Doesn’t play great D, small and weak in his own zone. Defensive awareness and compete level leaves lot to be decided in his own zone.
Excellent offensive instincts and skating, development with D men is almost never linear. He might a rough few years ahead of him in his own zone.
Trade Hughes for Makar or Heiskanen, any of the 3 would fail in the current role he’s expected to play. He’s a 21 year old offensive defenceman whoa expected to play both sides of the ice because Vancouver only has one other good defender
No dispute that they are better, it’s the fact they wouldn’t succeed with the supporting cast and would still flounder in Vancouver’s systemMakar and especially Heiskanen are drastically better two way players than Hughes. They’re just straight up more complete and better players than Hughes.
Trade Hughes for Makar or Heiskanen, any of the 3 would fail in the current role he’s expected to play. He’s a 21 year old offensive defenceman whoa expected to play both sides of the ice because Vancouver only has one other good defender
thats what you got out of what he said? hahahaHow can we know this? Is the greatness of Quinn Hughes so undeniable that Makar, or Heiskanen would crumble if put in his place? Weird take.
thats what you got out of what he said? hahaha
Makar is the real deal Holyfield.Cale Makar led his team to a win in his last game while the Avs were missing six players, including MacKinnon, Johnson, and Toews.
He tallied one assist, played 26:23, including 4 minutes on the PK.
I’m tired of people acting like he’s carried by his teammates and all his success is based off of situation.
I don’t want to say bad things about Quinn Hughes because I think he’s a bright young talent in the game. When he’s at top form he’s a really special player.
But, damn people need to realize that these two players have different styles and Makar is not just thriving because of his situation.
Ian Macintyre article just said in today’s game the Canucks were outshot 10 to 3 when Hughes was on the ice during 5 v 5. Need more?What about 150? There's a reason he gets so many points, it's not just luck. He's still a dominant player on the ice and controls, breaks out of the zone. He's flawed as a 21 yo, it doesn't make him overrated because everyone's already taking that into account.
Vancouver's problems defensively right now fall as much on the forwards as the defensemen IMO.
and you don't think this is a little bit self inflicted by the vancouver fanbase on hfb?Yes however some just can't be happy they have to hate on others oh well. What can you do I suppose.
Reminds me of a young Erik Karlsson - should be a forward.
Reminds me of a young Erik Karlsson - should be a forward.
Except...Mr EK65 at Quinn's age had just finished his rookie season in the NHL, 5 goals, 21 assists in 60 games
+ 11 assists in 10 AHL games.
Where as Mr Hughes already has 71 points in 87 career games...
- when Mr EK65 got 71 points in the NHL, he had about 150 games played in the NHL
and was 23 at the time...
Thou....i suppose...he was young Erik Karlsson, even at 23, so you are correct with that
and if you meant the defensive side of EK65,..he has always sucked lol
Actually, he isnt expected to play both sides of the ice. They are force feeding him easy minutes. His OZONE start is astronomical.Trade Hughes for Makar or Heiskanen, any of the 3 would fail in the current role he’s expected to play. He’s a 21 year old offensive defenceman whoa expected to play both sides of the ice because Vancouver only has one other good defender
I had to look it up.Actually, he isnt expected to play both sides of the ice. They are force feeding him easy minutes. His OZONE start is astronomical.