TheNumber4
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2011
- 48,678
- 60,536
This has been beaten to death already but the high danger scoring chances off the rush was a major part (not the only part) of why the Oilers were losing early on. The team just wasnt executing a defensive system with any regularity. Assignments were confused and all too often players made agregious coverage mistakes and left the opposing player wide open. If the HDSC stats were more granular that would have been more evident. You had to actually watch the games.
The bottom line...it is virtually unsustainable for a team to to be somehwat competitive when the defensive execution in front of the goalie is subpar, The goalie doesnt know what to expect (in terms of coverage) in any given situation and that alone is going to cause issues...especially for a young inexperienced technically strong goalie. There is no way for a goalie to play a calm efficient game in that environment. An experienced goalie that relys primarily on athletic saves would probably do better but the down side is that a goalie like that is not ususally as fundementally sound. Thats likely why most if not all goalies now a days have sound positioning and efficient movement as the foundation of their game. Grant Fuhr/Dominik Hasek type goalies are a thing of the past.
So its not a coincidence that as soon as the systems play was cleaned up the goaltending slowly started getting better.
On a side note...I really like the defensive system that Knoblauch has employed.
Gap control against the rush is much better and dmen are less likely to give up prime scoring areas and essentially back into Skinner. They are much better at taking away the cross ice passes and also at collapsing in the slot area when the puck is in tight. The back pressure is much better as well so the forwards are more involved in playing defence.
Gone are the moments where a dman is expected to make decisions on man to man or zone coverage and end up taking themsleves out of the play. That was a weak point in Nurses game for sure (and most of the dmen) although Ekholm seemed to handle it okay. Nurse is a much better dman and this defence as a whole is better when the system is simplified.
The last part of all this was that team just wasnt scoring enough (they werent outscoring their mistakes) early this season under Woody to compensate for their poor defensive play and the losses mounted up. Coffeys ability to change the transition game is also an important factor.
Not only is the team defending better and more efficiently the transitiom game is much better as well. More flow creates more goals off the rush and more time in the O zone.
I think that Woodys downfall was a result of 2 things....Woodys inability to communicate and prepare the team properly for the systems change and the lack of goal scoring.
IMO the lack of goal scoring was helped along by the lack of flow in their offensive game created by the defensive system confusion initiated from the changes. It was a fire drill in their own zone most of the time and their transition game was very poor. They opposing team dictated the play and the Oilers seldom had the appropriate response. Everything was disconnected.
That affected their offensive execution in a big way.
So while i think that Woody is a good coach I also think that his lack of experience played a role in why the team started the way it did.
I agree with this assessment. The defensive breakdowns both small and large at the beginning of the season cratered any chance of having good goaltending. When guys are coming in on 2 on 1 and making clean cross crease passes, like it’s a tall ask for a goaltender to consistently save those. Or when a guy slips behind our D and is left all alone with time and space to pick his spot, high chance goalies get sniped in that situation, see it all the time. I would say those were the big breakdown issues. For smaller breakdown issues stuff like screening your goalie and not letting him get clean looks. That has also been cleaned up a lot under Knob/Coffey.
Furthermore, On Knob versus Woody, go back and watch the goals Vegas scored against us in the playoffs and compare to what we are doing today. Notice how sparse our net front coverage was on a lot of goals against. The slot was barren a lot of times. And compare to now, with D-men always clogging net front and being in the right positions to clear rebounds and get in the most dangerous passing lanes. It’s night and day. A lot of this has to do with man on man that would have our D-men chasing forwards all the way to the blue line only for that forward to pass to their D-man for a point shot on net and a now vacated slot zone area. With the zone system, our D-men have limits to how far they can stray from the slot, there’s always coverage in the most dangerous areas in the slot.