Niagara Bill
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2021
- 2,066
- 1,538
Keefe is NOT , the issue, he can coach, BUT, replacing him and his relationships with the players may be the solution.
I have not seen anything from this team that makes me think spending more assets is wise. I'd fire Keefe and bring in Gallant if he passes a background check, and then decide if we should add or let the chips fall where they might.Outside of few fans has anyone ever considered this team a legit Cup contender? Winning a round or two every other year is the hope and expectation.
I still believe if they can add a couple of reliable D they could easily win 2 rounds this year if they get the right matchup.
Babcock + Lou
This is how logical this response is and this should be the answer every time.
That should happen, but I believe Shanahan will not allow it. Would love to see him get fired, then bring in Clark or Gilmour (I know, nor previous experience whatsoever). Just wishful thinking on my part, players who played with heart and passion for the Leafs!i can’t imagine he is saying to much to them in private and if he is they certainly are not listening because it’s the same show year after year
Because if he is doing it in private they sure aren’t listening so maybe it’s time he put some heat on them in the public
I think Lou was great for creating a team first culture...no BS / individual type stuff.
Babcock unfortunately was a terrible person that it effected his ability to coach the team. The issue is Keefe was the opposite direction, too soft on the players. Literally walked back comments because he didn't want to hurt feelings.
Personally I don’t think Treliving and Keefe’s overall philosophies match very well. A guy like Gallant I think fits in better with Treliving.
Anything they add has to be part of the future. Making trades for a rental in an effort to secure a playoff spot or jockeying for position cannot happen again.I have not seen anything from this team that makes me think spending more assets is wise. I'd fire Keefe and bring in Gallant if he passes a background check, and then decide if we should add or let the chips fall where they might.
If Minnesota fires Evason, I’d definitely be interested in him being Keefe’s replacement.Do you have a source on his reasoning for walking back the comments?
Also want to pull up full quotes of what was originally said and what he backtracked on? Full quotes, not snippets.
I don't remember it being as bad as most made it out to be.
I think Dean Evason fits best.
Just based on how he built his team in Calgary Treliving wants players who can punch people and skill is secondary, that seems like the best coach.
If Minnesota fires Evason, I’d definitely be interested in him being Keefe’s replacement.
It's a little narrow minded to think that if someone isn't happy with things then they must want Lou and Babcock back.I think Lou was great for creating a team first culture...no BS / individual type stuff.
Babcock unfortunately was a terrible person that it effected his ability to coach the team. The issue is Keefe was the opposite direction, too soft on the players. Literally walked back comments because he didn't want to hurt feelings.
Matty starting to make me think he is not going to get us to the promised land. If he does not "have it in him", maybe we should explore moving him to a US based team willing to overpay. Was watching the Blues yesterday afternoon and was thinking they could use an American stud as the face of their franchise. I'd be interested in a combination of Thomas, Kyrou, and Neighbours and picks and prospects.Anything they add has to be part of the future. Making trades for a rental in an effort to secure a playoff spot or jockeying for position cannot happen again.
I love Gallant, but would he be able to turn Matthews into a playoff stud? I don’t know if Matthews has it in him and I don’t think he’d like Gallant.
St Louis is interesting but I don’t see Matthews fitting in well in that town. He’s a New York, Toronto, LA type of guy.Matty starting to make me think he is not going to get us to the promised land. If he does not "have it in him", maybe we should explore moving him to a US based team willing to overpay. Was watching the Blues yesterday afternoon and was thinking they could use an American stud as the face of their franchise. I'd be interested in a combination of Thomas, Kyrou, and Neighbours and picks and prospects.
Record aside, Minnesota plays a pretty well structured system. They’re hard on the forecheck and pucks. If things aren’t going well, he’s not afraid to demote or call star players out. IMO Minnesota has been one of those teams overachieving over the past couple years but it’s because their players buy into the system and Evason and Guerin have them playing the right way.Because he has a good record? Or just because?
Record aside, Minnesota plays a pretty well structured system. They’re hard on the forecheck and pucks. If things aren’t going well, he’s not afraid to demote or call star players out. IMO Minnesota has been one of those teams overachieving over the past couple years but it’s because their players buy into the system and Evason and Guerin have them playing the right way.
It's a little narrow minded to think that if someone isn't happy with things then they must want Lou and Babcock back.
I think there is a very large group that don't want any of them(Lou/Babcock/Dubs/Keefe)
The fact they even made the playoffs the past few years with 15+ million of their salary cap tied up in buyouts is impressive.And this year? What do you think about them losing more 1st rounds in a row than us?
Evason is a beauty and would be great here.The fact they even made the playoffs the past few years with 15+ million of their salary cap tied up in buyouts is impressive.
Keefe is NOT , the issue, he can coach, BUT, replacing him and his relationships with the players may be the solution.
Basically 20 games in and sitting in the last wildcard spot. Don’t know how that’s even acceptable from this senior management group if they actually consider us a legitimate contender…I'd agree with this... I think maybe he's lost the room at this point. I have a lengthy post in the trades thread about this... but I think it's time to replace the coach, and the President... basically the management group, as it's time to get a new look, and figure out exactly who in the group has the will to win, and who doesn't... as I just don't see it from here, but I'm just an armchair QB.
The fact they even made the playoffs the past few years with 15+ million of their salary cap tied up in buyouts is impressive.
Why would Arizona’s coach be the best in the league right now?So Arizona's coach must be the best in the league right now?
Keefe must be doing really well with 5 million in dead cap.
Why would Arizona’s coach be the best in the league right now?
Basically 20 games in and sitting in the last wildcard spot. Don’t know how that’s even acceptable from this senior management group if they actually consider us a legitimate contender…
Were the Leafs not able to use the money spent on Muzzin and Murray towards others player? Are the Leafs not able to add players with Klingberg going on LTIR now?They have over 20 million in dead cap.
Clearly this is very important to you.