Video Nasty
Registered User
- Mar 12, 2017
- 5,936
- 10,460
That article reeks of BS.
It’s a video. Try watching it and studying the responses, because otherwise, your comment just looks like you’re leaping to take shots without doing your own analysis.
I’ll transcribe some of the highlights (omitting some of the umms):
Q: When something like that happens, how much of it is for you guys a good hard look in the mirror and understanding your guys responsibility and things being where they are?
A: Uh yeah, I mean obviously, our play hasn’t been good enough. I’m first on the list there. Our play needs to be better. It’s the reason that two good guys lost their jobs.
Q: With Jay, did the message get lost because (voice lowers, unintelligible)?
A: Not at all, not at all, not at all. I think—the room—he never lost the room (repeated a couple more times).
McDavid mentions he knows the narrative out there (presumably that he’s running the team and the ringleader of these decisions), but says “it couldn’t be further from the truth.”
You can either believe McDavid or not, but he’s stating pretty plainly that he’s first on the list of players not good enough, they lost their jobs due to the players not being good enough, with himself leading that list, and he claims Woodcroft never lost the locker room.
I think the only untrue thing he said, and I think anyone would out of diplomacy, is that no one saw it coming. If that’s enough to paint the whole session with the brush stroke of a liar, that’s up to you. If anything, he doesn’t seem thrilled about it.
Not sure what anyone else wants from McDavid. Put the blame on himself without whining about the injury we all know he’s dealing with and said the firings were due to them.
Seems like solid leadership to me.