Jacob582
Registered User
- Oct 16, 2012
- 10,202
- 3,810
Plus Laaksonen and MacInnis (iirc).Only one player hasn't played on a day they've been on the taxi squad and that was Fitz in the last game.
Plus Laaksonen and MacInnis (iirc).Only one player hasn't played on a day they've been on the taxi squad and that was Fitz in the last game.
I can’t find a practical reason to do this so there must be something about taxi squads that I don’t fully understand. You can use a taxi squad emergency call up to avoid waivers, but it doesn’t make sense for a player that is t waivers eligibleFor what ever reason, that has been how the team has been calling up injury replacements. They assign them to the taxi squad, and then add them to the main roster before the game.
Plus Laaksonen and MacInnis (iirc).
Looks like he'll be playing -
Hopping right into PP1.
Pretty excited about having him, Krebs, and Samuelsson up at the same times. Just need Peterka to come back and be healthy.
It's simple the taxi squad move doesn't count against call ups so utilize itFor what ever reason, that has been how the team has been calling up injury replacements. They assign them to the taxi squad, and then add them to the main roster before the game.
Once the trade deal line comes and goes they all might have stay up for the remainder of the seasonPretty excited about having him, Krebs, and Samuelsson up at the same times. Just need Peterka to come back and be healthy.
He woulda coulda shoulda scored in his debut so I'll be looking for a goal tonight. He'll be tough to send back downAudition #2, wonder if they burn the year ?
What Line ?
He woulda coulda shoulda scored in his debut so I'll be looking for a goal tonight. He'll be tough to send back down
Perfetti | 17GP | 6G | 9A | 15pts |
Quinn | 23GP | 16G | 18A | 34pts |
Interesting that Perfetti comes out ahead in Pronman's Game Score model because Quinn has only a 49 percent goal rate and 45 percent Corsi. Perfetti only has six goals in seventeen games but rates 63 and 65 percent, respectively, for goal rate and Corsi.
Does this mean he could use some more time in Roch?[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Perfetti 17GP 6G 9A 15pts Quinn 23GP 16G 18A 34pts
Before I get accused of being anti-Quinn, I’m not, but can you please give me an example of great goal scorer whose possession numbers are bad? I was also curious about those numbers because in my 2 Quinn viewings he dominated possession (eye test), so the neg rel CF was surprising.No. Guys who are good at scoring actual (rather than theoretical) goals always break those kind of models.
Before I get accused of being anti-Quinn, I’m not, but can you please give me an example of great goal scorer whose possession numbers are bad? I was also curious about those numbers because in my 2 Quinn viewings he dominated possession (eye test), so the neg rel CF was surprising.
Before I get accused of being anti-Quinn, I’m not, but can you please give me an example of great goal scorer whose possession numbers are bad? I was also curious about those numbers because in my 2 Quinn viewings he dominated possession (eye test), so the neg rel CF was surprising.
Ovi’s possession numbers are off the charts good. Laine and Olofsson’s goal numbers haven’t sustained, so I’m not sure they are great examples. Stamkos has crazy possession numbers. Who else is a legit great goal scorer? Kane? His numbers are good. Every single player I can think have that is a legit top tier goal scorer has good possession numbers. So, really I just want to hear what someone that watches most of not all America games. How could Quinn, who seems to me to be the best player on the ice, have poor possession numbers.Honestly, you could probably pick a name from a hat. Most guys who are great at scoring goals score more of them than metrics say they should. Ovi, Laine, even Olofsson (well, last year anyway--I'm sure the numbers this season look different with how injuries have neutralized his scoring ability).
DeBrincat, Kane, Laine, Raymond, Panarin, Kreider, Zib, Batherson, Tkachuk, Norris, Tarasenko, Barbashev are some of the ones i found with 44 - 48ish CF numbers this season, though they didn't all have negative rel CF some did and some were very close.Before I get accused of being anti-Quinn, I’m not, but can you please give me an example of great goal scorer whose possession numbers are bad? I was also curious about those numbers because in my 2 Quinn viewings he dominated possession (eye test), so the neg rel CF was surprising.
Are you just looking at this year? Because single season goal scoring numbers will fluctuate a lot more than corsi.DeBrincat, Kane, Laine, Raymond, Panarin, Kreider, Zib, Batherson, Tkachuk, Norris, Tarasenko, Barbashev are some of the ones i found with 44 - 48ish CF numbers this season, though they didn't all have negative rel CF some did and some were very close.
Just this year, I mean the Quinn numbers are also being judged by just this year in the AHL right? Kind of defeats the purpose of saying he's a bad possession player when comparing 23 AHL games of data to an entire career for another player. Generally good teams also have good possession numbers, and bad teams do not. A player like Ovechkin is not likely to have the same CF on the Sabres as he does on the Caps.Are you just looking at this year? Because single season goal scoring numbers will fluctuate a lot more than corsi.
Interesting that Perfetti comes out ahead in Pronman's Game Score model because Quinn has only a 49 percent goal rate and 45 percent Corsi. Perfetti only has six goals in seventeen games but rates 63 and 65 percent, respectively, for goal rate and Corsi.
Does this mean he could use some more time in Roch?[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Perfetti 17GP 6G 9A 15pts Quinn 23GP 16G 18A 34pts