GreatGonzo
Registered User
What’s wrong with that? Again, MAF is a proven goaltender in the playoffs. Why are you getting tickled over a factual statement? I made it perfectly clear what he meant…if you just want to believe what you want, go right ahead. It’s just silly.He said that he doubts the Pens win 3 Cups with Smith or Skinner in place of Fleury. That's giving Fleury too much credit for all 3 wins considering Fleury had zero impact on the 2016 win. He played a single game (and lost it). Pretty sure the Pens still win that Cup with Smith or Skinner playing Fleury's role.
That's the point. The poster made it sound like without Fleury's goaltending, the Pens don't win 3 Cups. That's factually incorrect.
So again, saying "nice try" ignores the fact that person is literally crediting the Pens having Fleury in nets instead of (insert random mediocre goalie) as the reason for 3 Cups. That's simply giving Fleury too much credit.
I mean, I quoted someone who said Crosby (and Ovechkin) are NOT generational. You asked me to point out where someone actually said that or if I made it up. I did exactly that. You moving the goal posts about what "tier" they're in is actually an example of YOU making a strawman argument because that wasn't what my original quote was about.
This is your thing. You're incapable of saying "my mistake, I didn't see that post", and instead just double down by moving the talking points to try and make t seem like the person was wrong all along.
Facts are, Crosby has ZERO cups without MAF and Murray. Murray was arguably a smythe fav in 2016.
They are generational….98% of the site would agree with you. So why are you getting upset over one lone and outlandish opinion?
that’s fine. Your takes have been rather lousy on most threads I see you in. Keep up the good work.