Prospect Info: Ives 2022 Top 100 NHL Draft Rankings (Spring Edition, 2.0)

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Here's your intermittent Logan-Morrison-Is-Freaking-Awesome update:

Morrison notched another assist today, bringing him up to 13 goals and 13 assists for 26 points in 13 games for a Hamilton Bulldogs team on the verge of making the OHL finals with an eye-popping 12-0 record.

Morrison is now 2nd in OHL playoff scoring to #1 Dallas prospect Wyatt Johnston, who now has 10 goals and 29 points, playing in his 16th game.

The 19 year old over-ager Morrison currently -- somehow -- finds himself in exactly two top 100 draft lists. Just two, that's it. Craig Button ranks him #86 overall, while I have him ranked at #39.

We are talking about a 6'0, right shot-center who skates well, plays two ways with a high compete level, combines high-end passing/puckhandling/shooting and features one of the highest hockey IQs in the entire 2022 class.

Wake up, hockey writers. You're sleeping on a gem.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
In WHL news, tonight Edmonton finished off Winnipeg in the semi-final, taking the series 4 games to 1.

This means it's the last we will see of 1st round draft certainties C Matt Savoie and C Connor Geekie, as well as one of the best sleepers in the draft in over-aged LW Mikey Milne.

Geekie was unimpressive in the payoffs. Sure, he was ok, but 11 points in 15 games with so-so two-way play does not cut it in my book for a player who entered the draft campaign in the consensus top 5 overall. After scoring 70 points in 64 games during the regular season, Geekie's oft-floating compete levels fell behind in the greater intensity of the post-season. I still think some team takes him in the top 10 because he's an enormously talented kid, and a 6'4 center who skates well, but to be honest I'm not sure if Geekie stays in my final top 20 right now.

Matt Savoie played well in the playoffs, but not exceptionally. He had a 6-6-12 line in 10 games, which I attribute to the fact that his lack of size and elite skating causes him troubles against higher-level competition. To wit, his regular season numbers were 35-55-90 in 65 games. He may not have been 100% healthy in all of his playoff matches, however, and this must also be factored in. Savoie is an enormously skilled player with high-end offensive upside, and my final ranking will likely see him just outside the top 10.

Mikey Milne was Winnipeg's very best player in the playoffs. He's the team's best defensive forward and best forechecker, and in the post-season he also led the team in goals with 13 in 15 games. This is important to keep in mind because Milne does not play with Savoie, he is stapled to Geekie on the 2nd unit -- probably because Milne is the best defensive forward on the team and Geekie can be defensively lackadaisical. Milne has an elite intangibles in terms of compete/IQ, and he's a good skater. What really improved for him this year was his puck skills.

Mikey Milne is my #2 over-ager for the 2022 draft after only Logan Morrison. He should be available in the 4th/5th rounds, and I feel he has a very high floor as a bottom 6 guy. I'd say his upside is actually notable for this type of player, however -- like a Mangiapane, Milne is the type of guy who forechecks and defends like hell on your 3rd line but also might continue to develop the offensive productivity to move up to a 2nd line role. I really like this kid as a mid-round pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guadana and My3Sons

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
In OHL news, last night the Hamilton Bulldogs completed their four-game sweep (now have won all 12 playoff games) of the North Bay Battalion.

North Bay's exit -- after a very respectable and admirable playoff run -- ends the seasons of draft-eligibles LD Tnias Mathurin, RD Ty Nelson and C Liam Arnsby.

Mathurin is a 6'3-200, physical, bruising defensive defender. He was absolutely outstanding in series wins vs. Ottawa and Kingston, but his areas of needed improvement were exposed a bit against a ridiculously talented Hamilton squad. Though Mathurin escapes the stereotype of his player profile by being quite skilled with the puck, he's still an average skater and had difficulty with the high-speed and skill of the Bulldogs forwards. Still, this is a player who currently sits just outside my top 100 and is certainly worth a pick in the 4th round, it just probably won't be by the Devils who already have a similar-type LD in Michael Vukojevic.

Ty Nelson is Mathurin's polar opposite, an all-offense, no-defense undersized RD. He finished the playoffs with solid production of 0-10-10 in 13 games, but was absolutely exploited vs. Hamilton. The talented Bulldogs team basically saw him as a traffic cone out there and tried to get their top forwards out there every time Nelson was on the ice. Many consider Nelson a 1st round pick, and although I don't doubt this is a kid with the talent to score 40+ points from an NHL blueline, he's an adventure in scoring chances for both sides every time he's on the ice. I'd draft Nelson, but probably not until the the 4th round.

North Bay's best draft eligible player to me is Liam Arnsby, who is one of the best defensive centers in the 2022 draft. Though just 5'11-180, he plays an extremely physical game and is just a stud in his own zone. He'll never score much -- his playoff line was 0-6-6 in 13 games -- but he's a beast on the PK and in the face-off circle and makes life hell for the opposition. He's a high-IQ leader who skates very well. His lack of scoring has him extremely overlooked in the rankings, but he's a very high floor guy as an NHL bottom-line center and I'm absolutely looking at him from the 5th round on, especially with the Devils extreme need for bottom-6-type centers in the system.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
A reminder that tomorrow night is Game 6 in the OHL semi-finals between Flint and Windsor, as well as a Game 7 elimination game between Seattle and Kamloops in the WHL semis.

There will probably be feeds available on-line for those who aren't glued to their CHL TV packages like myself.

That Seattle v Kamloops game should be a barn-burner -- the whole series has been phenomenal.

The winners of both these games, however, will be huge underdogs for their league finals. Edmonton is an absolute powerhouse in the WHL, and Hamilton is 12-0 thus far in three playoff series in the OHL.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Here's an updated mini-mock for June:

1 MTL C Wright
2 NJ LW Slafkovsky
3 ARI C Cooley
4 SEA RD Jiricek
5 PHI RD Nemec
6 CBJ LW Gauthier
7 OTT C Geekie
8 DET C Kasper
9 BUF C Savoie
10 ANH RW Kemell
11 SJ C/RW Lambert
12 CLB C McGroarty
13 NYI RW Lekkerimaki
14 WPG RD Chesley
15 VAN LD Bichsel
16 BUF LW Yurov

I'm pretty confident in the top 3 picks. I have Seattle opting for Jiricek over Nemec, as they showed a preference for size/physicality in their initial draft year. My big risers are Kasper and Bichsel, who have gained a whole lot of helium in the past month. Kasper can easily go top 10, and Bichsel might have moved atop the LD rankings on several teams' draft boards.
 

Rusty7550

Registered User
Aug 11, 2018
575
994
Here's an updated mini-mock for June:

1 MTL C Wright
2 NJ LW Slafkovsky
3 ARI C Cooley
4 SEA RD Jiricek
5 PHI RD Nemec
6 CBJ LW Gauthier
7 OTT C Geekie
8 DET C Kasper
9 BUF C Savoie
10 ANH RW Kemell
11 SJ C/RW Lambert
12 CLB C McGroarty
13 NYI RW Lekkerimaki
14 WPG RD Chesley
15 VAN LD Bichsel
16 BUF LW Yurov

I'm pretty confident in the top 3 picks. I have Seattle opting for Jiricek over Nemec, as they showed a preference for size/physicality in their initial draft year. My big risers are Kasper and Bichsel, who have gained a whole lot of helium in the past month. Kasper can easily go top 10, and Bichsel might have moved atop the LD rankings on several teams' draft boards.
Nemec will end up in Seattle 100%. They just signed his close friend and teammate from HK Nitra Samuel Bucek and there are rumors that they wanna sign another Slovak - Pavol Regenda (Slafs linemate)- Its seems like they wanna create a "home environment" for Nemec.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Nemec will end up in Seattle 100%. They just signed his close friend and teammate from HK Nitra Samuel Bucek and there are rumors that they wanna sign another Slovak - Pavol Regenda (Slafs linemate)- Its seems like they wanna create a "home environment" for Nemec.
They should trade next year's first for Tatar if they were smart.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
That would be Seider-esque surprise imo, so somewhat bold prediction. But Yzerman is known to "reach" or rather have unpopular rankings (that have paid off), so with all the swedish presence and history in the franchise my bet is they take Lekkerimäki or Öhgren.
Keep in mind Yzerman went directly against the numbers-oriented draft people with earlier-than-expected picks of both Moritz Seider and Lucas Raymond. Kasper would fit into the mold as a player with outstanding intangibles and tools who simply didn't put up numbers because of his role in a professional men's league in his draft-eligible campaign.

Kasper really held his own for Austria in the WC and his tools are not only tantalizing, but something Yzerman covets at a position of need for the Red Wings. Kasper is one of the best skaters in the draft; he's an outstanding two-way center and he plays an extremely physical game. His offensive skills are also underrated in my opinion -- the fact he's so defensively responsible and such a team guy certainly costs him on the scoresheets. Kasper is a very good puck handler and a superlative playmaker.

I think if you're looking for a center in the 2022 draft and Wright and Cooley are off the board, Kasper might offer a higher floor and represent a safer pick than Savoie, Geekie, Lambert and McGroarty -- while his upside also could be appreciably higher than most people realize. I'm very high on the round Austrian center, and I also have the utmost respect for Yzerman's ability to make these kinds of great and gutsy draft picks.
 

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
I really like Kasper too, but I can think of about 10 players that I like even more. I've mostly seen him ranked in the late 1st round, and considering his lack of production I'd be very, but positively, surprised if he went in the top10.
 

Monsieur Verdoux

Registered User
Dec 6, 2016
2,102
3,349
Finland
I really like Kasper too, but I can think of about 10 players that I like even more. I've mostly seen him ranked in the late 1st round, and considering his lack of production I'd be very, but positively, surprised if he went in the top10.
Pronman had him 8th in his mock draft. He mentioned:

"Some may be surprised to see Kasper’s name this high, but he’s trending in this range with some teams and a strong World Championships is only helping that argument."

In another mock draft Kasper was the 10th pick. Pronman wrote:

"Some scouts felt Marco Kasper went too high, whereas other scouts had no issue with his slotting."

It's likely that Kasper is closer to the 10th pick than the 20th pick in the draft.

 

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,328
6,813
To conclude, I'll make an "All-Underrated" team for the 2022 class:

C Owen Beck
C Logan Morrison
LW Jiri Kulich
RW Alexander Perevalov
W Adam Sykora
LD Arseni Koromyslov
LD Tomas Hamara
RD Noah Warren
RD Artyom Barabosha
G Ivan Zhigalov
fake news !!!

this list is totally unreliable as it contains a goalie. :sarcasm:

we all know the original @StevenToddIves doesn't rate goalies
 

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,605
25,039
Miami, FL
Keep in mind Yzerman went directly against the numbers-oriented draft people with earlier-than-expected picks of both Moritz Seider and Lucas Raymond. Kasper would fit into the mold as a player with outstanding intangibles and tools who simply didn't put up numbers because of his role in a professional men's league in his draft-eligible campaign.

Kasper really held his own for Austria in the WC and his tools are not only tantalizing, but something Yzerman covets at a position of need for the Red Wings. Kasper is one of the best skaters in the draft; he's an outstanding two-way center and he plays an extremely physical game. His offensive skills are also underrated in my opinion -- the fact he's so defensively responsible and such a team guy certainly costs him on the scoresheets. Kasper is a very good puck handler and a superlative playmaker.

I think if you're looking for a center in the 2022 draft and Wright and Cooley are off the board, Kasper might offer a higher floor and represent a safer pick than Savoie, Geekie, Lambert and McGroarty -- while his upside also could be appreciably higher than most people realize. I'm very high on the round Austrian center, and I also have the utmost respect for Yzerman's ability to make these kinds of great and gutsy draft picks.
Seider, sure, pretty much everyone had him somewhere in the mid-teens. I don't think it's really that surprising someone reached for a raw tools-y traits-y defenseman with enormous upside, teams do that all the time. We did the same thing a year later with Mukhamadullin.

Raymond on the other hand, I don't see how he was a reach. He was ranked #4 by McKeen, #4 by Central Scouting, #4 by Pronman, #5 by Cam Robinson (Dobber), #5 by ISS, and #6 by McKenzie. As far as I can tell the only major people that didn't have him going 4-6 are Button and Kourianous, who both had him 9th.

Both Kourianous and Button had very whacky boards in hindsight. Button had Hendrix Lapierre at #10 and Kourianous had him #43, for example. But I digress.

I definitely remember the feel around this board in 2020 was that 1/2/3 was pretty firmly set as Laf/Byfield/Steutzle, and then you had Drysdale/Sanderson/Rossi/Raymond/Holtz as the Tier 2 guys. And we were all hoping two forwards would go from 4-6 so that one of the D would drop to us, with Raymond and Rossi as the two forwards most likely to go between 4-6.

Seems like Raymond went exactly where he was supposed to?
 
Last edited:

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,583
22,960
St Petersburg
Its strange, that,Steve, you are calling Raymond as player, who was drafted higher than he was ranked. He obviously was top prospect, and he was the Detroit pick with Sanderson as alternative. I think that was our consensus in the draft day.

And, yeah, I think, Kasper is yzermans pick. May be they rank someone really higher and want some specific player, but I feel, if Yzerman will decide to draft for needs, Kasper has a big chance to be drafted in top 10. And if Kasper is top 10, I think it would be Detroit.
 
Last edited:

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
I really like Kasper too, but I can think of about 10 players that I like even more. I've mostly seen him ranked in the late 1st round, and considering his lack of production I'd be very, but positively, surprised if he went in the top10.
Production weighs more among draft writers than NHL scouts. Scouts see a 6'1-190 center who is the among the best defensive forwards in the draft and one of the best skaters in the draft -- a kid who hits like a Mack truck and plays with high intangibles -- and this is a kid they value a lot.

Once we get past the top centers in the draft -- Wright and Cooley -- there's question marks for everyone. Savoie lacks size and elite speed, a combination which might cause match-up problems in a top 6. Geekie's intangibles have been questioned at great length, as have Lambert's. Nazar and Kulich are still questions whether their NHL futures are up the middle or on the wing. McGroarty's skating is certainly the only thing standing between himself and the top 10. Gaucher is seen as a middle 6 center, albeit a very good one.

Kasper has none of these questions. In terms of physical tools plus intangibles, he's pretty flawless. Add in the elite speed and you have a very, very high floor player. At the very least, he projects to a physical, shut-down C for your bottom 6. But what if his offense was more limited by his age and role in the Sweden men's league than simply ability? We can see he handles the puck well and can really dish the puck with precision and flair.

Your guess is of course as good as mine, but I see Kasper as a very safe pick and also a very attractive pick. I see a dynamic-skating, physical two-way center capable of maybe hitting 60 points. That's pretty darned good, in my opinion.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Seider, sure, pretty much everyone had him somewhere in the mid-teens. I don't think it's really that surprising someone reached for a raw tools-y traits-y defenseman with enormous upside, teams do that all the time. We did the same thing a year later with Mukhamadullin.

Raymond on the other hand, I don't see how he was a reach. He was ranked #4 by McKeen, #4 by Central Scouting, #4 by Pronman, #5 by Cam Robinson (Dobber), #5 by ISS, and #6 by McKenzie. As far as I can tell the only major people that didn't have him going 4-6 are Button and Kourianous, who both had him 9th.

Both Kourianous and Button had very whacky boards in hindsight. Button had Hendrix Lapierre at #10 and Kourianous had him #43, for example. But I digress.

I definitely remember the feel around this board in 2020 was that 1/2/3 was pretty firmly set as Laf/Byfield/Steutzle, and then you had Drysdale/Sanderson/Rossi/Raymond/Holtz as the Tier 2 guys. And we were all hoping two forwards would go from 4-6 so that one of the D would drop to us, with Raymond and Rossi as the two forwards most likely to go between 4-6.

Seems like Raymond went exactly where he was supposed to?
Raymond was questioned on these boards (and Twitter) a lot because of his unimpressive stats in the SHL, I know this because I spent a lot of time defending him. So, that's just how I remember it. But I remember thinking it was a good pick by Detroit when they called Raymond's name.

As far as Seider, he's one of my big projection successes, I guess, so of course I remember it. I had him ranked at #11, and then watched the draft at a mostly-Red Wings draft party in Brooklyn. While a few of the guys there were freaking out because Twitter was roasting the Wings for the Seider pick, I spent a good deal of time assuring everyone that Seider was the runaway best RD in the 2019 class and about a country mile or two better than Philip Broberg. It was pretty funny, a whole bunch of drunk dudes from Michigan like: "it's ok, he's a draft writer and he says it's a great pick."

You're certainly correct in all your points here.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
I really like the depth in this class, it's so wide open in terms of consensus rankings after the top 10 or so prospects that many team's are going to have guys ranked in their top 15/20 falling well into the 2nd round. Devils should be able to get a good one at #37.
The big question -- which we've all asked several times over -- is where do the Russian players land?

We can probably safely assume that Mintyukov -- already playing in N.America -- still goes in the #12-#20 range. But what about the forwards? Yurov can fall past 20, despite a consensus ranking deservedly inside the top 10. MHLers are perennially drafted too low and this year, the drop could be cataclysmic. Could Perevalov and Trikozov fall to #37? It's possible, I suppose. To me, Perevalov is the most under-rated forward for the 1st round -- I have this dynamic, high-upside F ranked in my top 10 (#8), and I think he's simply a brilliant prospect with all-star, PPG upside at the NHL level.

The big question for me (and probably everyone else) is Ivan Miroshnichenko. Combining his Russian Factor with his recovery from Hodgkin's disease, his draft status is certainly very up in the air. But we also must keep in mind that -- in terms of raw upside -- he's top 4 among 2022-eligible forwards with Wright/Slafkovsky/Lambert. Judging on Miro's 2020-21 play -- which we unfortunately kind of have to -- I'd say his upside is more dynamic Gabriel Landeskog. That's pretty f**king good to have on your side.

I can't see Yurov and Miro getting past Buffalo and Arizona -- both of whom have 3 picks in the 2022 1st round. Winnipeg adding a late 1st round pick (from the Rangers) also lowers the chances they fall to Round 2, since the Jets are an incredibly adept team on draft day.

But I can foresee possibilities where Perevalov and Trikozov fall to Round 2, and they would both represent huge coups for the Devils with the #37 pick.
 

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,605
25,039
Miami, FL
Raymond was questioned on these boards (and Twitter) a lot because of his unimpressive stats in the SHL, I know this because I spent a lot of time defending him. So, that's just how I remember it. But I remember thinking it was a good pick by Detroit when they called Raymond's name.

As far as Seider, he's one of my big projection successes, I guess, so of course I remember it. I had him ranked at #11, and then watched the draft at a mostly-Red Wings draft party in Brooklyn. While a few of the guys there were freaking out because Twitter was roasting the Wings for the Seider pick, I spent a good deal of time assuring everyone that Seider was the runaway best RD in the 2019 class and about a country mile or two better than Philip Broberg. It was pretty funny, a whole bunch of drunk dudes from Michigan like: "it's ok, he's a draft writer and he says it's a great pick."

You're certainly correct in all your points here.
I remember watching the 2019 and someone interviewed Yzerman right after the pick was made. And they asked him about the pick and mentioned something along the lines of "some of our scouts thought he might go a bit later."

To which Yzerman responded [paraphrasing] "Really? We didn't. He's a big defenseman who scores points and can play on your top pairing, they don't grow on trees."

After we won the 2019 lottery I kind of stopped caring about prospect scouting, but I remember thinking at the draft that the pick wasn't as big of a reach as a lot of the talking heads made it out to be. DET needed defensemen and it was totally reasonable to think he had the highest upside in the draft outside of Byram.
 

Lou Bloom

Registered User
Oct 14, 2020
1,046
1,998
The big question -- which we've all asked several times over -- is where do the Russian players land?

We can probably safely assume that Mintyukov -- already playing in N.America -- still goes in the #12-#20 range. But what about the forwards? Yurov can fall past 20, despite a consensus ranking deservedly inside the top 10. MHLers are perennially drafted too low and this year, the drop could be cataclysmic. Could Perevalov and Trikozov fall to #37? It's possible, I suppose. To me, Perevalov is the most under-rated forward for the 1st round -- I have this dynamic, high-upside F ranked in my top 10 (#8), and I think he's simply a brilliant prospect with all-star, PPG upside at the NHL level.

The big question for me (and probably everyone else) is Ivan Miroshnichenko. Combining his Russian Factor with his recovery from Hodgkin's disease, his draft status is certainly very up in the air. But we also must keep in mind that -- in terms of raw upside -- he's top 4 among 2022-eligible forwards with Wright/Slafkovsky/Lambert. Judging on Miro's 2020-21 play -- which we unfortunately kind of have to -- I'd say his upside is more dynamic Gabriel Landeskog. That's pretty f**king good to have on your side.

I can't see Yurov and Miro getting past Buffalo and Arizona -- both of whom have 3 picks in the 2022 1st round. Winnipeg adding a late 1st round pick (from the Rangers) also lowers the chances they fall to Round 2, since the Jets are an incredibly adept team on draft day.

But I can foresee possibilities where Perevalov and Trikozov fall to Round 2, and they would both represent huge coups for the Devils with the #37 pick.
I'm a big fan of Gleb and Perevalov but even apart from the Russians you have tons of interesting players in that 15-50 area that are all over the place in rankings. I've seen Ostlund, Kulich and Mesar ranked as high as top 15 on some lists and well into the 2nd round on others. I've seen the USNTDP players being ranked all over the place apart from Cooley/Gauthier/Nazar. Guys like Firkus and Gaucher and intriguing forwards that are ranked anywhere from early 20s to mid 2nd round. Not to mention a ton of defensemen littered throughout like Rinzel, Bischel, Lundeau, Nelson, Kyrou, Odelius, Pickering, etc...

It's a very deep class and some players are going to fall further than people think and teams are going to get some good prospects well into the 2nd and even 3rd rounds of this class. I'd love for the Devils to acquire another 2nd rounder in this draft and really load up the farm.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
I'm a big fan of Gleb and Perevalov but even apart from the Russians you have tons of interesting players in that 15-50 area that are all over the place in rankings. I've seen Ostlund, Kulich and Mesar ranked as high as top 15 on some lists and well into the 2nd round on others. I've seen the USNTDP players being ranked all over the place apart from Cooley/Gauthier/Nazar. Guys like Firkus and Gaucher and intriguing forwards that are ranked anywhere from early 20s to mid 2nd round. Not to mention a ton of defensemen littered throughout like Rinzel, Bischel, Lundeau, Nelson, Kyrou, Odelius, Pickering, etc...

It's a very deep class and some players are going to fall further than people think and teams are going to get some good prospects well into the 2nd and even 3rd rounds of this class. I'd love for the Devils to acquire another 2nd rounder in this draft and really load up the farm.
Great post here, I absolutely agree.

I'd like to add to your points by isolating the players you mentioned and estimating their likely draft positions. Though there are always surprises -- for crying out loud Ottawa took Boucher at #10 last year and Montreal took Mailloux in the 1st round -- I do study the individual teams' drafting tendencies and each and every draft.

Kulich: I'm particularly biased here because I was possibly the first dude to laud him as a top 20 pick, his dominant performance at the U-18 tourney skyrocketed his stock. The sad fact is, several North American draft writers are simply too lazy to find feeds of Czech league games. NHL teams have seen him, and they know how good he is. He won't get past the 1st round.

Mesar: a dynamic offensive talent with high-end skating, he may also have been a victim of consensus writers not watching him in league play because Slovakia. He has no singular weakness which can hold him back in any normal circumstance, and is also a heavy bet to be gone in the 1st round.

Ostlund: though his offensive dynamism is on par with Mesar and just behind Kulich, he is small and slight and this concerns many NHL front offices, especially with centers. This is certainly a kid who can fall to #37 despite immense offensive talent.

Firkus: an incredibly dynamic offensive player, but also one with weaknesses which concern NHL scouts more than most draft evaluators -- he's small, can get caught on the perimeter, and needs a lot of work in his 200-foot game. Some team can fall in love with his high-end scoring capabilities and take him as high as #20, but he can also conceivably fall to #37.

Gaucher: he's big, strong, physical and plays an outstanding two-way game with fantastic face-off acumen. NHL teams love centers like this, and he'll very likely be gone in the 1st round despite an offensive ceiling as a middle-6 center.

Rinzel: he's really the Scott Morrow of this year's draft -- a USHS kid who has 1st-pairing type talent but played low competition. Though this is scary to NHL teams, many of them (the Devils, anyone?) have to feel pretty stupid about passing on Morrow last year. Do we learn our lesson? Could go in the 20's or fall to the mid-2nd round.

Bischel: has as much draft "helium" as anyone in the draft right now, and has shot up to #1 on several LD boards. Very likely to go in the late first round right now -- he's 6'5, skates well and has some offensive ability. Teams watching K'Andre Miller excelling every night in the playoffs won't miss out on Bischsel. I'd bet he's gone by #37.

Luneau: he's a terrific, two-way, high-floor RD without any discernible weakness; as such, he'll go in the 1st round. I think some draft writers overlook him because he's not a *sexy* pick, but NHL teams all need guys like Luneau.

Nelson: certainly a kid who can fall. I'd say he's the Lukas Cormier of the 2022 class -- an outstanding offensive defenseman who lacks size and can pretty consistently be beaten in his own zone. Draft writers who don't watch the players normally don't care, they're just wowed by the numbers. But Nelson isn't just problematic defensively, he's downright *bad*. As a RD who can score, he's certainly got a chance to go in the 1st. But, like Cormier, he's also a kid who can fall to the 3rd round. I don't see the Devils taking him, because Fitzgerald has shown a preference for more size on the blueline. I also think this is a good thing, because this is a very problematic player to have on an NHL blueline.

Kyrou: I think you're smoking something if you take him in the 2nd round, much less the 1st. He's like a lower-ceiling Nelson, at best. I'll go so far to say that if you take either Nelson or Kyrou with Rinzel or Luneau available, you need a new scouting team.

Odelius/Pickering: both LD, and I don't see NJ considering a LD this early in the draft unless Bichsel were to miraculously fall. Either could go as high as the 20s or as low as the 40s.
 

Lou Bloom

Registered User
Oct 14, 2020
1,046
1,998
Great post here, I absolutely agree.

I'd like to add to your points by isolating the players you mentioned and estimating their likely draft positions. Though there are always surprises -- for crying out loud Ottawa took Boucher at #10 last year and Montreal took Mailloux in the 1st round -- I do study the individual teams' drafting tendencies and each and every draft.

Kulich: I'm particularly biased here because I was possibly the first dude to laud him as a top 20 pick, his dominant performance at the U-18 tourney skyrocketed his stock. The sad fact is, several North American draft writers are simply too lazy to find feeds of Czech league games. NHL teams have seen him, and they know how good he is. He won't get past the 1st round.

Mesar: a dynamic offensive talent with high-end skating, he may also have been a victim of consensus writers not watching him in league play because Slovakia. He has no singular weakness which can hold him back in any normal circumstance, and is also a heavy bet to be gone in the 1st round.

Ostlund: though his offensive dynamism is on par with Mesar and just behind Kulich, he is small and slight and this concerns many NHL front offices, especially with centers. This is certainly a kid who can fall to #37 despite immense offensive talent.

Firkus: an incredibly dynamic offensive player, but also one with weaknesses which concern NHL scouts more than most draft evaluators -- he's small, can get caught on the perimeter, and needs a lot of work in his 200-foot game. Some team can fall in love with his high-end scoring capabilities and take him as high as #20, but he can also conceivably fall to #37.

Gaucher: he's big, strong, physical and plays an outstanding two-way game with fantastic face-off acumen. NHL teams love centers like this, and he'll very likely be gone in the 1st round despite an offensive ceiling as a middle-6 center.

Rinzel: he's really the Scott Morrow of this year's draft -- a USHS kid who has 1st-pairing type talent but played low competition. Though this is scary to NHL teams, many of them (the Devils, anyone?) have to feel pretty stupid about passing on Morrow last year. Do we learn our lesson? Could go in the 20's or fall to the mid-2nd round.

Bischel: has as much draft "helium" as anyone in the draft right now, and has shot up to #1 on several LD boards. Very likely to go in the late first round right now -- he's 6'5, skates well and has some offensive ability. Teams watching K'Andre Miller excelling every night in the playoffs won't miss out on Bischsel. I'd bet he's gone by #37.

Luneau: he's a terrific, two-way, high-floor RD without any discernible weakness; as such, he'll go in the 1st round. I think some draft writers overlook him because he's not a *sexy* pick, but NHL teams all need guys like Luneau.

Nelson: certainly a kid who can fall. I'd say he's the Lukas Cormier of the 2022 class -- an outstanding offensive defenseman who lacks size and can pretty consistently be beaten in his own zone. Draft writers who don't watch the players normally don't care, they're just wowed by the numbers. But Nelson isn't just problematic defensively, he's downright *bad*. As a RD who can score, he's certainly got a chance to go in the 1st. But, like Cormier, he's also a kid who can fall to the 3rd round. I don't see the Devils taking him, because Fitzgerald has shown a preference for more size on the blueline. I also think this is a good thing, because this is a very problematic player to have on an NHL blueline.

Kyrou: I think you're smoking something if you take him in the 2nd round, much less the 1st. He's like a lower-ceiling Nelson, at best. I'll go so far to say that if you take either Nelson or Kyrou with Rinzel or Luneau available, you need a new scouting team.

Odelius/Pickering: both LD, and I don't see NJ considering a LD this early in the draft unless Bichsel were to miraculously fall. Either could go as high as the 20s or as low as the 40s.
I wasn't naming those guys as targets for the Devils (or even players I'm particularly high on), just giving examples to the wide variance in rankings this year. Personally the potential "fallers" I'd be interested in are Chesley, Ostlund, Firkus, Gaucher, Trikokov, Perevalov and while not a faller I'm a big fan of Noah Warren as a guy who'll probably go higher than his rankings indicate. Like I said before I'd love to add another 2nd rounder in this draft and add someone like Warren along with a potential 1st round faller with both of those picks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Great post here, I absolutely agree.

I'd like to add to your points by isolating the players you mentioned and estimating their likely draft positions. Though there are always surprises -- for crying out loud Ottawa took Boucher at #10 last year and Montreal took Mailloux in the 1st round -- I do study the individual teams' drafting tendencies and each and every draft.

Kulich: I'm particularly biased here because I was possibly the first dude to laud him as a top 20 pick, his dominant performance at the U-18 tourney skyrocketed his stock. The sad fact is, several North American draft writers are simply too lazy to find feeds of Czech league games. NHL teams have seen him, and they know how good he is. He won't get past the 1st round.

Mesar: a dynamic offensive talent with high-end skating, he may also have been a victim of consensus writers not watching him in league play because Slovakia. He has no singular weakness which can hold him back in any normal circumstance, and is also a heavy bet to be gone in the 1st round.

Ostlund: though his offensive dynamism is on par with Mesar and just behind Kulich, he is small and slight and this concerns many NHL front offices, especially with centers. This is certainly a kid who can fall to #37 despite immense offensive talent.

Firkus: an incredibly dynamic offensive player, but also one with weaknesses which concern NHL scouts more than most draft evaluators -- he's small, can get caught on the perimeter, and needs a lot of work in his 200-foot game. Some team can fall in love with his high-end scoring capabilities and take him as high as #20, but he can also conceivably fall to #37.

Gaucher: he's big, strong, physical and plays an outstanding two-way game with fantastic face-off acumen. NHL teams love centers like this, and he'll very likely be gone in the 1st round despite an offensive ceiling as a middle-6 center.

Rinzel: he's really the Scott Morrow of this year's draft -- a USHS kid who has 1st-pairing type talent but played low competition. Though this is scary to NHL teams, many of them (the Devils, anyone?) have to feel pretty stupid about passing on Morrow last year. Do we learn our lesson? Could go in the 20's or fall to the mid-2nd round.

Bischel: has as much draft "helium" as anyone in the draft right now, and has shot up to #1 on several LD boards. Very likely to go in the late first round right now -- he's 6'5, skates well and has some offensive ability. Teams watching K'Andre Miller excelling every night in the playoffs won't miss out on Bischsel. I'd bet he's gone by #37.

Luneau: he's a terrific, two-way, high-floor RD without any discernible weakness; as such, he'll go in the 1st round. I think some draft writers overlook him because he's not a *sexy* pick, but NHL teams all need guys like Luneau.

Nelson: certainly a kid who can fall. I'd say he's the Lukas Cormier of the 2022 class -- an outstanding offensive defenseman who lacks size and can pretty consistently be beaten in his own zone. Draft writers who don't watch the players normally don't care, they're just wowed by the numbers. But Nelson isn't just problematic defensively, he's downright *bad*. As a RD who can score, he's certainly got a chance to go in the 1st. But, like Cormier, he's also a kid who can fall to the 3rd round. I don't see the Devils taking him, because Fitzgerald has shown a preference for more size on the blueline. I also think this is a good thing, because this is a very problematic player to have on an NHL blueline.

Kyrou: I think you're smoking something if you take him in the 2nd round, much less the 1st. He's like a lower-ceiling Nelson, at best. I'll go so far to say that if you take either Nelson or Kyrou with Rinzel or Luneau available, you need a new scouting team.

Odelius/Pickering: both LD, and I don't see NJ considering a LD this early in the draft unless Bichsel were to miraculously fall. Either could go as high as the 20s or as low as the 40s.
I had a stray thought about why NJ is seemingly ignoring RD in recent drafts. It's that RD doesn't fit the NJ idea of draft value. RD are rare and ones with size and skating ability and IQ are rarer. Throw in the ability to create offense and they are almost unicorns. As such, they essentially have to be overdrafted to get them. Thus, they don't show as valuable as other positions. I think you've implicitly said this when we've discussed right shot defenders that might fall to the second and you've consistently suggested that a falling Russian forward with upside is probably a better pick. On some level, I think this applies almost every round. Beyond Jiricek and Nemec how many legit RD prospects are there in the draft? You've identified more than a handful, but hardly as many potential high upside RD as you've identified excellent mid to late round forwards. If you want a real RD prospect you probably have to suck it up and draft them one round higher than they really merit. I mean, was Morrow really looked at as a high second round pick headed into the draft last year? Maybe but I bet a number of teams saw a risky pick based on being older in a high school league. The smart team looked closely and said they'd roll the dice on the RD in the early second round and it was a good decision. Was it a value pick? Probably not at the time but it was the right pick. Tom's got to get away from the list (recall he mentioned that when drafting Mukhamadullin) or he's never going to pick a RD, or at least a RD that matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

Ad

Ad

Ad