Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 80,611
- 57,620
Crosby's weighed down by the weight of 3x Stanley Cups.
Why wasn't it Steckel's lane that Crosby interfered with?I don't know if Steckel did that intentionally or not, and I don't really care. But that was Crosby's lane, Steckel interfered with him. It doesn't matter if he was skating in a straight line or not, you can't just skate through a guy. But since you are a Caps fan, given the NHL's extremely lenient interpretation of that rule towards Wilson and OV, you may be unaware of this
The difference in McDavid's and Crosby's individual (not team) accolades is basically everything that HOFer Marty St Louis won.
2 Art Rosses, 1 Hart, 1 Pearson, 1 First Team All Star.
An entire HOFer worth of accolades...
So basically stamkos HAS to come with MSL if he’s going to compete with the scoring of today?MSL + Stamkos was one of the best duos this league has ever seen. Of course you have to mention Stamkos in the reasoning why MSL won an Art Ross. You really love obfuscating facts.
Facts are it happens far less in todays game.
So much context here needs to be addressed, it’s hilarious.At the end of the day, Hockey is a team sport. Any player who wins everything that McDavid won, inlcuding the Conn Smythe in a historic run, especially against a beatable team like the Cats, is going to be hit by the question, 'Well, if he was that great, why didn't he hoist the Cup?
Thing is, he is that great and there is no excuse.
Being that great and then vanishing when the team needs you the most, while being their Captain, is pretty damning. The Cats won because the greatest player playing right now didn't show up in the first three games, then showed up after that and would have helped reverse swept them but suddenly vanished again in Game 7 and the Cats hoisted the Cup. Yeah, I heard he was injured too, so were others but they find ways to pull through because the team means more than how they're feeling and the ones who could find a way, won.
The team followed Captain McDavid and he was vanishing. Imo if the Oilers want to win, keep McDavid but take the C and give it to someone who will walk in the fire and keep moving. That guy isn't him.
Difference being Crosbys career is all but over and McDavid is only hopefully half way home and it's this close..At the end people won't be comparing McDavid to Crosby.And yet both Crosby and McDavid will be two of the stronger 1st ballot hall of famers in the history of the league.
Here's an illustrative analogy. I just looked at the Forbes Billionaires list (just now). Elon is #1 with 250B, Bezos is #2 with 205B. So the difference is about 45 Billion USD.
$45B is a lot of money, by itself that's more money than the entire net worth of the #29 person on the list (who incidentally is an Italian guy named Ferrero, he owns Nutella and I'm assuming Ferrero Rocher, not sure about the second). So clearly Elon is in a different financial league than Jeff Bezos, no?
Except he's not. Both Elon and Bezos are rich as hell, who cares they're close enough to each other. And they can definitely eat as much Nutella as they want regardless of whether they own the company.
***
Similarly, both Crosby and McD are good as hell at hockey and dominated their peers at roughly the same level. McDavid isn't in his own tier of dominance above Sid just like Elon isn't in his own tier of financial dominance over Bezos. Especially because McD dried up when it mattered most in this last series.
Who cares they're close enough, that's how I see it. But imo placing the guy who hasn't won a full tier ahead of the other guy who has won (while played well when it mattered) isn't at all how I would choose to characterize things
Scoring has also steadily increased since McDavid has been in the leagueIf you don't f*** around with magically played games and just adjust for scoring levels. McDavid outscores Crosby by 199 points through their first 9 seasons. Getting 199 extra points of offense out of a guy over the same amount of time is most certainly a tier above...
At some point people have to acknowledge that the ability to actually play in games counts for more than pretending someone played those games.
Leadership, McDavid has made the entire league better.Scoring has also steadily increased since McDavid has been in the league
Difference being Crosbys career is all but over and McDavid is only hopefully half way home and it's this close..At the end people won't be comparing McDavid to Crosby.
Today I'll listen to arguments, but if your eyes don't see how much better McDavid is compared to the rest of the league , I might suggest an eye Dr.Sure, we'll see how McD does in the future, we won't really know until both their careers are finished.
But again, to me saying McD is currently in his own tier above historical Crosby (ie topic of the thread) is not even close to accurate in my opinion. He hasn't differentiated himself enough (at least not yet), especially given Sid won multiple cups and played well in all of those playoffs
Malkin wasnt "way better" Crosby had 15 goals (lead all players) and 31 points. Malkin was better, but hardly.Today I'll listen to arguments, but if your eyes don't see how much better McDavid is compared to the rest of the league , I might suggest an eye Dr.
Crosby also threw out a goose egg vs Boston in a sweep and didn't he get swept by the islanders ? Let's not make Crosby a unstoppable playoff god.. Malkin was way better in 09.
Because Crosby went mental early.I think people are underrating prime Crosby and what he did in low scoring league, playing with Dupuis and Kunitz. Like, I do think peak Crosby (2010-12014) is a better player.
Malkin wasnt "way better" Crosby had 15 goals (lead all players) and 31 points. Malkin was better, but hardly.
People aren’t underrating Crosby, they are overrating McDavidI think people are underrating prime Crosby and what he did in low scoring league, playing with Dupuis and Kunitz. Like, I do think peak Crosby (2010-12014) is a better player.
Malkin wasnt "way better" Crosby had 15 goals (lead all players) and 31 points. Malkin was better, but hardly.
That's three now that aren't paying attention. It's adjusted for league-wide scoring levels. And McDavid still outproduced Crosby by 199 over their first 9 seasons.Scoring has also steadily increased since McDavid has been in the league
$45B is a tier above. Several in fact. It's an entire twitter purchase...And yet both Crosby and McDavid will be two of the stronger 1st ballot hall of famers in the history of the league.
Here's an illustrative analogy. I just looked at the Forbes Billionaires list (just now). Elon is #1 with 250B, Bezos is #2 with 205B. So the difference is about 45 Billion USD.
$45B is a lot of money, by itself that's more money than the entire net worth of the #29 person on the list (who incidentally is an Italian guy named Ferrero, he owns Nutella and I'm assuming Ferrero Rocher, not sure about the second). So clearly Elon is in a different financial league than Jeff Bezos, no?
Except he's not. Both Elon and Bezos are rich as hell, who cares they're close enough to each other. And they can definitely eat as much Nutella as they want regardless of whether they own the company.
***
Similarly, both Crosby and McD are good as hell at hockey and dominated their peers at roughly the same level. McDavid isn't in his own tier of dominance above Sid just like Elon isn't in his own tier of financial dominance over Bezos. Especially because McD dried up when it mattered most in his only SCF appearance thus far.
Who cares they're close enough, that's how I see it, McDavid is imo an otherworldly talent as was Sid. But imo placing the guy who hasn't won a full tier ahead of the other guy who has won (who has also played well when it mattered unlike McDavid so far) isn't at all how I would choose to characterize things.
EDIT: Decided to include the Nutella guy
There's a lot about Connor McDavid that I would gladly say, but one of them would never be "overrated".People aren’t underrating Crosby, they are overrating McDavid
Almost every aspect would be outlandish, but to say he’s a tier above Crosby is very much overrating himThere's a lot about Connor McDavid that I would gladly say, but one of them would never be "overrated".
That's three now that aren't paying attention. It's adjusted for league-wide scoring levels. And McDavid still outproduced Crosby by 199 over their first 9 seasons.
There is a reason people are saying McDavid's in a tier above. It's because he is.
$45B is a tier above. Several in fact. It's an entire twitter purchase...
It's like saying, "They're all HOFers, they're all really good at that hockey so nothing really separates them..."
Do you have Mario Lemieux a tier above Guy LaFleur? Or Guy LaFleur a tier above Patrick Kane?Almost every aspect would be outlandish, but to say he’s a tier above Crosby is very much overrating him
Ah, okay. You got ridiculously hung up on the fact that I said were instead of had been. I finally see what you're digging in on.This was the comment that got us started on this whole 'intellectually dishonest' path.
Right. So hand-waving away any separation on the basis that they're "strong" 1st ballot HOFers. Define strong, please, as I get the sense it's tad bit dismissive at the higher end. Kind of like hand-waving away $45B as if it's an irrelevant amount of money....No, it's like saying "Crosby and McDavid will be two of the stronger 1st ballot hall of famers in the history of the league so who cares they're close enough" which is what I actually said.
Right. So hand-waving away any separation on the basis that they're "strong" 1st ballot HOFers. Define strong, please, as I get the sense it's tad bit dismissive at the higher end. Kind of like hand-waving away $45B as if it's an irrelevant amount of money....
He is one of the best players of all time, yes. What makes Crosby especially great is that he also suffered significant injuries but managed to string together one of the top 10 most impressive careers in all of history, regardless.Oh well in that case Eric Lindros is one of the greatest players of all time.
I understand what you're trying to say. I find it an entirely absurd position to take.How about I don't. Next time if you want to talk to someone I'd encourage you to do a better job of pretending to understand what they actually said.