Yeah no hes not close
Ok #4 right now. #2 upside
Numbers arent much better for his "break out" year of 2015-16. Of his top linemates. 8/10 top linemates do better without him than with him. Below is his raw #s. The more positive numbers and the higher they are, the worse. These represent teammates improvement in possession #s without him. Some shockingly bad numbers.
3.4
6.1
3.8
5.8
2
4.8
2.6
4.2
-0.2
-2.7
1.6
8.1
3.6
5.4
5.7
-9.3
2.3
5.2
27.1
14.4
7.8
16.5
15.6
-0.9
24.7
25.6
5.5
Ekblad plays on a good team. That affects.
I don't know were you are getting at? Ristolainen is not better than Ekblad now nor is he a better 'prospect'.
Neither are prospects at this point. All he's saying is that you can't ignore how a player is effected by who he's playing with. At this point Ekblad is getting much more support than Risto is. Though I would still argue Ekblad has the slight edge over Risto.
I don't know were you are getting at? Ristolainen is not better than Ekblad now nor is he a better 'prospect'.
It was the moment RR scored his 40th point this season when it struck me, we might have a new poor man's Aki Berg in our hands.The next Aki Berg.
If anyone wants to continue to post those god awful hero charts to prove they know nothing about hockey go right ahead. Hero charts are ****ing G A R B A G E.
Yeah no hes not close
Ok #4 right now. #2 upside
Numbers arent much better for his "break out" year of 2015-16. Of his top linemates. 8/10 top linemates do better without him than with him. Below is his raw #s. The more positive numbers and the higher they are, the worse. These represent teammates improvement in possession #s without him. Some shockingly bad numbers.
3.4
6.1
3.8
5.8
2
4.8
2.6
4.2
-0.2
-2.7
1.6
8.1
3.6
5.4
5.7
-9.3
2.3
5.2
27.1
14.4
7.8
16.5
15.6
-0.9
24.7
25.6
5.5
The chart you've posted has Zadorov as his second most common partner. How are past years relevant when considering how he's developed?
These "warrior" or "hero" columns are extremely useful for discussion board purposes.
I mean, every time someone throws one of those without even indicating that the lack of context (team/partner/role/usage) might be a problem, you know that there is something very wrong in the posts offered.
ROR and Gorges have easier zone and competition usage away from Risto which make the numbers away from Ristolainen look nicer. That's where you find the discrepancy.
I haven't seen many better/more promising d-men in the league at the age of 20 than Ristolainen.
People incorrectly use analytics and advanced stats on a daily basis here on hf. One glaring example is how people ignore the time frame on warrior stats used in this very thread.
I get why people think that. They look bad. I don't think people realize how much of a negative Josh Gorges (especially on a top pairing) is in terms of possession stats though. He's a really, really big negative.