Sundinisagod
****
Arizona isn't trading a cost controlled superstar for a superstar who will cost around 15m per.
Arizona isn't trading a cost controlled superstar for a superstar who will cost around 15m per.
in your opinion, how much of this is driven by the A) (lack of) interest in hockey within the Arizona market versus B) fielding an absolutely abysmal team with no success or star power for the past decade?
Leafs are not trading a guaranteed generational superstar for a potential franchise superstar unless Matty demands to go to Arizona, signs an 8 year extension and Arizona adds. IMO he will come in closer to $13m AAV.
Leafs are not trading a guaranteed generational superstar for a potential franchise superstar unless Matty demands to go to Arizona, signs an 8 year extension and Arizona adds. IMO he will come in closer to $13m AAV.
When Matthews was negotiating his current contract, his price on a 8 year deal was rumored to be 13.6 million if I recall correctly. I believe that to be true, because if it was much less, the Leafs would have given him the 8 year deal. After everything he's accomplished since then, you'd have to give him a raise not a pay cut on a 8 year deal.
You make perfect sense. On one hand I would say, but that was before COVID but on the other, it is Matty so Leafs would most likely be happy to pay him $13.6mx8.
Don't forget the cap is expected to start rising significantly after year 1 of Matthews new deal. They will need factor that into the contract...or was it at the beginning of his new deal? This makes me worried that the Matthews camp may wish to hold off signing a deal til he reaches Ufa status...unless the Leafs are ready to generously account for that cap increase well before it happens.
Why cant it be about money? If Zona told him that they intend to offer league max on an extension, who wouldn't do that?It's absolutely far fetched. Why would Matthews go along with this? It can't be money.
With salary and endorsements it's hard to see him making more money anywhere but here.Why cant it be about money? If Zona told him that they intend to offer league max on an extension, who wouldn't do that?
with the cap up 1MM next year and potentially 3MM next year, maximum salary for a player would be 17.3mm.With salary and endorsements it's hard to see him making more money anywhere but here.
well, Matthews isn't generational outside of maybe goal-scoring.Leafs are not trading a guaranteed generational superstar for a potential franchise superstar unless Matty demands to go to Arizona, signs an 8 year extension and Arizona adds. IMO he will come in closer to $13m AAV.
well, Matthews isn't generational outside of maybe goal-scoring.
He's had 1 generational-type year (2022), and another where he was a generational goal scorer (2021) and he ended those years as a hart finalist/winner. However, his 2017-2020 and 2023 seasons are not that of a generation player but rather a franchise-level one. He's not a Mcdavid/Crosby/Ovechkin level player, while Bedard is expected to be at that level.
Endorsements there wouldn't be anywhere close to here plus he can sign 8 years here.with the cap up 1MM next year and potentially 3MM next year, maximum salary for a player would be 17.3mm.
He already owns a mansion there so its hard to imagine him netting more in Ontario
What if Matthews absolutely refuses to resign in Toronto and says he is going home back to the US. Kawhi did it to the Raptors after winning the NBA Championship!The ultimate Hfboards nonsense. Reigning MVP + Rocket winner for a prospect.
Insane.
well, Matthews isn't generational outside of maybe goal-scoring.
He's had 1 generational-type year (2022), and another where he was a generational goal scorer (2021) and he ended those years as a hart finalist/winner. However, his 2017-2020 and 2023 seasons are not that of a generation player but rather a franchise-level one. He's not a Mcdavid/Crosby/Ovechkin level player, while Bedard is expected to be at that level.
If traded there in the off season, he could sign for 8 years.Endorsements there wouldn't be anywhere close to here plus he can sign 8 years here.
True I suppose.If traded there in the off season, he could sign for 8 years.
that still didn't make him a generational player. Those rookie wingers did include Nylander who was a very highly developed prospect and is around a ppg winger outside of 2019 since his ELC endedDude he came 2nd in goals playing 17 minutes a game and 2 minutes on the powerplay as a 19 year old rookie center playing with nothing but rookie wingers all season.
that still didn't make him a generational player. Those rookie wingers did include Nylander who was a very highly developed prospect and is around a ppg winger outside of 2019 since his ELC ended
He came 20th in pts and lower in ppg as a rookie. In his next few years, he wasn't a top 5 player either.
A guy like Mcdavid was a top 3-5 player since his rookie season. The same was the case for Crosby, OV, Lemieux, and Gretzky.
Matthews was elite but a level or two below that. He's a Yzerman/Sakic/Malkin (healthy) level player if he keeps this up.
Crosby/OV are both a tier above, and then I have Mcdavid/Lemiuex/Gretzky/Howe in tier 1
I think Bedard is slotting a tier above Matthews as a prospect as well, but we'll see at the NHL level.
Mcdavid is about to win his 5th ross this year. He's having one of the most dominant seasons ever after a top-10 all-time playoff run last year.He played with Hyman and Brown for atleast half of that season and Nylander wasn't close to as good in his rookie season as he's become. The fact that you have McDavid in a tier with Lemieux and Gretzky and not Crosby and Ovechkin really says it all though lol
Mcdavid is about to win his 5th ross this year. He's having one of the most dominant seasons ever after a top-10 all-time playoff run last year.
I'm past the point where I need to pretend Crosby (my favorite of the three) and OV are as good as him.
He's got only 2 comparables who dominated the league in terms of offensive output to the extent he has and as long and consistent as he has, and those are 99 and 66
5 Rosses + 4 Lindsays + 3 Harts + 1 Rocket at the age of 26 by year-end is GOAT-level dominance.
Being a generational goal scorer I kind of think makes you a generalational player.that still didn't make him a generational player. Those rookie wingers did include Nylander who was a very highly developed prospect and is around a ppg winger outside of 2019 since his ELC ended
He came 20th in pts and lower in ppg as a rookie. In his next few years, he wasn't a top 5 player either.
A guy like Mcdavid was a top 3-5 player since his rookie season. The same was the case for Crosby, OV, Lemieux, and Gretzky.
Matthews was elite but a level or two below that. He's a Yzerman/Sakic/Malkin (healthy) level player if he keeps this up.
Crosby/OV are both a tier above, and then I have Mcdavid/Lemiuex/Gretzky/Howe in tier 1
I think Bedard is slotting a tier above Matthews as a prospect as well, but we'll see at the NHL level.
Mcdavid has been top 3 in ppg since his rookie season I believe.Yet his stats up to the same point are far more comparable to Crosby than Gretzky and Lemieux on a relative basis. Like, by far. I'm talking tiers here like you mentioned, not who was strictly better. Yes McDavid is better offensively than Crosby and Ovechkin, but the difference is not nearly as much as the raw numbers indicate due to the recent scoring increase. I mean a simple look at his stats vs. everyone else in the NHL compared to Crosby, Ovechkin, Lemieux and Gretzky paint a pretty obvious picture.
13m I would be shocked as that’s not much of a raise and he will want every penny he can squeeze out of the Leafs. Dubas has zero leverage with the no trade clauseLeafs are not trading a guaranteed generational superstar for a potential franchise superstar unless Matty demands to go to Arizona, signs an 8 year extension and Arizona adds. IMO he will come in closer to $13m AAV.