If Draisaitl refuses to sign an extension this summer, Should the Oilers trade him or ride it out and go All IN one more time.

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

CashMash

Registered User
Jun 5, 2015
3,231
754
Finland
Tough choice. My heart says to go all in since they were SO CLOSE this year.

And yet...

This last round seems to suggest they're in trouble when their two gamebreakers struggle. They can't cover up the deficiencies and have seemed outmatched for long stretches. When Crosby didn't score, at least Malkin did.

It completely depends on what is available, honestly. If you get a replacement top-6 center and a proven goalie, go for it. Otherwise, I would just stay put. The oilers NEED a good goalie, though... Saros? Ullmark? Someone like that.

EDIT:

It doesn't even have to be an elite goalie. Just someone nice and stable.
 

Section 104

Registered User
Sep 12, 2021
716
756
I think you trade him. You can’t allow to happen what the Islanders let happen to John Tavares (who dropped a lot of hints that he wanted to stay on the island but didn’t).
 

Hockeyholic

Registered User
Apr 20, 2017
16,880
10,558
Condo My Dad Bought Me
No, but there's this though.



Which kinda takes the conversation in the other direction of how Edmonton allocate their cap when Bouchard, McDavid and Draisaitl eat 40% of the salary cap.

Almost sounds like his opinion without a source.

But 40% cap tied up in three players will make it tough to keep other players
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,041
14,846
No, but there's this though.



Which kinda takes the conversation in the other direction of how Edmonton allocate their cap when Bouchard, McDavid and Draisaitl eat 40% of the salary cap.

Can these contract talks start before July 1, or can the two sides talk now and only the actually signing can occur July 1.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
24,981
42,639
colorado
Visit site
The return would never be enough. Ride it out and move on, use the cap space then. Drai likely won’t sign with whoever trades for him, nor should he. He’s a rental.
 

613Leafer

Registered User
May 26, 2008
13,012
3,940
Trade him.

They would get some very good pieces, and could still be competitive next year. If they are competitive, it might entice McDavid to stay. If Draisaitl walks for nothing, McDavid is leaving (ie "all in" virtually guarantees losing both of them).

If they trade Draisaitl, and it's clear McDavid also wants to leave a year from now, then they can trade him too.

Gives them a shot next year, and either way, helps them longterm either via Draisaitl's trade return + McDavid locked up, or Draisaitl + McDavid's combined trade returns.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,386
21,263
MN
It really depends on what the offer is for Draisaitl, and how EDM is doing next year.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,041
14,846
Trade him.

They would get some very good pieces, and could still be competitive next year. If they are competitive, it might entice McDavid to stay. If Draisaitl walks for nothing, McDavid is leaving (ie "all in" virtually guarantees losing both of them).

If they trade Draisaitl, and it's clear McDavid also wants to leave a year from now, then they can trade him too.

Gives them a shot next year, and either way, helps them longterm either via Draisaitl's trade return + McDavid locked up, or Draisaitl + McDavid's combined trade returns.
If the Oilers traded Draisatl then McDavid would very likely not want to stay. So he’d be traded too. And that means a year it down rebuild. The Oilers aren’t heading down that road so Drsisatl will get a huge extension. 13.5 x 8 enough?
 

Devilsfan118

Sing us a song, you're the Schiano man
Jun 11, 2010
3,226
2,827
NJ
No, but there's this though.



Which kinda takes the conversation in the other direction of how Edmonton allocate their cap when Bouchard, McDavid and Draisaitl eat 40% of the salary cap.

Add Nurse in and we've got a new "core 4" to obsess over!
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

The Hanging Jowl

Registered User
Apr 2, 2017
10,526
11,815
Florida obviously learned some lessons and look posed to win a Cup. No reason Edmonton can't be next. You tweak but keep the core together. Draisaitl is a top 5 forward in the league, I wouldn't give up on that when if I have a team that made it to the finals.
 
Last edited:

AvroArrow

Mitch "The God" Marner
Jun 10, 2011
18,819
19,970
Toronto
I like this prop for edmonton. Maybe not great for boston? This would fill 2 huge holes that the oilers have
Boston would fill their hole at 1C, they run Draisaitl + Pasta for the next 7-8 years maybe longer. Gotta give to get, they still have Swayman in net, and even though Nurse is overpaid he's not as horrible as people are making him out to be. His problem is, he's not worth 9m, but I genuinely don't think he's a bad player. At 6M you don't mind him, so you take on a bad contract (cap expected to rise) but he's still a serviceable player + you get one of the best players in the world, who I think immediately fits in Boston.

Just my take on it. Edmonton gets their G for the next 4-5 years + a stud on the blue line, Boston gets their 1C
 
  • Like
Reactions: hurdemz

Roksta

Registered User
Jul 27, 2011
1,115
1,598
With their road to the finals plus the fashion they lost in. I would have a hard time saying no shame. They were pretty well gifted a SCF appearance. Toss away first round. Key injuries to the next two opponents and completely folded in the finals.

Of course you would, you're a Toronto fan with extreme bias

If you want to talk about shame look at your stupid team
 

hurdemz

Tub thumpin'
Jul 15, 2022
626
999
Ssm, ON
Boston would fill their hole at 1C, they run Draisaitl + Pasta for the next 7-8 years maybe longer. Gotta give to get, they still have Swayman in net, and even though Nurse is overpaid he's not as horrible as people are making him out to be. His problem is, he's not worth 9m, but I genuinely don't think he's a bad player. At 6M you don't mind him, so you take on a bad contract (cap expected to rise) but he's still a serviceable player + you get one of the best players in the world, who I think immediately fits in Boston.

Just my take on it. Edmonton gets their G for the next 4-5 years + a stud on the blue line, Boston gets their 1C
Agree with this. This helps both teams get better and fill weaknesses
 

Sasha Orlov

Lord of the Manor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2018
8,281
19,354
Boston would fill their hole at 1C, they run Draisaitl + Pasta for the next 7-8 years maybe longer. Gotta give to get, they still have Swayman in net, and even though Nurse is overpaid he's not as horrible as people are making him out to be. His problem is, he's not worth 9m, but I genuinely don't think he's a bad player. At 6M you don't mind him, so you take on a bad contract (cap expected to rise) but he's still a serviceable player + you get one of the best players in the world, who I think immediately fits in Boston.

Just my take on it. Edmonton gets their G for the next 4-5 years + a stud on the blue line, Boston gets their 1C
Literally the only thing I can come up with wrong with your proposal is that Boston might be confident they could get him for free as a UFA

Otherwise it’s a trade that makes both teams better imo
 

GOilers88

#FreeMoustacheRides
Dec 24, 2016
14,945
22,340
Buyers remorse will come out for whatever team takes him away from McDavid. There is a reason he doesn’t produce to the same level while away from him.
Are there any players who wouldn't produce less playing away from McDavid than with him?

With their road to the finals plus the fashion they lost in. I would have a hard time saying no shame. They were pretty well gifted a SCF appearance. Toss away first round. Key injuries to the next two opponents and completely folded in the finals.
Your brain must be exhausted.
 

Cursed Lemon

Registered Bruiser
Nov 10, 2011
11,451
5,995
Dey-Twah, MI
All I'm saying is

1718474526557.png
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad