I think that's a bit of revisionist history. When we hired Housley, he was an up-and-coming head coach. A can't miss guy. We were roundly applauded for getting him.
Whoops
The Sabres need to fix this and it starts with the Pegulas hiring someone with a proven track record of success with multiple teams and let them do whatever it is they feel they need to do.
I think it is the only way and it will have to be a big stake.I don't believe anyone fitting that description would want or need to work for the Pegulas. They might be able to attract such a person by offering an ownership stake.
Both of those points are false
3 years into his tenure and I still do not know what the plan is. Are we going to try to build a fast skilled team? A heavier physical one? A more defensive oriented team? A more offensive one?
His more recent moves seem to be all over the place with no sense of direction. What is the plan Jason? And WHY are there still 7 dman on the active roster? And for the love of god why is your stud 19 year old dman not being coached to be as aggressive and creative offensively as possible? Especially when the team is desperate for offense.
These are mistakes that occur when you throw a rookie GM into a role that he wasn't ready for with zero help from experienced people in this business. Toronto understands how to construct an upper management by having multiple people with serious experience and credibility around the league. Terry Pegulas solution was to have a first time GM shoulder the responsibilities of it all.
Both of those points are false
I would say he was trying to build a finesse skilled team. A team that relies heavily on skating and puck skills, where gaps on the ice are attacked. Where stick checks and quick transition is the name of the game instead of body positioning and consistent puck possession.
Few forward acquisitions in his tenure are good skaters. His teams are slow afoot, slow mentality and were saddled with a poor scheme under an incompetent coach the first two seasons he ran the team. His talent evaluation is terrible.
don’t get me wrong, he’s failed at doing that without a doubt. I’m just trying to figure who his guys are and go off that.
his team is pretty bare of any heavy grinders. His team is very European-like, based on his drafting and who he seems to listen to more often in his scouts. His team doesn’t have many defensive capable guys, but does have a focus on quick puck transition players.
the team is very soft, and I would doubt he targets any guys at the forward position that can grind it on defense.
I don't ever remember him being a can't miss guy.
The word we need in that is created. Botterill CREATED a last place team with cap problems.
I'd say the Sobotka, hunwick, sheary, vesey and the berglund contract that he lucked out off are just as bad.This is a bit black and white. The worst contracts are Murrays, the most expensive are Botterills. Eichel and Skinner are Botterill, Okposo and Bogo (among others) are Murray.
I'd say the Sobotka, hunwick, sheary, vesey and the berglund contract that he lucked out off are just as bad.
No worries: when we finish 8th we'll lose the lottery and end up picking 11th.We aren’t supposed to bash the team at all in the draft sticky. So I guess I’ll just put this here.
If we draft 8th overall I might snap. No telling what I’ll do to be honest.
He was applauded as a reason the Pred had that crazy cup run. He was seen as a bit of a risk as he hadn't been a head coach, but he had promise. It wasn't an idiotic hire.