Player Discussion Jeff Gorton Part II

Priorae

Registered User
Apr 21, 2017
912
1,197
New Jersey
This is a real stretch. It's clear there wasn't really a market for TDA. Otherwise he would have been dealt already. Otherwise he would have been claimed for free.

That is 100% not the case. This was not a "we don't have a market" scenario...this was a force into a corner created by yourself scenario. By the time he was on waivers his value was annihilated. Never had to be that way.

And that's the point right. Its not about Deangelo necessarily, or even whether "we'll be better off". The GMs responsibility is maximizing the talent that you have control over contractually...not destroying value under the guise of team morale. You can have both with a less rigid decision process.

Someone else wrote "time to move on" and we have to. What's happened has happened.
 
Feb 27, 2002
37,943
8,028
NYC
That is 100% not the case. This was not a "we don't have a market" scenario...this was a force into a corner created by yourself scenario. By the time he was on waivers his value was annihilated. Never had to be that way.

And that's the point right. Its not about Deangelo necessarily, or even whether "we'll be better off". The GMs responsibility is maximizing the talent that you have control over contractually...not destroying value under the guise of team morale. You can have both with a less rigid decision process.

Someone else wrote "time to move on" and we have to. What's happened has happened.
This move was made not because it was time to move on, but because it was determined to be that it would be addition by subtraction. So, in that case, the FO determined there's value in waiving him.

Again, if there's a market for him (created or otherwise) he would have been dealt already.
 

MysticLeviathan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 7, 2013
19,349
11,985
Well worth the risk of him potentially choking a teammate in 3 months.
you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?

if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.
 

tailgunner

Registered User
Jan 8, 2008
1,302
577
If Reggie was hitting .210 and not hitting HRs, you can bet your ass that would have been looked at differently. TDA's play/production didn't warrant putting up with him.

Bill Parcells was very honest: there was a different standard for Lawrence Taylor than there would have been for the backup long-snapper.

TDA put up over 50 points last year did he not ? and the PP was pretty good was it not ?
last nights PP looked like a disaster, yes they scored 1 goal but TDA will be missed in the long run
 
Feb 27, 2002
37,943
8,028
NYC
you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?

if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.
You're really benefitting from seeing how things played out when looking how a decision was made in the past.

Bet you would have nailed the Marty McSorely trade. Now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trxjw

WojtekWolski86

Registered User
Nov 14, 2019
2,729
4,424
TDA put up over 50 points last year did he not ? and the PP was pretty good was it not ?
last nights PP looked like a disaster, yes they scored 1 goal but TDA will be missed in the long run

The PP isnt a disaster because Tony wasnt on the point. It's a disaster because Quinn and his staff refuse to put a LH shot on the RW so there is threat to shoot on both sides.

Instead we have PP1 that must force feed the puck left to shoot and PP2 that forces the puck right to shoot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duhmetreE

Trxjw

Retired.
May 8, 2007
28,334
11,205
Land of no calls..
you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?

if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.

Fight? Of course. Try to choke a teammate? No, that's not normal.

So do you want Gorton to just take the first offer on any player he intends to trade or do you want him to try and negotiate the best value he can? Because you sure as hell can't have it both ways.
 

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,466
52,315
The PP isnt a disaster because Tony wasnt on the point. It's a disaster because Quinn and his staff refuse to put a LH shot on the RW so there is threat to shoot on both sides.

Instead we have PP1 that must force feed the puck left to shoot and PP2 that forces the puck right to shoot.
the entire setup is bad.

Setup a LHS on the right dot
Setup a RHS on the left dot
Set up a bumper in high slot
Have Kreider in front
Let Fox run point

I do not get why its so hard. Puck control is not the main goal on a PP... it's seems that's what we're going for sometimes
 

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
If Reggie was hitting .210 and not hitting HRs, you can bet your ass that would have been looked at differently. TDA's play/production didn't warrant putting up with him.

Bill Parcells was very honest: there was a different standard for Lawrence Taylor than there would have been for the backup long-snapper.
Also, not sure that the Bronx Zoo locker room is what you want for the youngest team in the league.
 
Feb 27, 2002
37,943
8,028
NYC
tell me about Gordon’s comments after being swept. Tell me about the cap. Crazy if you forgot
So you're saying that Gorton intentionally sabotaged the team and gave TDA a contract with the knowledge that TDA would become an issue that was untenable? That's a gift that's really wasted on a hockey board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
you really don’t think teammates fight with each other?

if you’re gonna trade him then trade him, don’t resign him. just horrific asset management.
Going to go with fistfights in the locker room are exceptions and not the rule.

As far as asset valuation goes, management made a decision that for the value of the overall company, a business unit must be eliminated. The action of subtracting an asset for seemingly nothing has the effect of raising long term value on the overall company.
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,296
21,181
in addition why even state "tony has played his last game as a Ranger"

That statement alone has now handcuffed you into making a bad trade because you lost all leverage with your other GM's
really baffling what has happened here ...we lose a quality d-man and get nothing back...great job gorton

No it hasn't, because Tony won't be traded. No GM is going to take him, and if they did, they wouldn't do it without sending bad cap back.

Tony will sit at home and watch the Rangers play until the next buyout window opens up, then he will be gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shesterkybomb

haveandare

Registered User
Jul 2, 2009
19,000
7,622
New York
The PP isnt a disaster because Tony wasnt on the point. It's a disaster because Quinn and his staff refuse to put a LH shot on the RW so there is threat to shoot on both sides.

Instead we have PP1 that must force feed the puck left to shoot and PP2 that forces the puck right to shoot.
Wasn’t Buch on PP1 the last few games?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad