Enniskillen
Registered User
- Jan 16, 2021
- 1,080
- 1,671
It’s holl over again, boys. I guess we can skip game in Tampa and prepare for Monday nightmare.
It's a symptom of the play style. The Leafs are a possession team, the D are expected to make a tape to tape pass not just dump it out. When the opposition takes away the passing options they need to either delay, make a difficult pass or beat the forchecker. With Sandin gone and Lilly in the press box Rielly is really the only D capable of doing those things with regularity.The thing that really struck me last night is how poorly they exit the D zone. I'm not sure of the right words to describe it other than to say there is a "deliberateness" that is lacking. And this is when they do have a moment to make a decision.
The clearing attempts are too often weak and rushed instead of simple and confident.
See any similarities to last night's game ??The 2019 game 6 was a Nationally televised Sunday afternoon game and they were a complete no show.
From that game until now the “Core Fore” have never given anyone a reason to believe they are anything other than what they were on that day.
There you go things are changing clearly .. I don't watch hardly any TV as i invest my time in going to things live .. my 3 kids all watch on their computers with different online services .. not sure how numbers get calculated but how do these kids factor in if they watch online? and does Rogers control da online services too?I was looking at the TV ratings thread @ the business forum. The Jets series avg. 500k viewers and the Leafs series hasn't broke the 3 mil mark.
I know a lot of younger demographics are cord cutters so they don't count, but the numbers are depressingly low.
I've often wondered that and wished to f*** I did it.OTHO, if you bet against the Leafs; I mean, in some ways, Leafs must win enough games to adv.
![]()
It counts if the viewer uses their official streaming services such as SN Now or CBC app.There you go things are changing clearly .. I don't watch hardly any TV as i invest my time in going to things live .. my 3 kids all watch on their computers with different online services .. not sure how numbers get calculated but how do these kids factor in if they watch online? and does Rogers control da online services too?
What did the reporter say?after getting embarrassed by that reporter in the post game there's no way Keefe can take Holl out now.
I really thought they were going to win this series in 6 , but they’ve been worse than last three of the Montreal series.That was my feeling too, but I got stupid and thought this year was different. To be honest, even if they pull this series off, I still think this core needs to be exploded.
You’re wrong, it’s the officiatingThe leafs are 0-10 on elimination games. Let's say every elimination game was a 50/50 chance to win. What do you think the percent chance to lose all 10 games are? Maybe 20%? 5%?
Nope.
It's (get ready).... 0.098%.
Read that number again.
0.098%
So clearly this is more than luck. MUCH more than luck.
And there's only been ONE constant thing during that 0.098% chance to happen.
The core. That's IT.
Matthews, Reilly, Marner, Nylander. Those are the only 4 players that have played all 10 of those elimination games.
3 different goalies, 2 different coaches, 2 different gm's.
How many D have we tried working around them? 16. SIXTEEN!!!! Giardano, Holl, Brodie, McCabe, Schenn, Sandin, Lyubushkin, Muzzin, Dermott, Barrie, Ceci, Marincin, Gardiner, Polak, Hainsey, Zaitsev,
How many forwards we tried working around them? 31. THIRTY ONE!!!! Auston-Reese, Kerfoot, Jarnkrok, Knies, Lafferty, Acciari, Kampf, O'Reilly, Tavares, Blackwell, Bunting, Engvall, Kase, Mikheyev, Spezza, Foligno, Galchenyuk, Hyman, Simmonds, Cliffard, Johnsson, Kapanen, Ennis, Brown, Gauthier, Marleau, Moore, Bozak, Kadri, Plecanek, JVR.
Including all skaters, that's FIFTY different players we've tried building around those 4 players. Remember, the odds of losing those 10 games in a row is 0.098%. And there's only FOUR things in common for all 10 games.
If they pull this off and lose in round two then there are some difficult decisions that need to be made. But if they lose this again in typical leafy fashion, then it's time to tear the whole f***ing thing down.
Yep, but Tampa‘s stars didn’t score
Preach. Get another top pairing dman and a goaltender out of it too would be nice.I know that sounds dramatic but you're right, it's been almost 10 years since the rebuild really started and we drafted Nylander and it's been complete failure.
Yea, but it's just not the D......it happens to the forwards as well.It's a symptom of the play style. The Leafs are a possession team, the D are expected to make a tape to tape pass not just dump it out. When the opposition takes away the passing options they need to either delay, make a difficult pass or beat the forchecker. With Sandin gone and Lilly in the press box Rielly is really the only D capable of doing those things with regularity.
And that's why for guys with limited skill (Holl and Schenn in particular) you see them go from having time and space to them holding onto the puck until either losing it or being forced to reverse the puck along the boards.
It’s actually quite simple. The Leafs often rely on the opposition to beat themselves, more so than taking control.The leafs are 0-10 on elimination games. Let's say every elimination game was a 50/50 chance to win. What do you think the percent chance to lose all 10 games are? Maybe 20%? 5%?
Nope.
It's (get ready).... 0.098%.
Read that number again.
0.098%
So clearly this is more than luck. MUCH more than luck.
And there's only been ONE constant thing during that 0.098% chance to happen.
The core. That's IT.
Matthews, Reilly, Marner, Nylander. Those are the only 4 players that have played all 10 of those elimination games.
3 different goalies, 2 different coaches, 2 different gm's.
How many D have we tried working around them? 16. SIXTEEN!!!! Giardano, Holl, Brodie, McCabe, Schenn, Sandin, Lyubushkin, Muzzin, Dermott, Barrie, Ceci, Marincin, Gardiner, Polak, Hainsey, Zaitsev,
How many forwards we tried working around them? 31. THIRTY ONE!!!! Auston-Reese, Kerfoot, Jarnkrok, Knies, Lafferty, Acciari, Kampf, O'Reilly, Tavares, Blackwell, Bunting, Engvall, Kase, Mikheyev, Spezza, Foligno, Galchenyuk, Hyman, Simmonds, Cliffard, Johnsson, Kapanen, Ennis, Brown, Gauthier, Marleau, Moore, Bozak, Kadri, Plecanek, JVR.
Including all skaters, that's FIFTY different players we've tried building around those 4 players. Remember, the odds of losing those 10 games in a row is 0.098%. And there's only FOUR things in common for all 10 games.
If they pull this off and lose in round two then there are some difficult decisions that need to be made. But if they lose this again in typical leafy fashion, then it's time to tear the whole f***ing thing down.
I agree with the take on replacing the front office but you can't apply a 50/50 chance of winning to sporting eventsThe leafs are 0-10 on elimination games. Let's say every elimination game was a 50/50 chance to win. What do you think the percent chance to lose all 10 games are? Maybe 20%? 5%?
Nope.
It's (get ready).... 0.098%.
Read that number again.
0.098%
Was there a single poster on here that didn't know playing Holl was most likely a bad decision?
Can they be worse?
Holy shit! I need Marty McFly's DeLorean....OTHO, if you bet against the Leafs; I mean, in some ways, Leafs must win enough games to adv.
![]()
Wow. This is eye opening.The leafs are 0-10 on elimination games. Let's say every elimination game was a 50/50 chance to win. What do you think the percent chance to lose all 10 games are? Maybe 20%? 5%?
Nope.
It's (get ready).... 0.098%.
Read that number again.
0.098%
So clearly this is more than luck. MUCH more than luck.
And there's only been ONE constant thing during that 0.098% chance to happen.
The core. That's IT.
Matthews, Reilly, Marner, Nylander. Those are the only 4 players that have played all 10 of those elimination games.
3 different goalies, 2 different coaches, 2 different gm's.
How many D have we tried working around them? 16. SIXTEEN!!!! Giardano, Holl, Brodie, McCabe, Schenn, Sandin, Lyubushkin, Muzzin, Dermott, Barrie, Ceci, Marincin, Gardiner, Polak, Hainsey, Zaitsev,
How many forwards we tried working around them? 31. THIRTY ONE!!!! Auston-Reese, Kerfoot, Jarnkrok, Knies, Lafferty, Acciari, Kampf, O'Reilly, Tavares, Blackwell, Bunting, Engvall, Kase, Mikheyev, Spezza, Foligno, Galchenyuk, Hyman, Simmonds, Cliffard, Johnsson, Kapanen, Ennis, Brown, Gauthier, Marleau, Moore, Bozak, Kadri, Plecanek, JVR.
Including all skaters, that's FIFTY different players we've tried building around those 4 players. Remember, the odds of losing those 10 games in a row is 0.098%. And there's only FOUR things in common for all 10 games.
If they pull this off and lose in round two then there are some difficult decisions that need to be made. But if they lose this again in typical leafy fashion, then it's time to tear the whole f***ing thing down.
Holl is our cryptonite.I swear if Holl is in next game ...![]()