OT: Hurricanes Lounge XLV: Y2K Twenty-Four Years Later

Status
Not open for further replies.

Derailed75

Registered User
Jan 5, 2021
5,468
13,163
Danville
The way they get around that caveat is by the mantra "We tolerate everything but intolerance" which is the result of mining this insipid tautology from leftist philosopher Karl Popper: "

"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. [...] We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.”​



Nevermind, feel like my comment was gonna get me banned
 

WreckingCrew

Registered User
Feb 4, 2015
13,728
41,773
Around HFB? Maybe. But I’d say we got super open-minded mods.

I once got a warning for saying what I got warning for. It was apparently disclosure of personal information.
Same here way back when I first got on here, which I found really because it's like getting a ticket for telling someone you got a speeding ticket. Now we're both going to get a warning for mentioning we got a warning for saying we got a warning
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrazeksVengeance

cptjeff

Reprehensible User
Sep 18, 2008
22,079
40,018
Washington, DC.
Around HFB? Maybe. But I’d say we got super open-minded mods.

I once got a warning for saying what I got warning for. It was apparently disclosure of personal information.

The local constabulary is pretty willing to let things slide as long as things aren't getting heated, but sometimes globals or admins drop in and have different opinions.

And the no discussion of moderation rule is just broadly ridiculous. If anything, discussing moderation lets people better understand where the lines are, which, if you want people to actually behave, is only a positive. But it is a rule, so tut tut, let's drop that line of discussion.
 

WreckingCrew

Registered User
Feb 4, 2015
13,728
41,773
The local constabulary is pretty willing to let things slide as long as things aren't getting heated, but sometimes globals or admins drop in and have different opinions.

And the no discussion of moderation rule is just broadly ridiculous. If anything, discussing moderation lets people better understand where the lines are, which, if you want people to actually behave, is only a positive. But it is a rule, so tut tut, let's drop that line of discussion.
Yea I think HFCanes for the most part is pretty chill. It's over on the HFMain that it's just like NHL officiating, fans of some franchises are allowed to get away with murder while those from "lesser" franchises can't even criticize without it being considered "flaming"
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
41,212
49,208
Yeah the last time, and I think you were included in the ban I didn't think anyone from either side said anything out of line.

The last ban wave, I assume, was due to their “No politics“ rule. Which, to be fair, I can see the reasoning behind. It’s a very violate topic, especially lately, and while I agree that no one said anything out of line, it seems like one of those rules that they have to enforce harshly because if they allow the topic to be discussed, it almost always eventually ends up in a very heated circular discussion.

That being said, as more and more aspects of everyday life apparently become “political issues”, the banning of such discussions would eventually lead to the absence of all off-topic discussion. The Chik-Fil-A post is a prime example of that. When I first posted it, politics was the last thing on my mind. I just thought it was a very weird idea that had almost no chance of success and wanted to see if others had a reasonable explanation. The initial answer was pushing far-right propaganda, which it could very well be, given Chik-Fil-A’s previous history, but Dave also provided the answer of tax manipulation, which also makes sense. And has nothing to do with politics.
 

Finlandia WOAT

No blocks, No slappers
May 23, 2010
24,507
24,950
promote their agenda

the-admiral-agenda-is-dead-v0-vuas4zv7ysoc1.jpeg
 

cptjeff

Reprehensible User
Sep 18, 2008
22,079
40,018
Washington, DC.
The last ban wave, I assume, was due to their “No politics“ rule. Which, to be fair, I can see the reasoning behind. It’s a very violate topic, especially lately, and while I agree that no one said anything out of line, it seems like one of those rules that they have to enforce harshly because if they allow the topic to be discussed, it almost always eventually ends up in a very heated circular discussion.

That being said, as more and more aspects of everyday life apparently become “political issues”, the banning of such discussions would eventually lead to the absence of all off-topic discussion. The Chik-Fil-A post is a prime example of that. When I first posted it, politics was the last thing on my mind. I just thought it was a very weird idea that had almost no chance of success and wanted to see if others had a reasonable explanation. The initial answer was pushing far-right propaganda, which it could very well be, given Chik-Fil-A’s previous history, but Dave also provided the answer of tax manipulation, which also makes sense. And has nothing to do with politics.

Ultimately, politics is how we collectively choose to organize society, and thus any discussion of any way society should change or stay the same when it's changing is politics. Obviously that's way too broad to be useful for a discussion forum.

Of course, when most people think of the term "politics", they're thinking mostly of electoral politics, parties and elections. That's pretty clearly out of bounds here, and I'm fine with that, and I think everyone gets that. But when you're discussing social issues without regard to the electoral and partisan battles of it, I tend to think that's appropriate for an off topic thread as long as things aren't getting too heated. At that point it becomes more about the flaming and trolling side than the fact that it's political per se, though there are some topics (abortion, Israel-Palestine) where I've generally just nuked posts as soon as I see them. Ultimately, all of this is a judgement call.
 

hblueridgegal

hygge time
Sep 13, 2019
8,569
30,146
Old North State
The Concert for Carolina had an attendance of 82,193. A 6 hour event that raised: $24,513,185.00 Everything sold goes to relief efforts - tickets, merch, food, booze and tips.

Luke Combs and Eric Church put on a wonderful event with an array of performers. A fun yet touching occasion and people were genuinely so nice. Hadn't been to a show that ended at 1:00 am in quite some time. Hope it helps to ease the pain a little for some.
 

Surrounded By Ahos

Las Vegas Desert Ducks Official Team Poster
May 24, 2008
27,320
85,269
Koko Miami
I visited Antietam National Battlefield for the first time this weekend. I’ve been meaning to do it for years and finally made the time. It was a really incredible experience. The battlefield is extremely well preserved. All of the monuments and trails are well marked and maintained. I got a bit choked up walking through the west woods trail. For me it was an easy hike on a beautiful autumn day. For several thousand boys and men it became hell on earth. I spoke to a woman at the bloody lane whose ancestor was a union soldier who attacked that position.

He was 15. f***ing 15. It’s unimaginable.


I can’t recommend it highly enough; for anybody. Even if you don’t have any interest in American history. It’s an extremely sobering place.
 

MrazeksVengeance

VENGEANCE
Feb 27, 2018
7,627
28,652
Ultimately, politics is how we collectively choose to organize society, and thus any discussion of any way society should change or stay the same when it's changing is politics. Obviously that's way too broad to be useful for a discussion forum.

Of course, when most people think of the term "politics", they're thinking mostly of electoral politics, parties and elections. That's pretty clearly out of bounds here, and I'm fine with that, and I think everyone gets that. But when you're discussing social issues without regard to the electoral and partisan battles of it, I tend to think that's appropriate for an off topic thread as long as things aren't getting too heated. At that point it becomes more about the flaming and trolling side than the fact that it's political per se, though there are some topics (abortion, Israel-Palestine) where I've generally just nuked posts as soon as I see them. Ultimately, all of this is a judgement call.
Fun story, I actually teach some 3rd year med students in English program. 2 girls from Iran, 3 girls and 1 guy from Israel.

No explosive relations thus far.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad