If McDavid scores 150+ points this season...

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,372
5,930
That feel as good has the 2021 short season in many ways even better in some even if say the separation with number 5 -10 (59%-69% in 2021, 44%-54%) now

Regular volume of games being one obvious difference, regular game samples, but also RNH scoring 103 pts and showing up not so far from Kucherov have some Lemieux-Gretzky to it, when they could take high talent that would not have been necessarily a ppg player and push them at the top.

Also the Oilers at 4.00 goals per games when the closest top other teams are a 3.6 in 2021 the teams itself was not special offensively.

In some other ways (like even strength scoring) it does not look as impressive.

McDavid is #30 with Garland-Skinner in pts by 60 minutes at 5/5, he was #1 in 2021 with a significant separation.
Evp per games
2023:
Nathan MacKinnon
1.09
Connor McDavid
0.94
Erik Karlsson
0.92
Matthew Tkachuk
0.92
David Pastrnak
0.89
Elias Pettersson
0.86
Jack Hughes
0.86
Mikko Rantanen
0.83
Sidney Crosby
0.83
Jason Robertson
0.82

2021:
Connor McDavid
1.21
Auston Matthews
1.02
Artemi Panarin
0.95
Mitchell Marner
0.93
Leon Draisaitl
0.91
Nathan MacKinnon
0.83
Brad Marchand
0.83
Mark Scheifele
0.82
Max Pacioretty
0.81
Mikko Rantanen
0.81


I think it is a good reminder when talking about Lemieux, McDavid superior offence from the rest of the league with a good separation being from the powerplay this year does not feel particularly weak.

It would be one thing if it was coming from the powerplay on a team that the powerplay is not particularly better, but the oilers 32.5% is one of the best ever and completely alone in the nhl this year, i.e. McDavid-Drai added offense on the powerplay are net goals, a bit like 1996 Lemieux Pens when that teams was alone on its own in that category.

With all that said, despite a PDO at 1.0, over 80 games, McDavid teams with him on the ice outscored the opposition by just 13 goals at 5v5, +20 at even strength.

Matthews doubled the opposition in goals, +37, Tkachuk-Pastrnak-MacKinnon-Crosby, etc... had better result in that regard, the most common 4 skaters with him on the ice are Hyman, Nurse, Ceci, Draisaitl, that a 12.5+8.5+5.5+9.25+3.25, 39 millions of cap space unit, with 2 harts-art Ross winner that scored 275 pts this year and with that you outscore the opposition by one goal every 6 games, something does not feel 100% right, but I suspect in the playoff they will elevate again.

McDavid already before this year had put his name in the stone, and then he does that on top of it...
 
Last edited:

LightningStorm

Lightning/Mets/Vikings
Dec 19, 2008
3,264
2,286
Pacific NW, USA
I do consider McDavid to have the 4th best peak of any player. While people marvel at his insane speed, it's really the control of and skill with the puck while traveling at said speed that stands out in a huge way. This season has been so dominant that he's currently tied with the 21st century single season assist leader (19' Kucherov) and only a goal back of the season goals record in that span (08' Ovechkin) with 2 games to spare.
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,125
8,519
Regina, Saskatchewan
I'm not at all convinced that McDavid is peaking higher than Howe. Howe had greater separation to the closest non teammate Canadian in 1953 than McDavid does. That gives McDavid a fairly wide advantage, as he's being compared to Mackinnon in 6th in scoring rather than Richard in 3rd.

Howe had 40% more even strength scoring than any non teammate. McDavid might finish first still, but is behind Mackinnon in EVP/GP.

That's just offensively. The defense and physical gap is quite wide.

Going best 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year it is hard to argue McDavid peaking above Howe.

McDavid’s path into the top 4 is having the 5th highest peak ever while having an exceptional prime. It's his path to overtaking Lemieux. I don't think he does it, but he's at least got a chance.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,372
5,930
Howe had greater separation to the closest non teammate Canadian in 1953 than McDavid does. That gives McDavid a fairly wide advantage, as he's being compared to Mackinnon in 6th in scoring rather than Richard in 3rd.
In 2021 McDavid outscored Marchand by 52% using that metric too, which was quite close to 1953 Howe and that method assume a constant competition from Canadian, which could be fair (Richard is not bad obviously) but 1953 Canadian population and war, that would make that arguable that getting close to the exact same separation than Howe in today environnement is better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jigglysquishy

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,125
8,519
Regina, Saskatchewan
In 2021 McDavid outscored Marchand by 52% using that metric too, which was quite close to 1953 Howe and that method assume a constant competition from Canadian, which could be fair (Richard is not bad obviously) but 1953 Canadian population and war, that would make that arguable that getting close to the exact same separation than Howe in today environnement is better.
At face value I agree about his 2021 season. The point separation is insane, and he lapped the field at even strength. There was no Kane or Hyman. And RNH wasn't top 10 in points.

Obviously there are the caveats of the 56 games and no interdivisional play. Take that for what you will. I think it'll always have an asterisk and that history will remember 2023 as the stronger season.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,372
5,930
And RNH wasn't top 10 in points.
I feel this could be argued either way too, that one thing that arguably make 2023 more impressive, pushing RNH into the top 10, but that could be redundant with pushing the oilers over 30% on the pp, RNH isn't in the Top 45 at even strength.

Obviously there are the caveats of the 56 games and no interdivisional play
And Howe was in a 70 games, 6 teams era (in which he never played against Detroit like its non teammate competition did 20% of their games the best defence in the league, quite the advantage at least over all the non Habs and playing with Lindsay-Delvecchio seem a big plus over McDavid winger Drai aside and less part time than Drai would tend to be). Obviously the fact the he was main piece of a team leading the league in defense is the reason why most would put Howe peak ahead even if the scoring advantage could be argued to be nill.
 
Last edited:

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,479
9,643
McDavid. Punished for scoring short-handed points here as much as he is on the main boards. Smh.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,372
5,930
McDavid. Punished for scoring short-handed points here as much as he is on the main boards. Smh.
Not sure how that make sense, is 7 pts that specially high ? How does that hurt him ? They are pure + in his +/-, virtually pure net goal for his team and he get credit for having the best offense in the league and so on.
 

Matsun

Registered User
Aug 15, 2010
616
508
That's just offensively. The defense and physical gap is quite wide.
How do we know when McDavid has passed Howe as a defender though? I think modern players are weirdly hurt defensivly by selke voting and us being able to see their games. Crosby has been voted the most complete forward a bunch of times and been praised for 2 way play and grinding etc, so in the past he would probably have gotten a boost as a defensive forward. Now he doesn't because we know exactly how good he is defensively.

The same will happen to McDavid as he gets better on defense, since we know exactly how good he is I don't think he can surpass the old players that we don't know how good they were defensively.

Thats not to say I think Howe and McDavid are on the same level in defense and physicality, I've just been thinking about this.
 

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
19,843
16,760
Tokyo, Japan
Yes, there tend to be two extremes:

Extreme #1 -- The Main Board forum:
"Everything now is way better!"
"Everything before (insert year you started watching NHL) doesn't really count!"
"The 'O6' (nobody realizes the six-team league wasn't "original") was an all-Canadian league so it sucked!"
Etc.

Extreme #2 -- The History forum:
"No one can ever be greater than Howe / Orr / Gretzky / (Lemieux?)!"
"Things impressing now are trivial and fleeting and won't stand the test of time!"


(Needless to say, Extreme #1 is far more common the Main Board than Extreme #2 is here, but sometimes it does go both ways.)

Generally speaking, it'll all come out in the wash. Just wait and see.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,535
7,030
While he certainly is no Selke candidate yet, I would suggest McDavid is already starting to make that shift towards a strong defensive forward. His defensive metrics the past 3 seasons have all been above league average and I would personally argue a lot of his poor 2018-2020 defensive results were b/c his team's depth was nonexistent and he needed to cheat for offense for the Oilers to have any chance of winning. His defensive metrics during last playoffs when he was going all-out were even better and borderline Selke caliber, although obviously that cannot be sustained over a full season.
1681131638107.png

1681131763492.png
 

Matsun

Registered User
Aug 15, 2010
616
508
While he certainly is no Selke candidate yet, I would suggest McDavid is already starting to make that shift towards a strong defensive forward. His defensive metrics the past 3 seasons have all been above league average and I would personally argue a lot of his poor 2018-2020 defensive results were b/c his team's depth was nonexistent and he needed to cheat for offense for the Oilers to have any chance of winning. His defensive metrics during last playoffs when he was going all-out were even better and borderline Selke caliber, although obviously that cannot be sustained over a full season.
View attachment 685002
View attachment 685004
I wonder how his metrics will look with a full season of Ekholm? The Oilers seem to have improved alot since his arrival.
 

solidmotion

Registered User
Jun 5, 2012
625
318
I'm not at all convinced that McDavid is peaking higher than Howe. Howe had greater separation to the closest non teammate Canadian in 1953 than McDavid does. That gives McDavid a fairly wide advantage, as he's being compared to Mackinnon in 6th in scoring rather than Richard in 3rd.

Howe had 40% more even strength scoring than any non teammate. McDavid might finish first still, but is behind Mackinnon in EVP/GP.

That's just offensively. The defense and physical gap is quite wide.

Going best 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year it is hard to argue McDavid peaking above Howe.

McDavid’s path into the top 4 is having the 5th highest peak ever while having an exceptional prime. It's his path to overtaking Lemieux. I don't think he does it, but he's at least got a chance.
i think there's a case that howe's peak is slightly exaggerated by weak competition at the top in the early 50s. in a similar scoring environment in the mid to late 50s beliveau, moore, and bathgate all put up similar numbers. howe still clearly has the highest peak out of them but it's closer than it looks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Overrated

Matsun

Registered User
Aug 15, 2010
616
508
i think there's a case that howe's peak is slightly exaggerated by weak competition at the top in the early 50s. in a similar scoring environment in the mid to late 50s beliveau, moore, and bathgate all put up similar numbers. howe still clearly has the highest peak out of them but it's closer than it looks.
I agree with this, though at the same time both Mackinnon and Kucherov has missed alot of time these last seasons were they could've made McDavids numbers seem a bit less impressive. Mackinnon is on pace for 125+ over 82 games this season. If Draisaitl, Mackinnon and Kucherov all had 125+ point seasons then I think this new high scoring climate would be easier to see.

I don't see anyone except maybe Bedard having a shot at 150, but I think we will see 130 point seasons from a few soon.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,372
5,930
i think there's a case that howe's peak is slightly exaggerated by weak competition at the top in the early 50s. in a similar scoring environment in the mid to late 50s beliveau, moore, and bathgate all put up similar numbers. howe still clearly has the highest peak out of them but it's closer than it looks.
The amount of star forward season on a good enough team is so low, that it could be a better way to go, instead of looking what you did that particular year against the peers, what did you do against the best season of your peers in say the 5 season windows, 2 years before-2 years after.

That would bring to 60 something Canadian only star forward seasons on a good enough team instead of 12 something star forwards seasons. Forward that played 40% of their games against Detroit-Montreal and never against the Rangers feel like quite the downhill to climb versus those who played 20% of their games against the Rangers and just 20% of their game against those superteam.

In 52-53 the closest non Mtl-Det to Howe had 39 pts in 42 games (.93 ppg) against the rest of the league teams versus 20 in 28 games (.71 ppg) against the MTL-DET for a total of .84.

Boston best scorer (the highest non rangers-det-mtl one) had 17 goals, 11 assists, 28 pts in 39 games against the regular team (.72), 16 in 26 against the big one (.61).

Detroit scored 2.07 goal per games against MTL, 3.45 versus the rest of the league and I imagine it tended to be similar for MTL.

That dynamic increase Red Wings-MTL scorer over the rest of the league opposition and deepen their relative lead (bigger net at home has well in some case), the question being by how much and in Howe-Beliveau case, how much they were responsible for the Wings-Habs being particularly hard to score on has well.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,535
7,030
I agree with this, though at the same time both Mackinnon and Kucherov has missed alot of time these last seasons were they could've made McDavids numbers seem a bit less impressive. Mackinnon is on pace for 125+ over 82 games this season. If Draisaitl, Mackinnon and Kucherov all had 125+ point seasons then I think this new high scoring climate would be easier to see.

I don't see anyone except maybe Bedard having a shot at 150, but I think we will see 130 point seasons from a few soon.
A big part of this isn't even scoring climate related. The talent is just just way better. Probably the most talented era of forwards since the early 90s, compared to the relatively weak late 2000s/early 2010s and the positively shambolic DPE. I'm sorry but the 2000-2004 period's top scorer is Markus Naslund :biglaugh: . Mario Lemieux, after 3 years of retirement, no training, post cancer treatment, and with loads of injuries put up 76 in 43 in 2000-01 at age 35 and 91 in 67 in 2002-03 at age 37. If he can do that while clearly a shell of his former self then there's no excuse for in their prime elite forwards to not score 100 points. They just sucked too much. Crosby/Ovechkin/Malkin era is obviously more talented than the DPE but their competition is significantly weaker than the guys McDavid is competing with too. A healthy Crosby unironically lost a scoring race to Jamie Benn and John Tavares lmfao. Guys like Draisaitl/MacKinnon/Kucherov are clearing 100 points in the DPE with ease and collecting trophy after trophy for shits and giggles and probably collecting their fair share of hardware in the late 2000s/early 2010s as well, seeing as guys like the Sedins/Kane and *snicker* Jamie Benn were having their way with Crosby and co some of these years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Video Nasty

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,399
629
i think there's a case that howe's peak is slightly exaggerated by weak competition at the top in the early 50s. in a similar scoring environment in the mid to late 50s beliveau, moore, and bathgate all put up similar numbers. howe still clearly has the highest peak out of them but it's closer than it looks.
I put all McDavid's, Jagr's and Hasek's peaks above Howe's.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cole von cole

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,399
629
Crosby/Ovechkin/Malkin era is obviously more talented than the DPE
How is this possible? This is the top10 sorted by PPG between the two lockouts:
1681151444204.png


This is 05/06 --> last year without Connor
1681151471671.png


Not to mention the DPE featured all Hasek Roy Brodeur and Belfour. OK maybe like the last two years of DPE were lacking some talent as most of these guys got quite post prime by then but that's about it imo. The late 90s were way more skilled imo. I'd take prime Lindros over Crosby, Bure over Ovechkin and Forsberg over Malkin any day.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,372
5,930
How is this possible? This is the top10 sorted by PPG between the two lockouts:
DPE does not really start with the 1995, more around summer 1997, the Top 10 ppg leader of that era with at least 300 games (97-98 to 03-04)

Jagr, Forsberg, Sakic, Bure, Palffy, Demitra, Allison, Kariya, Lindros, Modano/Tkachuk

Bure-Forsberg-Palffy-Kariya-Lindros were all time talent, but had their health issue.



PlayerGPGAP+/-PIMP/GP
Jaromir Jagr
523​
271​
405​
676​
78​
328​
1.29​
Peter Forsberg
386​
143​
346​
489​
133​
408​
1.27​
Joe Sakic
500​
235​
347​
582​
125​
221​
1.16​
Pavel Bure
356​
234​
157​
391​
30​
204​
1.1​
Ziggy Palffy
443​
217​
260​
477​
77​
205​
1.08​
Pavol Demitra
486​
201​
289​
490​
99​
158​
1.01​
Jason Allison
381​
127​
257​
384​
46​
323​
1.01​
Eric Lindros
381​
163​
218​
381​
91​
676​
1​
Paul Kariya
459​
199​
260​
459​
19​
205​
1​
Mike Modano
520​
202​
309​
511​
107​
290​
0.98​
Keith Tkachuk
467​
235​
222​
457​
71​
841​
0.98​

About the current equivalent of the last 6 seasons (16-17 to today)


PlayerGPGAP+/-PIMP/GP
Connor McDavid
522​
287​
513​
800​
115​
201​
1.53​
Nikita Kucherov
431​
208​
370​
578​
76​
236​
1.34​
Leon Draisaitl
527​
284​
396​
680​
47​
206​
1.29​
Nathan MacKinnon
488​
222​
380​
602​
101​
226​
1.23​
Sidney Crosby
481​
212​
350​
562​
64​
231​
1.17​
Brad Marchand
491​
218​
351​
569​
151​
539​
1.16​
Artemi Panarin
508​
183​
398​
581​
129​
148​
1.14​
Steven Stamkos
432​
203​
290​
493​
60​
243​
1.14​
David Pastrnak
493​
275​
285​
560​
106​
225​
1.14​
Auston Matthews
479​
298​
243​
541​
108​
94​
1.13​
Evgeni Malkin
417​
175​
293​
468​
-5​
441​
1.12​
Patrick Kane
520​
200​
373​
573​
-45​
174​
1.1​
Mitchell Marner
505​
168​
385​
553​
87​
166​
1.1​

Matthews-Malkin are the #10-11 spot, Kane not making the list instead of Modano-Thachuk, at the #6-7 spot instead of Demitra-Allison we have Marchand-Panarin, always hard to compare era.

One possible way how good veteran did, how much they were push out of the league or not how well the young that did good in that era continued to do good in the next one (we will need to wait for this current crop).

If everyone was healthy without an history of injury, Lindros-Forsberg-Kariya-Selanne-Pallfy-Bure-Mogilny, Fedorov-Jagr always well motivated from start to beginning, Lemieux keeping up, the weaker second half of the dpe narrative for the top talent probably does not exist, but with how it played out I think we can entertain the idea.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,535
7,030
How is this possible? This is the top10 sorted by PPG between the two lockouts:
View attachment 685117

This is 05/06 --> last year without Connor
View attachment 685118

Not to mention the DPE featured all Hasek Roy Brodeur and Belfour. OK maybe like the last two years of DPE were lacking some talent as most of these guys got quite post prime by then but that's about it imo. The late 90s were way more skilled imo. I'd take prime Lindros over Crosby, Bure over Ovechkin and Forsberg over Malkin any day.
Lemieux was retired a good chunk of the DPE and when he did play he was often playing 20-40 games, Gretzky retired like 2 years after the DPE started. Lindros even when fully healthy was at best comparable to Crosby and we all know healthy Lindros barely existed. Bure over Ovechkin and Forsberg over Malkin are complete meme takes. Especially the Bure one. Only Jagr was a true DPE era mega star.

For the record I view Crosby/Ovechkin/Malkin as a relatively weak era for top forwards too, but at least there wasn't a 5 year period where the top scorer was Markus Naslund (not for a lack of Crosby trying to push Benn into that spot).
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,535
7,030
DPE does not really start with the 1995, more around summer 1997, the Top 10 ppg leader of that era with at least 300 games (97-98 to 03-04)

Jagr, Forsberg, Sakic, Bure, Palffy, Demitra, Allison, Kariya, Lindros, Modano/Tkachuk

Bure-Forsberg-Palffy-Kariya-Lindros were all time talent, but had their health issue.



PlayerGPGAP+/-PIMP/GP
Jaromir Jagr
523​
271​
405​
676​
78​
328​
1.29​
Peter Forsberg
386​
143​
346​
489​
133​
408​
1.27​
Joe Sakic
500​
235​
347​
582​
125​
221​
1.16​
Pavel Bure
356​
234​
157​
391​
30​
204​
1.1​
Ziggy Palffy
443​
217​
260​
477​
77​
205​
1.08​
Pavol Demitra
486​
201​
289​
490​
99​
158​
1.01​
Jason Allison
381​
127​
257​
384​
46​
323​
1.01​
Eric Lindros
381​
163​
218​
381​
91​
676​
1​
Paul Kariya
459​
199​
260​
459​
19​
205​
1​
Mike Modano
520​
202​
309​
511​
107​
290​
0.98​
Keith Tkachuk
467​
235​
222​
457​
71​
841​
0.98​

About the current equivalent of the last 6 seasons (16-17 to today)


PlayerGPGAP+/-PIMP/GP
Connor McDavid
522​
287​
513​
800​
115​
201​
1.53​
Nikita Kucherov
431​
208​
370​
578​
76​
236​
1.34​
Leon Draisaitl
527​
284​
396​
680​
47​
206​
1.29​
Nathan MacKinnon
488​
222​
380​
602​
101​
226​
1.23​
Sidney Crosby
481​
212​
350​
562​
64​
231​
1.17​
Brad Marchand
491​
218​
351​
569​
151​
539​
1.16​
Artemi Panarin
508​
183​
398​
581​
129​
148​
1.14​
Steven Stamkos
432​
203​
290​
493​
60​
243​
1.14​
David Pastrnak
493​
275​
285​
560​
106​
225​
1.14​
Auston Matthews
479​
298​
243​
541​
108​
94​
1.13​
Evgeni Malkin
417​
175​
293​
468​
-5​
441​
1.12​
Patrick Kane
520​
200​
373​
573​
-45​
174​
1.1​
Mitchell Marner
505​
168​
385​
553​
87​
166​
1.1​

Matthews-Malkin are the #10-11 spot, Kane not making the list instead of Modano-Thachuk, at the #6-7 spot instead of Demitra-Allison we have Marchand-Panarin, always hard to compare era.

One possible way how good veteran did, how much they were push out of the league or not how well the young that did good in that era continued to do good in the next one (we will need to wait for this current crop).

If everyone was healthy without an history of injury, Lindros-Forsberg-Kariya-Selanne-Pallfy-Bure-Mogilny, Fedorov-Jagr always well motivated from start to beginning, Lemieux keeping up, the weaker second half of the dpe narrative for the top talent probably does not exist, but with how it played out I think we can entertain the idea.
Man I knew DPE forwards were terrible but I did not realize Jason Allison of all players could somehow sneak into the top 10 lmfao. Injuries to players like Lindros/Forsberg, Jagr's mental boom in Washington, and Lemieux's pseudo-retirement definitely hurt the DPE's potential talent pool. Unfortunately these are all hypotheticals and the reality is guys like Naslund/Bertuzzi/Hejduk/Guerin were running around collecting hardware and accolades.
 

Overrated

Registered User
Jan 16, 2018
1,399
629
Lemieux was retired a good chunk of the DPE and when he did play he was often playing 20-40 games, Gretzky retired like 2 years after the DPE started. Lindros even when fully healthy was at best comparable to Crosby and we all know healthy Lindros barely existed. Bure over Ovechkin and Forsberg over Malkin are complete meme takes. Especially the Bure one. Only Jagr was a true DPE era mega star.

For the record I view Crosby/Ovechkin/Malkin as a relatively weak era for top forwards too, but at least there wasn't a 5 year period where the top scorer was Markus Naslund (not for a lack of Crosby trying to push Benn into that spot).
Complete? Forsberg is still rated ahead of Malkin in the top200 list on this site. Yeah Malkin hasn't retired yet but I specified them at their prime/peak and Forsberg suffers due to injuries.

Ovechkin has some of the best aging of all time at this point but I don't think it's too far fetched to take Bure's prime against Ovechkin's who is often underrated due to a shortened career and no cups. Ovechkin has benefited greatly from his team and guys like Bäckström setting him up with his easy tap ins. He underperformed both while in Russia and internationally compared to Malkin. Bure on the other hand would score unassisted goals all the time.

DPE does not really start with the 1995, more around summer 1997, the Top 10 ppg leader of that era with at least 300 games (97-98 to 03-04)

Jagr, Forsberg, Sakic, Bure, Palffy, Demitra, Allison, Kariya, Lindros, Modano/Tkachuk

Bure-Forsberg-Palffy-Kariya-Lindros were all time talent, but had their health issue.



PlayerGPGAP+/-PIMP/GP
Jaromir Jagr
523​
271​
405​
676​
78​
328​
1.29​
Peter Forsberg
386​
143​
346​
489​
133​
408​
1.27​
Joe Sakic
500​
235​
347​
582​
125​
221​
1.16​
Pavel Bure
356​
234​
157​
391​
30​
204​
1.1​
Ziggy Palffy
443​
217​
260​
477​
77​
205​
1.08​
Pavol Demitra
486​
201​
289​
490​
99​
158​
1.01​
Jason Allison
381​
127​
257​
384​
46​
323​
1.01​
Eric Lindros
381​
163​
218​
381​
91​
676​
1​
Paul Kariya
459​
199​
260​
459​
19​
205​
1​
Mike Modano
520​
202​
309​
511​
107​
290​
0.98​
Keith Tkachuk
467​
235​
222​
457​
71​
841​
0.98​

About the current equivalent of the last 6 seasons (16-17 to today)


PlayerGPGAP+/-PIMP/GP
Connor McDavid
522​
287​
513​
800​
115​
201​
1.53​
Nikita Kucherov
431​
208​
370​
578​
76​
236​
1.34​
Leon Draisaitl
527​
284​
396​
680​
47​
206​
1.29​
Nathan MacKinnon
488​
222​
380​
602​
101​
226​
1.23​
Sidney Crosby
481​
212​
350​
562​
64​
231​
1.17​
Brad Marchand
491​
218​
351​
569​
151​
539​
1.16​
Artemi Panarin
508​
183​
398​
581​
129​
148​
1.14​
Steven Stamkos
432​
203​
290​
493​
60​
243​
1.14​
David Pastrnak
493​
275​
285​
560​
106​
225​
1.14​
Auston Matthews
479​
298​
243​
541​
108​
94​
1.13​
Evgeni Malkin
417​
175​
293​
468​
-5​
441​
1.12​
Patrick Kane
520​
200​
373​
573​
-45​
174​
1.1​
Mitchell Marner
505​
168​
385​
553​
87​
166​
1.1​

Matthews-Malkin are the #10-11 spot, Kane not making the list instead of Modano-Thachuk, at the #6-7 spot instead of Demitra-Allison we have Marchand-Panarin, always hard to compare era.

One possible way how good veteran did, how much they were push out of the league or not how well the young that did good in that era continued to do good in the next one (we will need to wait for this current crop).

If everyone was healthy without an history of injury, Lindros-Forsberg-Kariya-Selanne-Pallfy-Bure-Mogilny, Fedorov-Jagr always well motivated from start to beginning, Lemieux keeping up, the weaker second half of the dpe narrative for the top talent probably does not exist, but with how it played out I think we can entertain the idea.
I guess it depends on the definition. Didn't the metagame start shifting already after 94/95? Especially given the Devils' cup win that year? That could easily be considered the start of the era.

Sure many of the guys had injuries and other problems but that's besides the point. It was some of the most stacked period in terms of talent which didn't stop at the top. I bet the average 3rd liner back then was more talented than now.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,535
7,030
Complete? Forsberg is still rated ahead of Malkin in the top200 list on this site. Yeah Malkin hasn't retired yet but I specified them at their prime/peak and Forsberg suffers due to injuries.

Ovechkin has some of the best aging of all time at this point but I don't think it's too far fetched to take Bure's prime against Ovechkin's who is often underrated due to a shortened career and no cups. Ovechkin has benefited greatly from his team and guys like Bäckström setting him up with his easy tap ins. He underperformed both while in Russia and internationally compared to Malkin. Bure on the other hand would score unassisted goals all the time.
This site's top 200 list comically overrates DPE era players b/c of shit like VSX/hardware/AS selections when in reality most of these guys wouldn't touch a single accolade in most other eras. I'm sorry but a 3rd place scoring finish in 1989 is objectively more impressive than an Art Ross trophy in 2002 (apologies to Iginla, but he's never getting one of those in any other era). Not talking about Forsberg specifically, but seriously look at some of these players in the scoring races:

Markus Naslund led an entire half decade in points. John LeClair has FIVE year end All Star selections. And that's before we get into the full meme tier with guys like Elias/Bertuzzi/Hejduk/Guerin getting into year end AS. Ron Francis and Adam Oates at age 38/39 were still finishing top 10 in DPE scoring b/c the competition was just that easy, meanwhile Francis struggled to finish top 10 even in his mid to late 20s back when forwards were actually good.

Forsberg may have lost some of his prime years to injury but we can play the hypotheticals game and give Crosby his 2010-13 period full health and Malkin his 2012-2017 period and Lindros/Forsberg get gapped anyway. Pavel Bure only led the NHL in goals 3x against the freest competition in NHL history (seriously, Milan Hejduk and Rick Nash have Rocket Richard trophies lol), whereas Ovechkin has led the NHL in goals 9x, while collecting even better trophies in an Art Ross and 3x Hart.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,372
5,930
I guess it depends on the definition. Didn't the metagame start shifting already after 94/95?
There was a long thread about it, was it when the Penguins lost to the Panthers, Montreal-Devils winning the cup, it is not a binary on-off and a transition that occur between 94-95 to 97-98, with only the consensus that at the latest for sure it was going on by 97-98 and that 96-97 still had sign of higher scoring.

212001-02NHL12302.620.654.1315.7784.2327.525.0.9082.51
222000-01NHL12302.760.764.5916.6483.3627.625.0.9032.65
231999-00NHL11482.750.654.0316.1583.8527.925.2.9042.64
241998-99NHL11072.630.694.3815.8184.1927.825.2.9082.56
251997-98NHL10662.640.704.6415.0884.9227.324.7.9062.53
261996-97NHL10662.920.674.1016.2783.7329.726.9.9052.80
271995-96NHL10663.140.905.0417.9382.0730.227.1.8983.04
281994-95NHL6242.990.774.3617.7382.2729.326.4.9012.89
291993-94NHL10923.240.904.8518.6481.3630.227.1.8953.14
301992-93NHL10083.631.035.2819.5780.4330.927.4.8853.53
311991-92NHL8803.480.975.0219.2480.7630.427.0.8883.37
321990-91NHL8403.460.894.5719.4480.5629.726.4.8863.35

Something happen in 94-95 , so it is not out of place to suggest it, but Lemieux comeback, explosion of powerplay in 95-96 bring things to normal high scoring again for a little while.

97-98 is the big drop to lower than usual scoring, that would stay until 05-06
 
  • Like
Reactions: Overrated

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad