While Hughes has proven to be a quantum improvement over his very limited predecessor, it doesn’t mean I agree with everything he has done. For example, I wouldn’t have drafted Reinbacher at 5OA. My preference was Leonard or to have traded down and selected Moore. But his acquisition of Newhook and his passing on Wright were excellent moves. Likewise, his initial re- acquisition of Petry was a Machiavellian-like move. On its surface, the recent trading of Petry was, at best, curious. I can’t see the huge risk we would have assumed in retaining Petry and trading him at the next trade deadline. If he got injured or his play materially regressed, what would we have lost? A 4th round pick in 2025? A marginal prospect? But if his play even approached 75% of prime Petry, he would have served as a great bridge player until our other prospects arrived and been a valuable trading asset. But that calculus is based on a superficial review of this recent transaction. None of us know what went on behind close doors. I will give Hughes the benefit of the doubt for no other reason than in the end he was able to rid us Hoffman’s contract, retain little on Petry’s contract and secure second and fourth round picks.