And Marchand ain’t?
I already acknowledged him, yet you cited others in error.
And Marchand ain’t?
Whats so laughable about that? I feel like people who have actually played decently high level hockey have insight to offer to these boards.
I already acknowledged him, yet you cited others in error.
What kind of insight is 'I have played hockey at a high level'? To me that's just something you pull off when you don't have any arguments to support your opinion.Whats so laughable about that? I feel like people who have actually played decently high level hockey have insight to offer to these boards.
I mean it wasn't me who said it, but I agree.What kind of insight is 'I have played hockey at a high level'? To me that's just something you pull off when you don't have any arguments to support your opinion.
Yes, but if you want to play dumb that Crosby missing nearly two years of consistent play having effect on how concussions were viewed feel free.
I have no idea how Cooke has such a lack of integrity and honor to look himself in the mirror after that career. Piece of intent to injure filth.
That hit used to happen all the time, this was just the moment they decided to start cracking down on it.
Richards on Booth
Richards on Petrovicky
Armstrong on Letowski
You would probably both be at fault. One for breaking order, the other for not driving defensively enough.Why is Crosby in front of him?
Did Steckels path change direction or did Crosbys?
Its like saying if you're driving and someone cuts you off in your lane not looking where they're going, sides wipes you and they crash into the wall, somehow I'm at fault?
You would probably both be at fault. One for breaking order, the other for not driving defensively enough.
& 10 years later, people are STILL trying to say it was intentional
.
I mean I agree, Matt Cooke was a pos. But let’s not pretend here how you have no idea how he’s looking in the mirror when your team employed Marchand or Chara...I have no idea how Cooke has such a lack of integrity and honor to look himself in the mirror after that career. Piece of intent to injure filth.
Crappy hit.
Wrong. It was this horrible act by Cooke that made the league start their crackdown.
If he didn’t get Savard’s head and only hit through his body, this woulda been seen as a huge hit.
No it wouldn't have because Cooke doesn't come in with any speed or force there. It's barely even a hit, he just clips the guy. A hit is a bodycheck. The only way that act can do any sort of actual damage is if he clips his head, which he did.
I have no idea how Cooke has such a lack of integrity and honor to look himself in the mirror after that career. Piece of intent to injure filth.
In my beer league, EVERY crosscheck, head-shot and slash from me is intentional. Yet HFers continue to claim that many cheap shots are "unintentional."
Maybe I'm just a much better aim and many NHL players.
And I'm not a Crosby fan - I like seeing him get hit. But not with a cheap shot.
Problem is you were never a pro athlete.lol you mean to tell me you’ve never been run into, gone right through them and kept moving? Because I definitely have, that shit didn’t knock me down and I have a puck to go get, I’m not going to stand around looking at everyone until I’m sure they know it was an accident