aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 29,286
- 9,994
I would still take Tkachuk, so change that number to 32 .... but I would still be okay if they chose Zadina instead or Svechnikov, Dobson or Bouchard.
Popular Guy.
I would still take Tkachuk, so change that number to 32 .... but I would still be okay if they chose Zadina instead or Svechnikov, Dobson or Bouchard.
Popular Guy.
Do you know Wahlstrom's production with and without Hughes?
From what I have been reading my pick might be Bouchard.
We have a good track record drafting high quality D. I take Bouchard cause I'm a francophone but if we get a D I will be happy.
Zadina would be fine of course, nothing to scoff at.
What about Dobson ... said more like Brisson .. that could work. At least he played in the Q for Bathurst .. completely francaphone
I feel like I'm the only one who prefers Hughes to all other D in the draft.
Guys like Lazar have a well established pattern, so does Zadina. I took a snap shot of their draft years, because I am lazy, but these issues run deep. Lazar is a prime example, just look at his junior career as a whole. He also had one year in junior, his last, where he significantly closed the gap between goals and assist. So what? The pattern showed what he was.
Only once has Zadina had more assists than goals in like 6 years, playing at various tournament and the Czech junior league and it was by one 1 in 2014. He had some years where he ran even.
But in international play, best on best, he puts up numbers like 22 to 11 or 7 to 1.
Kraut is the guy we should be looking at the for 22nd pick.. He seems to do all the heavy lifting on those Czech teams.
There is something in those numbers that is unpalatable.
It leads me to believe he wont be this point a game dynamic player that he was being compared to, like Kucherov.
When I first dropped Cy Young thesis for draft eligibles, you seemed to doubt its credibility. How do you feel about now?
I like Hughes too.. I like Dobson more but would be very happy with Hughes and would have him next on my D list. @Lana Del Rey likes Hughes too.I feel like I'm the only one who prefers Hughes to all other D in the draft. (After Dahlin)
Not to sound flippant, but did you watch any of these international tournaments? If you're looking for an explanation to justify the discrepancy between goals and assists in his international career, or your "unheard" of Cy Young thesis (meant to sound a little flippant), then I would suggest it was because he carried those Czech teams on his back and played his role as a sniper perfectly in a short tournament format where goals are at a premium.
I'm sorry, but if Zadina's performance throughout his international career left you feeling concerned or uneasy, then you need to start watching a little more hockey instead of analyzing it's data. He clearly was a leader on those teams and showed that he was clutch when it mattered most. Either way, his performance in the Q this year should erase any fears that he is a one trick pony with nothing between the ears. It's a larger sample size and the #'s don't fit your narrative. It's crazy, he should be praised for that kind of production, especially considering he was adjusting to a new country/culture and playing on a smaller ice surface. Sheesh, tough crowd I tells ya!
Lazar had very good stats in junior but watching him play was another story alltogether. Stone hands and a bull in a China shop, I never believed he'd amount to much of anything after actually watching him.
Never trust people who attempt to craft narratives on projections for multiple players based only on stats.
that would be terrible for us. we would probably end up with Brady.Apparently Habs and Yotes talked about swapping picks.
I wonder if Yotes would want Tkachuk for marketing purposes. Doubt it.that would be terrible for us. we would probably end up with Brady.
I would be fine with Zadina if that is who they choose but I would prefer Tkachuk who I think is the kind of player you win with in the playoffs. Ottawa has a natural goal scorer in Hoffman & a number of people are ready to get rid of him. I also thought they drafted another natural goal scorer in Francois Perron out of the Q & most have given up on him. Tkachuk can do so many things well including play on the special teams & I doubt he will shy away from a rough game. Ottawa needs some playoff warriors.
If they decide on a defenceman I would hope it would be between Bouchard & Dobson but it could just as easily be one of the smaller Ds that they decide on which I'm not a fan of.
that would be terrible for us. we would probably end up with Brady.
I wonder if Yotes would want Tkachuk for marketing purposes. Doubt it.
that would be terrible for us. we would probably end up with Brady.
at this point, i'm 99% confident that Zadina will be available at 4 given Montreal picks at 3.To me it implies they don't have Zadina as their first choice, hopefully they fail to trade down and just take someone else at 3
at this point, i'm 99% confident that Zadina will be available at 4 given Montreal picks at 3.
ya it would suck to draft a big rhd with top pairing potentialonly thing that will suck more than Zadina going before us, is Ottawa taking Dobson and Zadina going to fifth.
Meh. I’d be happy with either Dobson or Zadina, but I don’t think Dobson is on our radar.only thing that will suck more than Zadina going before us, is Ottawa taking Dobson and Zadina going to fifth.
at this point, i'm 99% confident that Zadina will be available at 4 given Montreal picks at 3.
Why do you think Montreal would pass on Zadina?