Value of: Is Max Pacioretty on his way out?

hockeyheadlines

Registered User
Oct 9, 2016
1,740
4
Canada
Not a fan of either team but how do you guys feel about a Patches for Tanev base for a trade? Gives MTL more depth at D especially when Markov slows down and gives Vancouver some scoring depth once the Sedin slow down. I was going to add Virtanen and Sergachev so both could swap wingers and D but Sergachev holds a little more value IMO.

Tanev is a RHD, we need a LHD.
 

TheNewEra

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
8,213
3,630
Tanev is a RHD, we need a LHD.

should go for a cheap stopgap imo because you guys dont need an all world defence with price in net

oduya/hamhuis (whoever is the lhd) should be the target

could get them for cheapish and those guys havent slowed down to the point where they are liabilities and either one of them are upgrades over at least one if not 2 of your dmen at the moment
 

bleuetbio

Registered luser
Nov 13, 2008
3,560
690
Montreal
Not a fan of either team but how do you guys feel about a Patches for Tanev base for a trade? Gives MTL more depth at D especially when Markov slows down and gives Vancouver some scoring depth once the Sedin slow down. I was going to add Virtanen and Sergachev so both could swap wingers and D but Sergachev holds a little more value IMO.

We need LD, not RD.... and for the record this is our needs

1- Offense-> a 60 pt forward with an element of speed
...
...
2- 1st line LD-> We have the RD and the goalie to patch a bit this problem

Trading a 60 pt forward for a LD would exposed badly our main need and this probably for many years. Forget the cup in the Price prime
 

jacks*

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
11,311
4
Not a fan of either team but how do you guys feel about a Patches for Tanev base for a trade? Gives MTL more depth at D especially when Markov slows down and gives Vancouver some scoring depth once the Sedin slow down. I was going to add Virtanen and Sergachev so both could swap wingers and D but Sergachev holds a little more value IMO.

No interest what so ever as a Habs fan.
 

jacks*

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
11,311
4
Lol Spurgeon plus, no way that would happen, wouldn't do Spurgeon straight up, it would be that Habs adding

Well pretty hard for the Bruins to refuse since Spurgeon doesn't play for them.
Also the Habs wouldn't adding to Patches for Spurgeon. Nice try though.
 

BBB24

Registered User
Aug 12, 2010
3,843
1,350
Saskatchewan
Well pretty hard for the Bruins to refuse since Spurgeon doesn't play for them.
Also the Habs wouldn't adding to Patches for Spurgeon. Nice try though.

Not sure where I mentioned anything about Spurgeon being on the Bruins, I know where he plays and again never going to happen especially thinking the Wild add.
 

PTH

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
416
0
Quebec City
Visit site
Fair enough. Just thought having Weber first pairing and Tanev second, would be scary for opponents.

Habs second pairing has Petry on the right side, and he's been doing fine. With Pateryn and Juulsen coming up, RD is set. LD is weak overall, with Emelin, Markov, Beaulieu and Barberio. Emelin is doing fine riding shotgun to Weber but is somewhat overpaid and lacks offense, Markov is doing awesome but isn't going to be in this league in 3 years, Beaulieu hasn't taken that next step and Barberio is looking like an OK 3d pairing guy, no more.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,014
18,221
Fair enough. Just thought having Weber first pairing and Tanev second, would be scary for opponents.

Tanev is the last thing we need. If we were trading Pacioretty in a deal based around a defenseman, it wouldn't be for a RH defensive defenceman with nothing to offer offensively. It would be for a LH PMD.
 

BatVader

"nothing is true; everything is permitted"
May 16, 2015
12,838
11,972
Imperial Gotham
as per; http://mynhltraderumors.com/nhl-rum...-ny-islanders-tampa-bay-lightning/2016/12/03/
Brendan Kelly of the Montreal Gazette: said:
The Montreal Canadiens are near the top of the standings, but some think they may not have the pieces in place to go all the way. They have a weakness down the middle. If GM Marc Bergevin thinks they have a shot this year, he needs to trade for a “A-list second line centre.”

Alex Galchenyuk has shown he can be a can be their No. 1 guy, but it’s a drop off after that. Neither Tomas Plekanec or David Desharnais are a No. 2 center on a Cup contending team.

Kelly thinks that Coyotes Martin Hanzal would be an interesting option for the Canadiens.

On the dream acquisition, what about John Tavares. There is talk that Islanders could put Tavares on the trade market. Kelly mentions Max Pacioretty plus another piece for Tavares.

Honestly, asking if there is any way that this could happen?
I am not in any way a fan of Hanzal and consider any move towards him a waste of assets, but JT would be a huge acquisition.
Just don't know who would fill Pacioretty's slot on the LW.
 

Avs44

Registered User
May 16, 2011
21,884
10,662
as per; http://mynhltraderumors.com/nhl-rum...-ny-islanders-tampa-bay-lightning/2016/12/03/


Honestly, asking if there is any way that this could happen?

No, of course not. The author makes it sound like that is educated speculation from Kelly, when in reality, here is Kelly's piece, and here is what Kelly said.

But why don’t we dream a little today? How about the notion of John Tavares in a Canadiens jersey? There is all kinds of media chatter that the New York Islanders star is potentially on the trading block given the Isles’ mediocre start and for some reason — most likely the invention of the Loafs-obsessed Toronto hockey media mob — the Maple Leafs are most frequently mentioned as a potential destination for Tavares.

But why not Montreal? Bergevin would have to give up something big to land a guy who scored over 30 goals in each of his last two seasons. So how about giving New York a guy who’s scored over 30 goals in four of his last five seasons?

Exactly. Max Pacioretty for Tavares, with presumably Montreal throwing in someone else to sweeten the deal. Patch is having a sad-sack season, but maybe what he needs is a change of scenery to kick him out of his funk. The one thing for sure is that it’s not clicking for him here and hasn’t for a while.

Just a thought and my latest attempt to make life easier for Bergevin.


That makes zero sense for the Islanders on so many levels. That author is 1) clearly ignorant about other teams, and 2) out to lunch.
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,124
70,782
Buffalo should be all over this . 1st and Nylander play with jack

Props to you that's a solid offer. If the Habs were out of the playoffs I'd easily do this, but we are currently at the top of the league and it really isn't worth it to set ANOTHER year back.
 

PTH

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
416
0
Quebec City
Visit site
Tanev is the last thing we need. If we were trading Pacioretty in a deal based around a defenseman, it wouldn't be for a RH defensive defenceman with nothing to offer offensively. It would be for a LH PMD.

Or, in a 2 for 2 type of deal, we'd go for a downgrade on offense for an upgrade on defense - as I suggested higher up, a winger and a D from Anaheim for Pacioretty and Beaulieu. Say Silfverberg and Fowler, for argument's sake.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,014
18,221
Or, in a 2 for 2 type of deal, we'd go for a downgrade on offense for an upgrade on defense - as I suggested higher up, a winger and a D from Anaheim for Pacioretty and Beaulieu. Say Silfverberg and Fowler, for argument's sake.

I've been saying too that Anaheim is our best trade partner. Question is, are they interested.
 

PTH

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
416
0
Quebec City
Visit site
I don't expect Pacioretty would be moved for anything other than a winger unless Radulov was already re-signed, otherwise the Habs depth on W would just be ridiculously thin.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,648
4,205
Da Big Apple
Something around Patches for Fowler?

I'd be concerned acquiring Patches, he had a really poor showing at the World Cup too. At first it was because he didn't care about the event, but his poor play continued into the season.

Aging goal scorer who doesn't drive possession. Not sure the trade value would be enough to let him go

No because who would take him AND offer something the Habs really need?

It takes two to tango, I don't see any team willing to make a trade the Habs would make that would involve him.

You don't trade Theodore for anything but an elite young forward. MTL has no need for RHD, nor do we need floaters.

MaxPax is not damaged goods, but he has lost his luster recently, and until he proves consistently over an adequate period of games he still has the mojo to both bring it and finish, his value has flattened and diminished.

He is worth more than Fowler, assuming both are at top of their games, which is not the case now.

Don't see a fit w/Rangers except as a 3rd team broker, unless it is a bigger deal where we could bribe you to take Staal's NMC, which I doubt
 

BatVader

"nothing is true; everything is permitted"
May 16, 2015
12,838
11,972
Imperial Gotham
No, of course not. The author makes it sound like that is educated speculation from Kelly, when in reality, here is Kelly's piece, and here is what Kelly said.




That makes zero sense for the Islanders on so many levels. That author is 1) clearly ignorant about other teams, and 2) out to lunch.

Ok. Thanks
 

anezthes

Registered User
Mar 20, 2014
4,766
3,148
Or, in a 2 for 2 type of deal, we'd go for a downgrade on offense for an upgrade on defense - as I suggested higher up, a winger and a D from Anaheim for Pacioretty and Beaulieu. Say Silfverberg and Fowler, for argument's sake.

"Not in your wildest dreams."

No from ANA.
 

m302291

Registered User
Jun 2, 2015
1,433
33
I see the islanders as good trade partners.

Something around Strome/Nelson/CDH for Max and Beau?

Patches would look great on JTs line.

And assuming he re-signs, he can help ease his teammates into Quebec province life.:sarcasm:



I'll leave....
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad