Im gonna ask the question: Is Nashville elite now?
- Thread starter Ianturnedbull
- Start date
JPT
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2024
- 819
- 1,641
darth5
No!
As a lontgime Preds fan, I remain optomistic. They have some question marks in Novak (can he step it up?) and lower D pairs. I like Statsney a LOT. He looks very smooth. But injuries and bad puck luck could make them tread water at best. Proof is in the playing. Like most of our fanbase I feel it is time for them to be relevant.
I agree with this, especially Stastney. Novak was on a 52 point pace last season, which was just his 2nd full season. Evangelista though, IMHO will show the most growth this season up front
- Dec 12, 2017
- 25,022
- 11,698
FA signings seem to take a year or so to work out. They’ll be in a battle to make the playoffs, and if they do, they could win a round.
I'll say they'll be a possible wildcard team at best that might steal a round. Their biggest issue is that they're weak down the middle (relative to the real elite teams). O'Reilly is solid in both ends and a clutch playoff performer, but he's 33 this year and he plays a hard game. At this point in his career he's best suited for a 2nd line role. Does Nyquist play the middle or is he wing? Either way he doesn't have a proven track record as being anything more than an average 2nd liner, notwithstanding last season. Then who?
They are well-positioned on the wings no doubt, and perhaps Stamkos can fill in there for spurts if needed, but their defence looks pedestrian. After Josi and Skjei, who? Their PP looks to make a stark improvement, though.
They'll be a bubble 7-8 team and probably get put down quick unless Saros stands on his head (and against Edmonton/Vancouver/Colorado/Dallas that probably won't be enough). Who are they displacing in their division? Colorado? Dallas? Winnipeg? Seattle will be better, and they won't surpass the odd man out of Edmonton/Vancouver/LA/Vegas (well, maybe LA). To me they'll be one of those tweener teams who won't be good enough to compete for the cup but won't be bad enough to add high end pieces at the draft. They're in purgatory. If things don't go their way this season, they'll be stuck with this core for at least 2 more seasons following.
I'm not as optimistic about this bunch as others.
They are well-positioned on the wings no doubt, and perhaps Stamkos can fill in there for spurts if needed, but their defence looks pedestrian. After Josi and Skjei, who? Their PP looks to make a stark improvement, though.
They'll be a bubble 7-8 team and probably get put down quick unless Saros stands on his head (and against Edmonton/Vancouver/Colorado/Dallas that probably won't be enough). Who are they displacing in their division? Colorado? Dallas? Winnipeg? Seattle will be better, and they won't surpass the odd man out of Edmonton/Vancouver/LA/Vegas (well, maybe LA). To me they'll be one of those tweener teams who won't be good enough to compete for the cup but won't be bad enough to add high end pieces at the draft. They're in purgatory. If things don't go their way this season, they'll be stuck with this core for at least 2 more seasons following.
I'm not as optimistic about this bunch as others.
HFpapi
Registered User
Stamkos had 40g/81p last season. Marchessault had a career season (42g), Josi had his second best offensive season (85p) and ROR went from looking totally washed as an impact player in this league to once again looking like one of the top two-way forwards in the game.
I feel like you're kind of doing the opposite of only looking at the names and looking too much at age over last seasons production.
No doubt they have at best two seasons to get something done with those four aforementioned guys but for next season at least I think they are every bit as good on the ice as their names on paper suggest.
Ianturnedbull
Registered User
- Jun 11, 2022
- 6,018
- 5,423
Kcb12345
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2017
- 30,816
- 24,485
They'll be a playoff team for sure imo.
I think a lot depends on how much/if Stamkos and Marchessault's numbers go down away from Eichel/Kucherov. It'll impact Stamkos more for sure, but if Nyquist and the rest of the top line can play like they did this year they'll be a threat.
I think a lot depends on how much/if Stamkos and Marchessault's numbers go down away from Eichel/Kucherov. It'll impact Stamkos more for sure, but if Nyquist and the rest of the top line can play like they did this year they'll be a threat.
Imagine Brady Skjei and Roman Josi as your match up… I’d cry. So much sexy body and hart, that alone would overwhelm most forwards.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they win the presidents trophy and are a favourite for a cup… skjei is a favourite for the conn smythe ofc.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they win the presidents trophy and are a favourite for a cup… skjei is a favourite for the conn smythe ofc.
We're missing the playoffs with Saros, Josi, Forsberg and RoR? We made the playoffs last year, why would we miss this year?
SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 15,249
- 14,576
They have three 40 goal scorers, a top 5 starter and a top 3 dman in the NHL, so yes.
Not many other teams have all that. How many teams have three 40 goal scorers? Forsberg almost scored 50 this year.
Not many other teams have all that. How many teams have three 40 goal scorers? Forsberg almost scored 50 this year.
Is it? He's one of the best at the dot and shorthanded.
Forsbeeg just put up 48 goals why is it hard to believe he'll he'll have a good season?
DieSendungmitderMaus
Registered User
- Apr 14, 2018
- 1,137
- 1,610
We'll have to see how it comes together - but they have the potential to be. President's trophy is a possibility. Of course - a bubble/wildcard team is also possible
JPT
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2024
- 819
- 1,641
LightningStrikes
Champa Bay Lightning
- Nov 24, 2009
- 26,574
- 10,517
thegazelle
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2019
- 321
- 541
I'm still not used to seeing Stamkos' name on a jersey that doesn't have a lightning bolt on it, but as one of my favourite players, I will watch the Preds games with great interest.
I don't think I would classify this lineup as elite, primarily due to the age of some of the players. Maybe 5-7 years ago I would say so. BUT veteran players, when mated in a line up with other good players may develop good chemistry that will contribute to success. It remains to be seen how these guys will mesh together.
On paper though, purely because of their collective ages, I would put the Preds as a good team, but not great. Playoff bound, pretty certain of that.
I don't think I would classify this lineup as elite, primarily due to the age of some of the players. Maybe 5-7 years ago I would say so. BUT veteran players, when mated in a line up with other good players may develop good chemistry that will contribute to success. It remains to be seen how these guys will mesh together.
On paper though, purely because of their collective ages, I would put the Preds as a good team, but not great. Playoff bound, pretty certain of that.
Captain Mountain
Formerly Captain Wolverine
- Jun 6, 2010
- 21,130
- 15,266
They're a very good team with the goaltending to make serious noise in the playoffs.
They're also an old team - they're likely to have at least 5 of their top 6 forwards be 30+, as well as half their D-core (including their top 2 D).
There's a wide range of potential outcomes, from contender/near contender to missing the playoffs.
They're also an old team - they're likely to have at least 5 of their top 6 forwards be 30+, as well as half their D-core (including their top 2 D).
There's a wide range of potential outcomes, from contender/near contender to missing the playoffs.
Nashville is a huge threat to win a single game at home and lose in the first round 4 games to 1.
Might even go on an unsustainable POD bender and steal one on the road too.
Might even go on an unsustainable POD bender and steal one on the road too.
