I agree. But also, most coaches usually don't have their #1 and #2 centers being one of the best ever at any position and in the conversation for best #2 center ever, with the luxury of putting a 30 goal scorer on the third line. Sure the roster isn't a stanley cup contender right now, but it's not like he turned water into wine in 16-17.Most of those coaches had not won 2 straight Cups…
having said, IMO Sully has lost their ear since about 18-19…
He is an upgrade but a very mediocre one.Absolutely zero interest in Jason Botterill.
Not because I think he's an idiot or a bad gm. I just don't want someone coming in with any familiarity with this roster or coach. I want someone who is far enough removed from it to make actual analytical decisions and not emotional ones.
Hextall and Burke should have been that but they totally bombed and clearly had no interest in using analytics based on the players they brought in.
Yep.Man getting a GM that will mix some analytics with the eye test will be perfect. We don't need some old school dude who uses the force...
Contract vs. Age vs. Analytics == Contracts like Carter and Granlund would have never been offered/taken.
New GM could be crap but at least we are trying.
Realistically, I think any GM when being interviewed will "ask about firing Sullivan" and if the Management group says no then I don't think we'll get the good GM's people have been posting.
We'll know a lot more in the next few weeks... good first step.
That‘s true. Re water and wine, that was Kessel lol! Still miss that hot dog guy!…I agree. But also, most coaches usually don't have their #1 and #2 centers being one of the best ever at any position and in the conversation for best #2 center ever, with the luxury of putting a 30 goal scorer on the third line. Sure the roster isn't a stanley cup contender right now, but it's not like he turned water into wine in 16-17.
He is an upgrade but a very mediocre one.
Well There you go using Common Sense & RealityAs an aside, I find it fascinating that fans jump between "Hextall ruined this terrific team with his horrible moves" and "Sullivan hasn't had the pieces he needs to have success". Especially because the 2 playoff series with Hextall were substantially more competitive than the last 2 playoff series with JR.
This "great team" that Hextall ruined lost in the qualifying round to Montreal and got swept by the Islanders in the two previous years. But apparently that wasn't Sullivan's fault, he just needs a better team around him!
Ironically, they subsequently had a guy in his early 20's on the third line who now at 26 scored more goals in a season than Kessel ever did. But said young and developing player was given a short leash, which seems to be a theme if you do a deep dive on player usage in the 5 years the Pens haven't won a playoff series.Yep.
Even an analytics beginner would never have touched Carter or Granlund. Argh…
That‘s true. Re water and wine, that was Kessel lol! Still miss that hot dog guy!…
I'm more upset over Hextall's decisions this year than anything prior. His trade deadline this year was nothing short of disastrous, and nobody is using any hindsight to say that. We all knew what an awful idea Granlund was.The Carter extension was horrible, but let's not re-write what he did when he first got here. Carter had 25 goals and 56 points in 90 games in his first 2 years with the Penguins and was super productive (8 goals and 10 points in 13 games) in the playoffs. The mistake was giving him 2 years with a NMC, not re-signing him.
He should have just gotten a 1 year deal that would keep being 1 year deals as long as he performed. If he wouldn't sign a 1 year deal or if he started playing poorly, you just let him walk.
I read the article and I don't think Yohe is actually wrong with any of what he wrote there.
I'm more upset over Hextall's decisions this year than anything prior. His trade deadline this year was nothing short of disastrous, and nobody is using any hindsight to say that. We all knew what an awful idea Granlund was.
He was shooting at like a 25%. It was easy to see that was substantial. You don’t need an analytics department to see that was an outlier.The Carter extension was horrible, but let's not re-write what he did when he first got here. Carter had 25 goals and 56 points in 90 games in his first 2 years with the Penguins and was super productive (8 goals and 10 points in 13 games) in the playoffs. The mistake was giving him 2 years with a NMC, not re-signing him.
He should have just gotten a 1 year deal that would keep being 1 year deals as long as he performed. If he wouldn't sign a 1 year deal or if he started playing poorly, you just let him walk.
I think Hextall signed him to 2 year deal because he had no faith in Blueger or anyone in system, Now you can argue he shouldn't have signed him to it. But that is my thought on whyHe was shooting at like a 25%. It was easy to see that was substantial. You don’t need an analytics department to see that was an outlier.
So obvious it begs the question whether a 60 year old former NHL player even understands basic math enough to make that connection.He was shooting at like a 25%. It was easy to see that was substantial. You don’t need an analytics department to see that was an outlier.
He was shooting at like a 25%. It was easy to see that was substantial. You don’t need an analytics department to see that was an outlier.
Some of his moves (Carter, Mccann) look horrendous in retrospect, but like I said, this year was the big one for me where it was obvious he f***ed up.Yeah I think the wheels fell off with Hextall after the end of last season. His performance as GM in his first 2 years was good overall. Things went to shit this off-season, though.
Almost every post of theirs is accompanied with a personal insult.
Is that who everyone is responding to? I keep seeing people responding to someone, but never see who they're responding to or what post.Ignore is your friend.
He was shooting at like a 25%. It was easy to see that was substantial. You don’t need an analytics department to see that was an outlier.
Yeah. Carter was good when he first got here. The resigning was the disaster. Anyone with half a brain could have seen his game was fall off a cliff sooner than later.The Carter extension was horrible, but let's not re-write what he did when he first got here. Carter had 25 goals and 56 points in 90 games in his first 2 years with the Penguins and was super productive (8 goals and 10 points in 13 games) in the playoffs. The mistake was giving him 2 years with a NMC, not re-signing him.
He should have just gotten a 1 year deal that would keep being 1 year deals as long as he performed. If he wouldn't sign a 1 year deal or if he started playing poorly, you just let him walk.