No More Subban
GHG
- Apr 28, 2010
- 17,663
- 6,907
That's so ridiculous. Wtf
Get the hell out of there, Ivan! Montreal will take good care of you.
That's so ridiculous. Wtf
To me if this is true , that tells me they are négociating. Thats is the Russian way to force the Habs to up the anteThey could but they won't. It seems they are going to be as petty as possible.
This has been the talk today in this thread, with other similar tweets.
Arber should’ve went too. Have a “chat” with Rotty.Russia's going to Russia. I'm even surprised he got as much ice time as he did after Kent went down, I would have thought they would have taken that as a slight or a threat in some way.
Just two more months, Ivan. Hold on lad.
In the new Robert, here's what I see next to douchebag...That's for moron.
the laws of men don't apply to a Demigod...What are the chances he can’t come next season either? What control has SKA over this?
To me if this is true , that tells me they are négociating. Thats is the Russian way to force the Habs to up the ante
Yep. And Molson's not going to risk anything to bring Demidov over early. I mean we'd love to and if there's a legal way to do it I'm sure he will but there's no way he's going to put himself into a compromising position over this.Habs can't up the ante as it would be cap circumvention.
Who cares? Flyers did it.Habs can't up the ante as it would be cap circumvention.
Who cares? Flyers did it.
They just pay of SKA and SKA can just say they let him go early since their season is over. No one needs to know why?Yep. And Molson's not going to risk anything to bring Demidov over early. I mean we'd love to and if there's a legal way to do it I'm sure he will but there's no way he's going to put himself into a compromising position over this.
Michkov was let out at least a year of his contract.Flyers didn't though
Yeah... those kinds of things never come out. Good idea!They just pay of SKA and SKA can just say they let him go early since their season is over. No one needs to know why?
Michkov was let out at least a year of his contract.
Cap circumvention or not it’s almost certainly what happenedTwo years actually.
But not by the Flyers giving money for it. That is cap circumvention.
It came from the Flyers. Briere doesn't give a shit about rules. Maybe when the Hab s visited him they gave him a bag of cash.Two years actually.
But not by the Flyers giving money for it. That is cap circumvention.
Yeah... those kinds of things never come out. Good idea!
It came from the Flyers. Briere doesn't give a shit about rules. Maybe when the Hab s visited him they gave him a bag of cash.
Or his agent could advance him the money,
We don't know what happened so why just make claims without evidence? The fact is that the KHL does not allow NHL teams to buy out player's contracts. The player must buy out his own contract.
Maybe Michkov persuaded a local investor to loan him the money. Maybe Philly fed him money through a third party but that would be investigated by the NHL and they could risk serious repercussions.
We don't know and people repeating the same unsubstantiated claim as fact is exactly why we have charlatans rising to power and influence.
Why is it so difficult to simply admit that we don't know instead of deferring to confirmation bias?
Because there will never be evidence just like no one knows where Michkov got the money from. It is obvious to anyone with a brain that the Flyers knew he wasn't going to stay 3 years when they took him.We don't know what happened so why just make claims without evidence? The fact is that the KHL does not allow NHL teams to buy out player's contracts. The player must buy out his own contract.
Maybe Michkov persuaded a local investor to loan him the money. Maybe Philly fed him money through a third party but that would be investigated by the NHL and they could risk serious repercussions.
We don't know and people repeating the same unsubstantiated claim as fact is exactly why we have charlatans rising to power and influence.
Why is it so difficult to simply admit that we don't know instead of deferring to confirmation bias?
I suspect if Montreal was permitted to buy out by the contract by both the NHL and KHL they absolutely would have done so by now. They do not appear to be legally able to do so unless I am mistaken, so let's just wait for actual news instead of building a narrative that is without a foundation based on facts/evidence.
And the Flyers could have given the agent a guarantee that they would cover the loan if Michkov didn't repay it.I've heard of agents giving substantial loans to players in certain circumstances. I don't know why something like that couldn't simply be the case. It seems like the easiest, most probably way to buy out his contract. I doubt a hockey player with his pedigree would have any issue finding a loan. I don't know his family or their financial situation, but he might have also received an inheritance. I don't think there's really any need for behind the Scenes shenanigans, but maybe I'm too naive.