A tying assist is ’clutch’.
Are you trying to argue that scoring in a blowout game is ‘clutch’ ? Like what is the argument here? He didn’t devalue the points, I’m pretty sure he still counted them.
Really? I saw multiple games where Crosby didn’t contribute much and the poster admitted such.
View attachment 895974
So basically there’s obviously not talking with you Since you lack any sort of reasoning and logic. You are following the same silly way or thinking where it’s Crosby does no wrong, all while McDavid can’t get it right.
He called those points “meaningless.” Are you refusing to acknowledge that or you just didn’t want to read that part? Pretty sure that’s “devaluing” buddy…
He also called McDavids point totals “compiling.” I’m sure you know the meaning of that word? Or should I spell that out for you?….is that not “devaluing” either?
He also mentioned how it’s easy to look at point totals and score points…but Crosby? He does all this…
Dancing through entire teams.
Scoring while falling.
The best backhand in hockey history
Edge work.
Pure power protecting the puck.
Use of his skates,
Hand eye batting pucks in and consistently incredible redirects.
No look passes.
Hockey IQ.
Undressing players and goalies.
Shooting it off goalie's masks.
Stealing pucks.
Winning battles on the boards.
Diving goal line saves.
Poke checks and picking pockets.
Using the boards and the back of the net.
The Michigan goal.
Winning key face offs.
Blocking key shots.
But no, not bias AT ALL. McDavid? Just a simple offensive first player who scores lots of points but doesn’t win. Crosby? He does it all…the game is more than scoring points and all Crosby does is win…so Crosby>McDavid.