Really Jeff? The guy just did you a huge favor and accommodated you and your family by trading you to where you wanted to go (maybe even for a lesser return that he may have gotten later elsewhere) and you couldn't even call him by his name Jeff b'y.

Also was it a big relief Jeff like when you need to take a crap very badly and there's no bathroom close by but you finally make it to one at the very last second right before crapping your pants? Was it a big relief like that Jeff? :sarcasm:

GM.jpg


To hear that news that you're coming home and coming to play for the team you watched growing up, to be able to put on this jersey, that means a lot," Petry said. "Detroit was the No. 1 spot on my list. I want to play here, and I've wanted to my whole life.

And yet you re-signed for 6 years with the Habs the first time you were gonna become a UFA and then another 4 year extension after.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
42,612
39,836
Montreal
it's very telling how completely out to lunch a lot of fans are.
I suppose you are the genius on this board? The poll had most of us saying he was being traded or at least Hughes was trying to trade him. I'm not going to fault fans for trying to determine how he would fit in if we had to use him. I'm also not going to fault fans who understood we coud only get his full value by playing him. Petry is still better than most if not all of our right side Einstein.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,835
12,678
While Hughes has proven to be a quantum improvement over his very limited predecessor, it doesn’t mean I agree with everything he has done. For example, I wouldn’t have drafted Reinbacher at 5OA. My preference was Leonard or to have traded down and selected Moore. But his acquisition of Newhook and his passing on Wright were excellent moves. Likewise, his initial re- acquisition of Petry was a Machiavellian-like move. On its surface, the recent trading of Petry was, at best, curious. I can’t see the huge risk we would have assumed in retaining Petry and trading him at the next trade deadline. If he got injured or his play materially regressed, what would we have lost? A 4th round pick in 2025? A marginal prospect? But if his play even approached 75% of prime Petry, he would have served as a great bridge player until our other prospects arrived and been a valuable trading asset. But that calculus is based on a superficial review of this recent transaction. None of us know what went on behind close doors. I will give Hughes the benefit of the doubt for no other reason than in the end he was able to rid us Hoffman’s contract, retain little on Petry’s contract and secure second and fourth round picks.
 
Last edited:

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,541
11,952
While Hughes has proven to be a quantum improvement over his very limited predecessor, it doesn’t mean I agree with everything he has done. For example, I wouldn’t have drafted Reinbacher at 5OA. My preference was Leonard or to have traded down and selected Moore. But his acquisition of Newhook and his passing on Wright were excellent moves. Likewise, his initial re- acquisition of Petry was a Machiavellian-like move. On its surface, the recent trading of Petry was, at best, curious. I can’t see the huge risk we would have assumed in retaining Petry and trading him at the next trade deadline. If he got injured or his play materially regressed, what would we have lost? A 4th round pick in 2025? A marginal prospect? But if his play even approached 75% of prime Petry, he would have served as a great bridge player until our other prospects arrived and been a valuable trading asset. But that calculus is based on a superficial review of this recent transaction. None of knows what went on behind close doors. I will give Hughes the benefit of the doubt for no other reason than he was able to get rid of the Hoffman contract, retained little on Petry and secured a second round pick in the end.
Unless he would get the Habs a 1st round pick he wasn't worth keeping. Matheson, Savard, Harris, Barron, Guhle and Xhekaj should be playing. Petry would just impede the progress of one of the young players. And Petry dodn't want to return to the Habs and his comments on the trade make him an undesirable. He should have thanked Hughes for getting him to Detroit. And as was already said his comment about always wanting to play for the Wings is bullshit.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad