Worse than an expansion team lol...only if you go by the template of Vegas as an 'expansion team' and not what an expansion team actually was for a hundred years before that.
This. At this point whatever we get as long as it turns into a NHL regular is basically equal to Larsson anywayShero doesn't really need to "redeem" himself when it comes to Hall given what he gave up to get him.
I'm thinking the opposite.
I think judging by people's posts, most here will be shocked by how much Taylor Hall fetches, and those people will think Shero TOTALLY REDEEMED HIMSELF!!!!!!!!!!
Worse than an expansion team lol...only if you go by the template of Vegas as an 'expansion team' and not what an expansion team actually was for a hundred years before that.
I doubt it. When he was going into his prime and had 4 years at $6 million per on his contract he was traded for Lars. According to reports Buffalo and NYI rejected deals for him. Now he has less than a season left on that contract, is coming off an injury that cost him two thirds of the previous year, and is producing like he did in his last 2 seasons in Edmonton and his first year here. Only unrealistic posters could think Hall has high value at this point.I'm waiting for the eventual "That's all we got for Hall?!" reaction from the people that are slagging him on the way out.
This works both ways. You can't on the one hand say Shero has accomplished something with the drafting and then on the other hand say it's too early to judge. What you're pointing out is that he's drafted some players that appear to have potential. Which I have acknowledged is an improvement from five years ago. But it's not the gigantic accomplishment that you and many others her tout it to be...for the reason I just stated. We won't know for sure that these drafts were a success for some time. As for the two "blue chip" prospects...like you said, any of the players chosen at the top of that class would have been blue chippers...we tanked our way to that spot, and then got lucky with the lottery ball to boot. The only "skill" you need to draft a good player in that spot is to lose a lot of games. I'll concede the Devils have been very good in that department for Ray's entire tenure so far!
Again, how can this be touted as some great accomplishment when the acquisition of these players has not resulted in a better product on the ice? You have to look big picture, not at individual trades. These are meaningless if the construction of the team makes no sense and/or the GM fails to address specific roster needs and as a result the team continues to lose. Which is basically exactly what has happened. I don't care that he "stole" Palmieri...that steal hasn't resulted in more wins so why exactly does Shero get a pat on the back? This way of looking at things is legitimately perplexing to me.
I literally said in my post that this is not about comparing, it's about judging Shero on his own merit. But you do what you gotta do to drive the narrative.
This is what this thread is really about, our roster isn't a contender obviously, but we're better than a last place team. It's the losing culture thats the norm nowadays, from the players to the fans.It’s just surprising he didn’t learn from the whole Bylsma thing which ultimately cost him his job.
The Devils were not worse than an expansion team, but it just isn't that far away, given what the team was worth in total assets when Shero took over. Larsson, Severson, Henrique, Schneider - these were the only 4 players on the team really worth anything at the time. Everybody else was probably worth a 2nd round pick or less, and the Devils had picked 29th, not at all, 30th in the most recent 1st rounds when Shero took over.
Where do you get these nonsensical analogies? We are talking about the GM’s performance not the players. Do you think that GM who drafted them was doing a good job? Hint: he was fired.soooo its your opinion that unless a team wins consistently, there can't be good moves made or good players?
I guess guys like McDavid and Draisaitl suck in your world then?
weird take.
Where do you get these nonsensical analogies? We are talking about the GM’s performance not the players. Do you think that GM who drafted them was doing a good job? Hint: he was fired.
Thank you for proving my point.
I need to hear what should have been done to "address" the goalie situation this summer. Should he have acquired a guy like Domingue in July? OK, maybe. But what difference would that have made?
Schneider's contract is immovable. Plus he showed promise late last year.
It’s not confusing. The team still sucks. Just because Ray managed to lose his way into a couple of top draft picks and fleece a few teams in trades does not automatically mean he’s done a good job. Just like Chiarelli didn’t do a good job in Edmonton just because he landed Draisaitl and McDavid.so its your opinion that Palmieri, Hall, Vatanen, etc. have not been good in NJ? I am so confused. You are all over the place. He acquired those players and those players have played well to very well as Devils.
so its your opinion that Palmieri, Hall, Vatanen, etc. have not been good in NJ? I am so confused. You are all over the place. He acquired those players and those players have played well to very well as Devils.
yeah, youre very off base with this that I don't even know what to say.
Take the 2015 draft out of it. Lou and Conte ran that draft....Shero (and Castron) did not. So you should start your draft comparisons from 2016 onward. As someone else mentioned, we don't really have many players (if any) that are in their actual prime. Most are either leaving it/past it or just entering it.
Hughes and Hischier are blue-chip players. Ty Smith is a very good prospect. Jesper Boqvist is a very good prospect. Reilly Walsh is a very good prospect. Thats just from 4 drafts. I'm not sure how many "blue-chip" prospects you think some of these other teams have, exactly....? Yes, you can say that we "lucked" into the draft lottery wins, but if we had picked 3rd or 4th in 2017 maybe we would have taken Pettersson (also a blue-chip players), so I don't really buy that argument.
Shero stole Palmieri. He stole Hall. He stole Johansson (who didn't work out as we hoped, but still). He made a nice trade for Vatanen. He signed Butcher. He made a nice trade for Subban. He made a nice trade for Gusev.
I totally agree that if he continues to keep Hynes around for this year (and beyond), thats on him. But lets not act like the organization player-wise and prospect-wise is comparable to 2015 because thats an insane statement.
So we have better players now but the results are as bad or worse than when the rebuild started. I guess that's progress.