Trxjw
Retired.
I mean TDA is one of the best offensive d-men in the league. If a team does pick him up, they’ll get a massive upgrade. He isn’t some random scrub.
Well worth the risk of him potentially choking a teammate in 3 months.
I mean TDA is one of the best offensive d-men in the league. If a team does pick him up, they’ll get a massive upgrade. He isn’t some random scrub.
This is a real stretch. It's clear there wasn't really a market for TDA. Otherwise he would have been dealt already. Otherwise he would have been claimed for free.
This move was made not because it was time to move on, but because it was determined to be that it would be addition by subtraction. So, in that case, the FO determined there's value in waiving him.That is 100% not the case. This was not a "we don't have a market" scenario...this was a force into a corner created by yourself scenario. By the time he was on waivers his value was annihilated. Never had to be that way.
And that's the point right. Its not about Deangelo necessarily, or even whether "we'll be better off". The GMs responsibility is maximizing the talent that you have control over contractually...not destroying value under the guise of team morale. You can have both with a less rigid decision process.
Someone else wrote "time to move on" and we have to. What's happened has happened.
you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?Well worth the risk of him potentially choking a teammate in 3 months.
If Reggie was hitting .210 and not hitting HRs, you can bet your ass that would have been looked at differently. TDA's play/production didn't warrant putting up with him.
Bill Parcells was very honest: there was a different standard for Lawrence Taylor than there would have been for the backup long-snapper.
It can be both that he might be missed and they might be better off without him...TDA put up over 50 points last year did he not ? and the PP was pretty good was it not ?
last nights PP looked like a disaster, yes they scored 1 goal but TDA will be missed in the long run
You're really benefitting from seeing how things played out when looking how a decision was made in the past.you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?
if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.
TDA put up over 50 points last year did he not ? and the PP was pretty good was it not ?
last nights PP looked like a disaster, yes they scored 1 goal but TDA will be missed in the long run
you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?
if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.
the entire setup is bad.The PP isnt a disaster because Tony wasnt on the point. It's a disaster because Quinn and his staff refuse to put a LH shot on the RW so there is threat to shoot on both sides.
Instead we have PP1 that must force feed the puck left to shoot and PP2 that forces the puck right to shoot.
Are you suggesting that things changed from the deadline and to offseason? Crazy stuff....
Also, not sure that the Bronx Zoo locker room is what you want for the youngest team in the league.If Reggie was hitting .210 and not hitting HRs, you can bet your ass that would have been looked at differently. TDA's play/production didn't warrant putting up with him.
Bill Parcells was very honest: there was a different standard for Lawrence Taylor than there would have been for the backup long-snapper.
Of course, but the baggage is something each team will weigh. There is a reason that no team simply claimed him.I mean TDA is one of the best offensive d-men in the league. If a team does pick him up, they’ll get a massive upgrade. He isn’t some random scrub.
Hockeys different hereThe GM shows integrity and holds himself true to his word about dealing with Tony's antics and people are upset that he sunk the value of an asset he'd been shopping for months with only moderate interest to begin with. Sounds about right.
So you're saying that Gorton intentionally sabotaged the team and gave TDA a contract with the knowledge that TDA would become an issue that was untenable? That's a gift that's really wasted on a hockey board.tell me about Gordon’s comments after being swept. Tell me about the cap. Crazy if you forgot
Going to go with fistfights in the locker room are exceptions and not the rule.you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?
if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.
Evergreen post.Hockeys different here
Don't make fun of Marty. he was just greatly misunderstood.Bet you would have nailed the Marty McSorely trade. Now.
in addition why even state "tony has played his last game as a Ranger"
That statement alone has now handcuffed you into making a bad trade because you lost all leverage with your other GM's
really baffling what has happened here ...we lose a quality d-man and get nothing back...great job gorton
you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?
if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.
So you're saying that Gorton intentionally sabotaged the team and gave TDA a contract with the knowledge that TDA would become an issue that was untenable? That's a gift that's really wasted on a hockey board.
He was spoken to by the front office, the coaching staff and his own teammates. But yeah, all about a simply flare up of tempers.This whole thing was about a lot more than just the fight. Players don't get last warnings for nothing.
It balances out the likes of you.thank goodness we have you.
Wasn’t Buch on PP1 the last few games?The PP isnt a disaster because Tony wasnt on the point. It's a disaster because Quinn and his staff refuse to put a LH shot on the RW so there is threat to shoot on both sides.
Instead we have PP1 that must force feed the puck left to shoot and PP2 that forces the puck right to shoot.
It balances out the likes of you.