Paralyzer
Oilers Win Cup in 2025
LOL Lucic AND a 2nd for an equally worse contract? Maybe Eriksson + 6th for Lucic + 4th, but if you think the value is a 2nd or higher, you are high on the koolaid.
Even still, with it being Seattle he may waive for the edraft. Should it come to it.If you are traded before its kicked in the team you are traded to does not have to honour it.
You are technically right that traded with one the club has the option to reinstate but most people with nmc just don't agree to be traded unless the club they are going to agrees to honour the nmc effectively keeping it.
Lucic might not care tho if he has any self awareness he should know his contract is already super hard to move without needing a nmc.
Idk would he really care that much riding a bus around ? Assuming the nucks would even want him on their ahl team it's not like he's a prospect and if he decided to pout you probably don't want him riding around with your prospects , they might just let him sit at home if they decided to waive him.Not true exactly. His has a nmc for the duration of his contract.
When players with movement protection get traded those clauses do not automatically transfer.
But the players who waive them they can always ask the new team to sign a waiver to accept the current movement protection otherwise they won’t waive to go to that new team.
Lucic would be insane to waive his nmc. It assured him of remaining in the nhl rather than get redden in the A.
Can't see why he wouldn't . Not likely to be picked plus it's a nice city and really close to Vancouver anywaysEven still, with it being Seattle he may waive for the edraft. Should it come to it.
LOL Lucic AND a 2nd for an equally worse contract? Maybe Eriksson + 6th for Lucic + 4th, but if you think the value is a 2nd or higher, you are high on the koolaid.
Not true exactly. His has a nmc for the duration of his contract.
When players with movement protection get traded those clauses do not automatically transfer.
But the players who waive them they can always ask the new team to sign a waiver to accept the current movement protection otherwise they won’t waive to go to that new team.
Lucic would be insane to waive his nmc. It assured him of remaining in the nhl rather than get redden in the A.
No team is going to trade for Lucic and expect him to be anything more than a 4th liner at best. Which means he has arguably the worst contract in the NHL
LOL Lucic AND a 2nd for an equally worse contract? Maybe Eriksson + 6th for Lucic + 4th, but if you think the value is a 2nd or higher, you are high on the koolaid.
I don’t think that is true. When Lucic signed his contract with Edmonton, he forgot what made him such a good player. He never was fast, but he used to play with grit, be aggressive in the corners and play around the net.
As soon as this guy landed in Edmonton, he changed his game to a more finesse, perimeter game. I’m not sure if he’s just tired of the grind and physical play or simply lost his way, but if he get it back (form a fresh start) he could be back to its 40-50 points, aggressive plays from before.
Give me a break.Lucic for Eriksson makes sense, but the cost is more than a 2nd. Not only is Lucic's contract for an additional year, but the Oilers expect to receive a better player for each of the next three years.
Eriksson for Lucic (NMC not honoured), 2019 3rd (NYI), and 2020 1st (EDM). 1st is top 10 protected, in which case it becomes becomes 2021 1st (EDM).
Theres no such thing as an "equally worse" contract to Lucics
Especially if you were the Oilers owner and are dealing with real money
24 million Lucic vs 18 million. Eriksson
Almost half of that 18 million is actually paid for already so really Katz would be looking at
24 million vs 10million
So you were saying something about " equally worse " ??
If he were to waive for van. Would that mean his NMC now could be gone forever?
Theres no such thing as an "equally worse" contract to Lucics
Especially if you were the Oilers owner and are dealing with real money
24 million Lucic vs 18 million. Eriksson
Almost half of that 18 million is actually paid for already so really Katz would be looking at
24 million vs 10million
So you were saying something about " equally worse " ??
They both have produced the same. Their contracts are about the same. Eriksson is older than Lucic. Definitely Equally Worse.
You just ignored the 14 million dollar difference and 1 yr extra longer of Oilers having to have a spot for Lucic and waiting valuable depth for McDavid and Drai??
Theres no such thing as an "equally worse" contract to Lucics
Especially if you were the Oilers owner and are dealing with real money
24 million Lucic vs 18 million. Eriksson
Almost half of that 18 million is actually paid for already so really Katz would be looking at
24 million vs 10million
So you were saying something about " equally worse " ??
Loui Eriksson for Lucic and PuljujarviIt's obviously gotta be a deal around Lucic and Eriksson with Edmonton adding a valuable asset or two.
Loui Eriksson for Lucic and Puljujarvi
Who cares that he's 30, he skates like he's 50.Id easily swap out Loui for Lucic.. Even if the plus added to Lucic was very minimal.
Loui has been awful for the canucks and he turns 34 soon. At least Lucic is still 30 years old(turns 31 soon) so he is a few years younger.
The only reason i expect a slight add to Lucic is the fact he has an extra year longer on his deal. But if these guys were same age with same length of deal, i prefer Lucic anyday of the week.
Loui doesnt accomplish anything on the ice. There are many games ill watch and not even notice him ever. At least Lucic plays physical and can put fear into opposition and chips in here and there. He atleast accomplishes stuff on the ice
Who cares that he's 30, he skates like he's 50.