I'm actually in the "please no Eiserman" camp but I need to defend his overall skill set. He is capable of puck handling and passing on par with Catton. The problem is, Catton diversifies his abilities, Eiserman just wants to, pardon my French, shoot the f**king puck all day.
But as a draft guy with conviction, I'm going to stick to my guns and say if we're going to put down Eiserman it must be for the right reasons. His offensive skill set is undeniably incredible. It's his play without the puck, his compete level, and often his decision making with the puck which makes him a bit of a hair-puller.
I also wanted to touch on Nygard real quick. He is certainly high floor. He barely has to develop at all to be a heck of a physical 3rd liner. He's so smart, competitive, physical and fast he's already almost there. It's just a question of how much he will score at the highest levels.
I give him more offensive upside than most, simply because I believe a higher percentage of NHL goals are scored from net front traffic -- rebounds, deflections, screens. That's Nygard's bread and butter. A guy like Boqvist creates more from the soft areas which disappear very quickly in the NHL. Nygard is the king of the greasy goal, and that's going to benefit him going forward.
Lastly, I just wanted to add that I really enjoyed your post and you raised some terrific points about all these talented prospects.