Legend123
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2016
- 9,995
- 5,243
Source??Hutson is 5'8.25" 158 lbs
Cooley is 5'10.5" 180 lbs
Bu measured him at 5.9
Source??Hutson is 5'8.25" 158 lbs
Cooley is 5'10.5" 180 lbs
I stated a fact too.I stated a current fact and asked for fans to discuss. Complete good faith discussion. If you don't like the discussion, you are free to ignore.
Cheers!
Lol the teams don’t actually take those measurements, the players submit those and post them. He could have put whatever he wanted and they would’ve posted it. Source: myself I played NCAA hockey.Source??
Bu measured him at 5.9
Yes but is Casey really 5-9 1/2 tall or is he truly 5-9 15/32 tall? When is the last time you personally measured him and can we even trust your ability to read a tape measure?Huh, Seamus Casey has the same amount of points as Hutson though he has played two games more then Hutson.
Guess that means
Hutson > Casey > Cooley
Man the Devils have three Elite 1st pairing defencemen prospects in L.Hughes, Nemec, and Casey!
Thanks for opening my eyes OP!![]()
If that is how you prefer to view it. I never said Hutson was better than Cooley. Interesting that is what everyone believes the point of the thread was.Huh, Seamus Casey has the same amount of points as Hutson though he has played two games more then Hutson.
Guess that means
Hutson > Casey > Cooley
Man the Devils have three Elite 1st pairing defencemen prospects in L.Hughes, Nemec, and Casey!
Thanks for opening my eyes OP!![]()
Nope we just see through your bullshit. Painfully obvious you are trying to hype Hutson up as if there isn’t already a thread for him going strong which you contribute to already. Zero reason this would need to be a completely different discussion otherwise.If that is how you prefer to view it. I never said Hutson was better than Cooley. Interesting that is what everyone believes the point of the thread was.
This has become an interesting social experiment where posters tend to ascribe a certain viewpoint upon someone, who has done nothing more that state a stat and asked people to discuss.
Added a poll for ya! Maybe that makes for more of a discussion that it can stay out of the Hutson thread. Less thinking and stuff on my part.Nope we just see through your bullshit. Painfully obvious you are trying to hype Hutson up as if there isn’t already a thread for him going strong which you contribute to already. Zero reason this would need to be a completely different discussion otherwise.
Nothing says “I’ve got nothing to actually say here” more than turning to the “I’m such an intellectual thinker” routine on a hockey message board.
Exactly, you didn't say anything thus its up to everyone else to speculate to what your point is, pretty basic stuff.If that is how you prefer to view it. I never said Hutson was better than Cooley. Interesting that is what everyone believes the point of the thread was.
This has become an interesting social experiment where posters tend to ascribe a certain viewpoint upon someone, who has done nothing more that state a stat and asked people to discuss.
I straight up exposed the guy for the intention of this thread and hes still trying to play innocentExactly, you didn't say anything thus its up to everyone else to speculate to what your point is, pretty basic stuff.
Acting like an innocent doe on this forum doesn't work, Everyone has an angle.
Your poll is literally just two names. Am I suppose to pick what name I like better?Added a poll for ya! Maybe that makes for more of a discussion that it can stay out of the Hutson thread. Less thinking and stuff on my part.
yesYour poll is literally just two names. Am I suppose to pick what name I like better?
btw he was also measured by the Habs at 5.9Lol the teams don’t actually take those measurements, the players submit those and post them. He could have put whatever he wanted and they would’ve posted it. Source: myself I played NCAA hockey.
Those numbers are from the combine. Is it possible he grew .75 inches in 4-5 months? Sure, but unlikely. And also next to zero % that Cooley shrunk a half inch in 4-5 months.
I think the point is Hutson is on pace to set have the best D+1 NCAA season for a defenseman in the past 25 years over notable recent prospects like Fox, Makar, Quinn Hughes, Luke Hughes, Power, etc.There was never a doubt Hutson would dominate college hockey. This is not a surprise. The question is whether he can play in the NHL at his size. Not threadworthy.
The only measurements that you should should quote are from the combine. It is the only outlet with nobody’s interests in mind. NHL teams do not measure at prospect development campbtw he was also measured by the Habs at 5.9
Thev habs measured him at their own combineThe only measurements that you should should quote are from the combine. It is the only outlet with nobody’s interests in mind. NHL teams do not measure at prospect development camp
The physicals don’t correlate what is posted on the roster. I always said I was 185 when in reality I never even touched 180 in my life.You're required to have your physicals done in the pre-season for NCAA sports
been that way FOREVER
if his team page says he is 5'10........ he's 5'10
The physicals don’t correlate what is posted on the roster. I always said I was 185 when in reality I never even touched 180 in my life.
its not as much of a deterrent if a forward is small.Hutson is 5'8.25" 158 lbs
Cooley is 5'10.5" 180 lbs
The poster that suggested it is named Skip Bayless. That is on brand.I hop to the habs board and what do i find?
View attachment 612618
Leave this type of crap thread out of here.