Toggle sidebar

Is Auston Matthews a "generational goal scorer"? A deep dive.

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
People are too willing to throw the word Generational around. Kid hasn't even scored 50 goals yet.

Yes he is a great player, a great goal scorer and I'm thrilled he is a leaf.

I could probably think of a half dozen players outside of the "generational" talents we normally talk about who were better scorers/offensive players than him.
 
Dekes For Days said:
People called Ovechkin generational after his rookie season, and it was pretty much unanimous after his ELC.
Click to expand...
I disagree. That seems like revisionist history to me. I've been watching the whole time and do not recall any kind of general acceptance of that notion until he was threatening Gretzky's record. Maybe a couple Russian guys did, or Caps fans but regardless, it's a foolish term to use at the beginning of someone's career anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImpartialNHLfan
BlueBaron said:
I disagree. That seems like revisionist history to me. I've been watching the whole time and do not recall any kind of general acceptance of that notion until he was threatening Gretzky's record. Maybe a couple Russian guys did, or Caps fans but regardless, it's a foolish term to use at the beginning of someone's career anyway.
Click to expand...

Yes it is foolish at the beginning of Matthews career also.
 
Kazparov said:
People are too willing to throw the word Generational around. Kid hasn't even scored 50 goals yet.

Yes he is a great player, a great goal scorer and I'm thrilled he is a leaf.

I could probably think of a half dozen players outside of the "generational" talents we normally talk about who were better scorers/offensive players than him.
Click to expand...
Were or are?
 
BlueBaron said:
I disagree. That seems like revisionist history to me. I've been watching the whole time and do not recall any kind of general acceptance of that notion until he was threatening Gretzky's record. Maybe a couple Russian guys did, or Caps fans but regardless, it's a foolish term to use at the beginning of someone's career anyway.
Click to expand...
I mean whether you saw it or not, it was happening everywhere, by people with no allegiances to Washington or Russia.

I don't really see what benefit there is to waiting 20 years to call something what it is, but everybody has a different meaning of the word so the word itself is now pretty useless anyway. Fact is we have the best goal scorer in the world, and the best goal scorer we have seen in a generation. That should be cherished and appreciated as it's happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MattySnipes
Dekes For Days said:
I mean whether you saw it or not, it was happening everywhere, by people with no allegiances to Washington or Russia.

I don't really see what benefit there is to waiting 20 years to call something what it is, but everybody has a different meaning of the word so the word itself is now pretty useless anyway. Fact is we have the best goal scorer in the world, and the best goal scorer we have seen in a generation. That should be cherished and appreciated as it's happening.
Click to expand...

Google doesn't really agree with your assessment of his status. Until recently it has not been a topic beyond his "generational personality" in 2015 so I think the disagreement is with how many people thought that. I'm sure some people always thought he was but it was a fringe opinion until the last couple years.

It's a bit odd you think being called "generational" somehow makes watching them play a better experience. It seems to me the only thing it does is make the fans of said player feel he is even more special so they can lord it over other fans, see Edmonton. It's essentially wanting to be ranked with the all time greats without playing the games. Kind of cheesy IMO.

Was Cam Neely generational? The answer is no but his points and goals per 60 were awesome, so why isn't he? Didn't play the games...
 
If we are saying "generational goal scorer", then the answer is clearly yes. Matthews will go down as the best pure goal scorer of his generation, much like Ovi before him. If we are talking about "generational overall player", then I would say no. Matthews is in a tier just below guys like Orr, Gretzky, Crosby and now McDavid. Matthews is a tier-1 superstar, just below generation player. He's in a tier with guys like Ovi, Malkin, Jagr, Messier, etc...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Auston Escobar, TDK88 and glue
BlueBaron said:
Google doesn't really agree with your assessment of his status.
Click to expand...
Really? Because google showed me a bunch of stuff from the early 2010s. People said it even earlier for Crosby and McDavid. And sometimes Malkin. And Lindros. Etc.
BlueBaron said:
It's a bit odd you think being called "generational" somehow makes watching them play better.
Click to expand...
It's a bit odd that you think calling something what it is while it's happening is "cheesy".
BlueBaron said:
It seems to me the only thing it does is make the fans of said player feel he is even more special so they can lord it over other fans, see Edmonton.
Click to expand...
No, we don't properly apply labels to things just to "lord it over opposing fans". :eyeroll:
BlueBaron said:
It's essentially wanting to be ranked with the all time greeats withoutplaying the games.
Click to expand...
No, it's a way of describing players, based on the games they have played, who are doing things that only all-time greats did.
 
Dekes For Days said:
Really? Because google showed me a bunch of stuff from the early 2010s. People said it even earlier for Crosby and McDavid. And sometimes Malkin. And Lindros. Etc.

It's a bit odd that you think calling something what it is while it's happening is "cheesy".

No, we don't properly apply labels to things just to "lord it over opposing fans". :eyeroll:

No, it's a way of describing players, based on the games they have played, who are doing things that only all-time greats did.
Click to expand...
So I guess you do think Cam Neely was generational.

Let's agree to disagree.
 
BlueBaron said:
So I guess you do think Cam Neely was generational.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what Cam Neely has to do with this, or why you're equating them.

We don't have TOI data from back then (so not sure why you're talking about his G/60), but after the first 4 years of Neely's career, he was tied for 105th in the league in goals per game.
 
BlueBaron said:
Google doesn't really agree with your assessment of his status. Until recently it has not been a topic beyond his "generational personality" in 2015 so I think the disagreement is with how many people thought that. I'm sure some people always thought he was but it was a fringe opinion until the last couple years.

It's a bit odd you think being called "generational" somehow makes watching them play a better experience. It seems to me the only thing it does is make the fans of said player feel he is even more special so they can lord it over other fans, see Edmonton. It's essentially wanting to be ranked with the all time greats without playing the games. Kind of cheesy IMO.

Was Cam Neely generational? The answer is no but his points and goals per 60 were awesome, so why isn't he? Didn't play the games...
Click to expand...

This is stupid. Orr was done at age 26 and would have been a generational talent if he had died at age 23. McDavid is already a generational talent. Just watch him play.
 
tmlms13 said:
In 2004 OV was not considered Generational, neither was Matthews. Would you trade OV for Sid in 2009? Or Matthews for McDavid now? The answer is no. It is not possible to be a Generational talent unless you are unanimously considered to be the best player in the NHL

There have been 5 Generational Talents at their draft year

LaFleur
Mario
Lindros
Sid
McDavid

Those are the only 5 names that should show up on discussion about Generational Talents.
Click to expand...
So Gretzky was not a generational talent?
 
Don't have much time to hang around here anymore but just wanted to bump this given Matthews' amazing year this year.

The signs pointing to him being an extremely special (i.e. "generational) goal scorer were there ~16 months ago. I'm glad he's proving he's very clearly in his own tier in terms of goal scoring ability vs anyone drafted in the past ~15 years.

I think this is just the beginning of multiple Rocket trophies and a crazy climb up the all-time goal list. Cheers peeps.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MattySnipes, Seath The Scaleless, saffronleaf and 1 other person
Ovie also was putting up an equal number of assists (i.e. 50+) for the first like 3rd of his career.

Honestly until Matthews wins a few rockets i don't think people will think of him in the same vein
 
  • Like
Reactions: Teeder Keon
Ziggdiezan said:
Ovie also was putting up an equal number of assists (i.e. 50+) for the first like 3rd of his career.

Honestly until Matthews wins a few rockets i don't think people will think of him in the same vein
Click to expand...
Your keeping it real here , but it’s so real
He’s incredible and this year on a different level , but way to early for comparisons like that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ziggdiezan
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom